legitimately don't know where else to ask about this so: apparently in 2025 i received a 3 year ban from leftypol for being a "datacenter node." im pretty sure i've never posted there or if i did it was only like 1 or two replies. i don't know what a datacenter node ban means. i tried appealing and just typed "i have no idea what this ban is for and i've never posted here" and the mods denied it. i don't really care about being able to post there i just want an explanation on what the ban was for. like what does that even mean? i can't ask on the meta board because i've been banned from all of them. has anyone here encountered this message before
>LeftypolThou hast to go back.
>>85416926Mods didn't like you and had no real reason to ban kek
>>85416926Woah woah woah I'm not on that board or whatever dude wrong place to ask metas.I'm not about to care about this shit. I'm here for shitposts.
The gist of it is that their ban system thinks your IP's origin is from a datacenter or server. A bot.
>>85416926are you on mobile data or something? perhaps some unusual activity was associated with your IP because of that
>>85416968>>85416984yeah i was on mobile data when i saw the ban, what's confusing is it says i was banned in 2025 and i definitely haven't been on there with mobile before as far as i can remember. the last time i browsed there i was on my laptop. maybe it's just every mobile ip from my carrier idk>>85416945i have a fetish for autistic political extremist fakecels because i want to fix them and the left leaning ones are usually marginally less misanthropic. i was basically just looking for balkan bpd e-boyfriend. not sure if that makes me any less retarded than the average leftypol poster tho
>>85416926You have to go into their Matrix chat to appeal the ban and they might be able to find a solution for you. They're (usually) more helpful in Matrix. The reason they ban a lot of IP ranges is because sharteens like to spam cp.That said I get banned from Leftypol on a weekly basis the mods are kind of retarded.
>>85417097>i have a fetish for autistic political extremist fakecels because i want to fix them and the left leaning ones are usually marginally less misanthropic. i was basically just looking for balkan bpd e-boyfriend. not sure if that makes me any less retarded than the average leftypol poster thounfortunate you live in the balkans because I'm pretty much exactly this and half my leftypol bans are from complaining about "incel shit" in /siberia/. europe in general has way less incels i think so goodluck lol.
>>85417156i dont live in the balkans, it's just that my ideal boyfriend is an esl slav. their accents are super cute>>85417146i didn't want to have to join matrix because i feel like encrypted messaging apps are for pedophiles. i suppose i have no other option though
>>85417156also im surprised they even ban for incel content because from my brief time reading through their boards most of the guys there seem to be just as retarded about women as the people here
>>85417368leftypol is like 90% incels but the mod staff are mostly trannies so they take incel posting REALLY personally. you can have totally normal discussions about marxist inceldom for hundreds of posts and then some tranny janny walks into the thread and just bans 50 ip's for "incel shit" and you go into the matrix chat and have to argue with the tranny jannies for an hour just to get unbanned when the one non-tranny janny shows up and realizes they're all having a tranny moment.you can go to /siberia/ and see half the threads are about incel stuff lol. the shit they choose to ban for is completely arbitrary. there's one guy that just goes around posting about genociding men and promoting male circumcision as revenge on the male gender and the mods just let them go free. it's crazy lol.and yes for the record I am extremely left-wing. it's just leftypol has a way of making you hate your fellow leftists.
>>85417382awwwww hahaha the phrase marxist inceldom is so cute ......... my heart is filled with joy knowing there are so many leftcels out there i want to kiss all of their greasy foreheads
>>85417396just be aware most leftcels are not some skinny eastern european but instead a skinny latin american or arab or some mystery meat american.or in my case a fat arab.most marxist incel discourse brings attention to things like the way dating culture is heavily weighted towards women fetishizing bourgeois traits(height, light skin, wealth, etc) and demonizing prole traits. for some reason leftist foids can't handle this truthnuke and will make endless excuses for their worship of the bourgeois 6'4 chad who consumes 5,000 calories a day as a "non-political" preference and then call you a misogynist incel for suggesting they try dating someone who works a normal job for a living.
>>85417460i don't think this kind of argument holds any more value than when fat people accuse men of pedophilia for being attracted to thin women. the truth is that it sucks to be unwanted and it's tempting to try to find some moral justification for why others should change their standards to include you. i agree that social norms and politics and so on influence beauty standards, but self-reflection and deprogramming can only take you so far. nobody, man or woman, needs to 'excuse' their preferences to anyone, as long as you're not a paraphile. you like who you like.
