Can we still save women from themselves or are they a lost cause?Men gave them rights and they became more miserable, neurotic, depressed, and dysfunctional than at any other point in history.
>>85280783Always. When i met my wife she wasn't in a great place, but we managed to cobble together some savings. Women are people too. You just have to convince them. Now if only I could get bac k to the google hey google
They arentBefore they just couldn't express it because they were literal slaves and slaves get murdered for expressing their emotions. Women are neurotic due to their biology. They are constantly flushed with sharp emotional waves that are not connected to anything happening irl, but are just their natural cycles
>>85280808>Women are neurotic due to their biology. They are constantly flushed with sharp emotional waves that are not connected to anything happening irlThis is a solid argument for taking away their rights.
>>85280783>they became more miserable, neurotic, depressed, and dysfunctional than at any other point in history.Oh yes, I'm sure the women drinking laudanum straight from the bottle during the 20th century were so much happier under male oppression than they are now.
>>85280850It is notRights exist for compassion purposes. Those who are at a disadvantage naturally need them more. Without the base of compassion we may as well turn 70% of both genders into slaves, that would benefit "society"(which refers to elites) more. As a rich person I would pretty much enjoy poorfags not having rights, because their stupidity really shines and by their lifestyles they dont truly register as humans to me. Still, they are indeed humans and should have options for ascending above their condition