>>85416926I didn't know leftypol was a real thing. I thought it was some shit schizo pol fags threw around with their other delusions.
>>85417637It practically is in their conception of it but yeah there's a website. That's where the chud face meme came from, to make fun of /pol/, and they've basically been seething about it ever since.
>>85417595Marxism isn't really concerned with shaming people for their individual choices because everything is about systems, propaganda, culture, etc.The argument would basically boil down to>"the white zionist bourgeois billionaire media promotes fetishization of their own people because they are the ruling class and they want to have a monopoly on women. by rebelling against this system and dating incels who don't fit conventional attractiveness you are fighting against capital's propaganda machine. by participating in the system you are simply behaving as planned, nothing more, nothing less, akin to eating mcdonalds or shopping at walmart, it isn't a sin it's just kinda NPC behavior."what foids can't handle about this is they're like, instinctively convinced that their choice of fetishizing the 5% of men who are over 6'0 is some personal decision and not just a consequence of decades of media propaganda like hollywood only casting tall men as lead actors and using camera tricks to make them look even taller. women, even on the left, seem totally unable to separate themselves from the propaganda they fall victim to and accept "yeah maybe I am a bit of an NPC lol", so they just call you a incel chud and try to shame you for bringing it up. I think the left will never succeed in the west until they are willing to acknowledge the incel chud epidemic and take steps to give young men sex. because at the end of the day politics is entirely about the material conditions of the polity, "ideology" and "morality" are just spooks for materialist(class) conflict. if the far-right are the ones offering young men to let them rape and pillage the global south while the left just crosses their arms and calls it "cringe" while not offering any alternative then the right will just have uncontested advertising to these people.
>>85417738by this logic, the vast majority of people are resisting against capitalist machine. like you said, less than 5% of men are above 6', let alone over 6', conventionally attractive, and financially stable. 80% of america is overweight, and half of those people are obese. the median hosehold income is close to the poverty line in many states. the average person is fairly unattractive.yet way, way more than 5% of adults are having sex, dating, and getting married. by their early 20s, 90% of men have lost their virginity. by their mid-20s, 40% of men are dating, and half of those men are cohabitating with a partner. by the age of thirty, nearly 50% of men are married.yes, beauty standards are heavily psyopped. but the reality is that men (and women) who don't reach those standards of beauty, wealth, status, or behavior are still having sex all the time. the truth is that there's no major political movement to "give young men sex" because the majority of young men are having sex. people who reach adulthood and are genuinely too hideous, too poor, too low-status, or too abrasive to fuck even once by the time they're 30 are a small minority. and, really, what does it mean to "give young men sex?" let's say there's a political upheaval, a shift in beauty and relationship standards, and the rate of adult male virginity shrinks back down to ~5%. what is to be done for the remaining 5% of men? what is the full solution for incelhood, that doesn't threaten women and girls with rape?
>>85418043>by this logic, the vast majority of people are resisting against capitalist machine. like you said, less than 5% of men are above 6', let alone over 6', conventionally attractive, and financially stable. 80% of america is overweight, and half of those people are obese. the median hosehold income is close to the poverty line in many states. the average person is fairly unattractive.>yet way, way more than 5% of adults are having sex, dating, and getting married. by their early 20s, 90% of men have lost their virginity. by their mid-20s, 40% of men are dating, and half of those men are cohabitating with a partner. by the age of thirty, nearly 50% of men are married.People aren't resisting capitalism by engaging in hypergamy tho. The thing is, the bourgeois by definition require the proles to reproduce to maintain the slave class. In the American slavery days they'd engage in a system of eugenics where strong tall negro men were forcefully bred with tall strong negro women to create superniggas that could work the fields more efficiently. But if the master of the house wanted a negro woman, he would take her for himself. He always had priority. And she would always seek to fuck her master just as a way to raise her own position in the class hierarchy and potentially the class position of her children. This system has remained alive in the modern day, with the bourgeois encouraging women to reproduce with as many men as possible to keep the slave caste populated while also encouraging them to demonize men who aren't "ideal slaves"(unemployed, autistic, low physical strength, no respect for hierarchy, low net worth, etc) while fetishizing men who embody "capitalist" qualities. and women just kind of embrace this because it's in their own class interest to "date upwards" so to speak and seek wealthy/high status men for their own personal gain.
>>85418076i'm not sure what you think my argument is here but this doesn't really make sense as a response to anything i said. it feels like you're arguing based on what you think makes sense, but an argument feeling like it has explanatory power doesn't mean it's actually true.
>>85418043>and, really, what does it mean to "give young men sex?" let's say there's a political upheaval, a shift in beauty and relationship standards, and the rate of adult male virginity shrinks back down to ~5%. what is to be done for the remaining 5% of men? what is the full solution for incelhood, that doesn't threaten women and girls with rape?this is a very nuanced topic but at the very least we should be able to explore things like government brothels, more "humanist" matchmaking systems/programs, reducing the influence of economics in dating by eliminating for-profit dating apps, etc. I would like to explore this topic more but without the resources to fund proof of concept studies it's kind of hard to decide what a "best" solution would be under a marxist framework. At the very least, the Chinese are working very hard to solve this issue, as many local Communist parties in China are taking a hands on approach with Communist aunties trying to pair up younger party members in their towns to maintain the population.I don't think it's an issue where you can just have some strawman reaction demonizing incels or accepting that it's "inevitable" that they'll die alone when male loneliness has been skyrocketing as a direct consequence of the society we live in. If Capitalism is causing any form of inequality to become worse then it isn't a "natural" behavior to accept, it's something we should be addressing and combating if we are to call ourselves Marxists. Simply choosing to live in a broken system because it's convenient for you in particular, makes you no better than the bourgeois who perpetuate slavery for their own benefit.
>>85418097admittedly I kind of posted a rant without being conscious of the character limit and by the time I hit 1950 characters I had no time left to post my own position.my own position on the topic of the contradiction between dating standards and actual dating as it exists irl is that women as a whole are socialized to date the best men within their given environment, and if no "chads" are available they will settle for less, and many people are emotionally broken and overly codependent so will cling to someone they aren't attracted to just to avoid being alone. that is to say, the path to finding a gf as an ugly manlet is just to "get lucky" that you come across a desperate foid who is too mentally damaged and clings to you immediately. but this is not a reliable way to pair bond. I hear this all the time from ugly manlet friends: they basically just had a girl fall into their lap, they didn't "do" anything to get a gf and if they were forced to do it again they'd just kill themselves. I think this system is, on its face, completely illogical and we need to completely revamp how we teach women to date. not just for mens' sake but because women are actively hurting themselves by dating abusive men just so they don't have to be alone or just because they are high status. we need to teach women that romance is supposed to feel good and you don't need to be monkeybranching all the time to be human. it's kinda funny, my "femcel" friends i talk to just cannot stay single for more than a week because they just go fucking insane if they don't have a boyfriend, yet this inability to function as an individual results in their relationships always imploding and making them more jaded towards men. I wish I had that kind of privilege man. I was forced to internalize eternal solitude at a very young age because women actively rejected me, not just from dating but social life as a whole. maybe women just aren't lonely enough.
>>85418098>government brothelsextremely dubious morality of the sex industry aside, prostitution already exists everywhere, legal or not, and is an option for incels right now. not a super active browser of incel forums, but from what i've seen many men buy sex and continue to identify as incels, because what they're actually seeking is mutual connection with a woman who is actually attracted to them, which is something that can't really be bought or enforced.>when male loneliness has been skyrocketing as a direct consequence of the society we live inloneliness is on the rise in both genders, especially in NDs. young adult male virginity rates have risen from 5% to 10% and young adult female virginity rates from 4% to 7%. while women are (and always have been) generally slightly less likely to be alone than men, there has been a rise in single and unmarried women as well. neurodivergent women are actually more likely to be virgins, with ~47% of autistic adult males having never had sex and 50% in women. generally, i'm confused by the hyperfocusing on *male* experiences of loneliness. yes, women are less likely to be lonely, but usually the difference is marginal. why is it that you've posited all these solutions for ugly and socially unappealing men, yet ugly and socially unappealing women are not to be given any of the same pity or accomodations?>>85418121oops! character limit, response incoming at some point
>>85418180>extremely dubious morality of the sex industry aside, prostitution already exists everywhere, legal or not, and is an option for incels right now. not a super active browser of incel forums, but from what i've seen many men buy sex and continue to identify as incels, because what they're actually seeking is mutual connection with a woman who is actually attracted to them, which is something that can't really be bought or enforced.the purpose of that kind of service would be less for "sex" and more as a kind of sex ed class for people who need it. it would be framed as "sexual therapy" basically. you'd receive affection and skin to skin contact from a licensed sex therapist and be able to work through your issues with loneliness. i imagine it would be way more successful than the overly sterilized system of therapy we practice under capital.>generally, i'm confused by the hyperfocusing on *male* experiences of loneliness. yes, women are less likely to be lonely, but usually the difference is marginal. why is it that you've posited all these solutions for ugly and socially unappealing men, yet ugly and socially unappealing women are not to be given any of the same pity or accomodations?my response to this is twofold. for one, I don't think femcels are really much of a thing even in self-reported studies. women don't cite "inability to find someone willing to be their partner" for their lack of sex. usually it's because they don't want sex/romance, or they feel they aren't capable of it. so I don't think it's as serious of an issue when you take out the "involuntary" part of "involuntary celibacy". of course, for women who do desperately want a partner, I believe we should do everything we can as a society to help them find one, just as we should for incels. my other reason is, as a male I just simply don't think I'm qualified to talk on the subject of female loneliness or femceldom or provide solutions. that's for the girlies to figure out.
>>85418121>I was forced to internalize eternal solitude at a very young age because women actively rejected me, not just from dating but social life as a whole.my experience growing up as an ND and ugly girl was extremely similar. i think that men don't interact with women very often, so they'll interpret even platonic interactions as an expression of interest, and if you're ugly enough they have to respond with disgust to signal to others they would never sink that low. so interacting even with ugly and autistic boys, they would ignore or insult me directly to my face. i remember in middle school a boy i had a crush on but had never spoken to approached me to tell me, unprompted, that i was 'the ugliest bitch he'd ever seen.' these experiences, as far as i can tell, are pretty universal among ugly and autistic girls. the truth is that people just resent ugliness, low status, and ND behavior. even other ugly, low status, ND people. it doesn't matter what your gender is.>>85418195yes, ugly and lonely women can have sex with men they're not attracted to. oftentimes, desperate, unattractive, and sexually violent men. why don't you do the same? after all, i'm sure some man out there would be desperate enough to have sex with you. you wouldn't be attracted to him? what does that matter? lonely women can technically have sex with ugly, unkind, desperate old men, therefore they are volcels. but you can do that too! you don't, because you don't want to have sex that disgusts you, that makes you uncomfortable, that causes you pain or makes you feel unattractive.
>>85418225>yes, ugly and lonely women can have sex with men they're not attracted to. oftentimes, desperate, unattractive, and sexually violent men. why don't you do the same?it simply isn't an option for me. I don't understand why this is so hard for ND women to understand. even if I were to scrape the bottom of the barrel going after bpd hamplanets like sems or cassie that i personally find cute, they would still not want to date me because I am low status.>after all, i'm sure some man out there would be desperate enough to have sex with youyeah, whenever femcels talk about this they always shift the conversation over to gay sex. like incels should just "choose" to be gay to get emotional connection, as if it's just taken for granted that they don't deserve a woman and must settle for gay sex. this is really gross but I understand this is like, the only way femcels have to make it seem like they're "part of the same struggle" while not acknowledging their own unwillingness to date an incel. they just offload the burden to gay men. it's fucking weird lol.>i think that men don't interact with women very often, so they'll interpret even platonic interactions as an expression of interest, and if you're ugly enough they have to respond with disgust to signal to others they would never sink that lowinteresting observation, but this mostly applies to people who are conventionally attractive. I mean, I can tell just from this post that your crush was probably a bit of a dick in general and not just to you. people don't exist in a vacuum, he felt comfortable being cruel to you because socially he is rewarded for it by girls falling for him lol.>the truth is that people just resent ugliness, low status, and ND behavior. even other ugly, low status, ND people. it doesn't matter what your gender is.mhm
>>85418121i think, realistically, this kind of behavior is near equal in men and women. for one, 20% of men report cheating on their partners, while 13% of women do.i feel like the core of your issue is that you're experiencing loneliness due to a variety of factors. maybe you're ugly, maybe you're poor, maybe you're ND and socially isolated. and you've assigned this loneliness to the trait of being male. so we keep shifting the goalposts to explain why, despite men statistically having very similar rates of loneliness to women, true lineliness is 1. a purely male experience and 2. a direct result of psyops on women and their resulting choices. any contrasicting information, anecdotal or empirical, will be flatly ignored and denied.>>85418260>rewarded by girls falling for himthis guy had no girls falling for him. he was ND, shorter than me, nerdy, ugly, unwashed, had acne, bad teeth, unflattering glasses, cheap clothes, and no friends. very, very, stereotypical nerd. you're defaulting to your default perception of reality ("me want chad") because you can't cope with the fact that men also hate ugly NDs, even when they too are ugly and ND. literally every crush i have ever had has been on a similarly conventionally unappealing man. i have only begun to receive male attention and stop being treated with contempt because i became conventionally attractive as an adult. but i'm sure there's some other explanation you'll be able to come up with.
>>85418260>like incels should just "choose" to be gay to get emotional connection, as if it's just taken for granted that they don't deserve a woman and must settle for gay sexso you don't like being told you should settle for unfulfilling relationships with people who are unattractive to you? crazy. what's funny is, i actually attempted dating women despite being straight and none of them wanted me either. i spent my entire childhood and teenage years approaching conventionally unattractive and/or autistic men i had crushes on, and most of them were repulsed. the one guy who attempted using me for sex as a rebound from his girlfriend flirted with me for 2 days and then couldn't actually stomach following through. acknowledging your experiences are not exclusive to men won't kill you
>>85418289>i think, realistically, this kind of behavior is near equal in men and women. for one, 20% of men report cheating on their partners, while 13% of women do.if this is true why did you default to suggesting I should have gay sex with men instead of dating a woman?>i feel like the core of your issue is that you're experiencing loneliness due to a variety of factors. maybe you're ugly, maybe you're poor, maybe you're ND and socially isolated.you probably don't believe my but most of my online friends are girls. I come to these conclusions after talking to them about their own lived experiences and how different they are. my best friend is a girl with a very similar experience to my own, except she's a lesbian while I'm a straight male. and even she acknowledges that, as a straight male it's infinitely harder for me to find a mate than for her given our shared problems(social anxiety, low income, needing a caretaker gf, etc) because people are just more accepting of "girlfailures". I think it's reasonable to want to have a discussion on male loneliness without someone needing to say "but what about the heckin femcels???" like bro that's an entirely different topic and we can talk about it but at least acknowledge my grievances and show me some empathy first instead of deflecting to your own issues.>>85418314>acknowledging your experiences are not exclusive to men won't kill youI have no problem doing that but I also acknowledge that the experiences are totally different. No woman would ever consider using me as a "rebound". No woman would let me approach her without calling the police. That is something reserved exclusively for your kind. You could at least acknowledge your own privileges man.
>>85418289>this guy had no girls falling for him. he was ND, shorter than me, nerdy, ugly, unwashed, had acne, bad teeth, unflattering glasses, cheap clothes, and no friends. very, very, stereotypical nerd. you're defaulting to your default perception of reality ("me want chad") because you can't cope with the fact that men also hate ugly NDs, even when they too are ugly and ND.my apologies if I made an incorrect assumption but "normal" low status people don't just go out of their way to call someone else ugly for no reason. the story just doesn't make sense to me. low status individuals are usually obsessed with protecting themselves from ridicule. a man going out of his way to harass a female classmate is a quick way to get ostracized by the entire rest of his class for the remainder of the year and possibly rest of his school life. even ugly females get the benefit of the protectiveness society feels towards woman by default, hell I was personally ostracized for my argumentative nature in school while not being mean to anyone, just because girls "found me annoying". there's no fucking way a low status male would signal to the rest of his class that he should be bullied by harassing a girl. this shit just doesn't happen bro you must've picked a really bad moid to crush on.have you ever approached someone who is conventionally kindhearted and equally lonely? because I literally cannot think of a single example of being this cruel to a woman before and I imagine most incels are similar and just desperately want affection no matter what kind of girl it's from.
>>85418343i refuted basically all of your arguments w empirical evidence before we moved into a conversation about anecdotal experiences. what are you talking about?
>>85418349empirical evidence is just you citing statistics at me, which is a very tiring argumentative style to engage with tbqh. I'm not interested in statistic peddling. "90% of crime is committed by blacks" does not justify racism. "41% of trannies kill themselves" does not justify transphobia. I just don't see why so many people online choose to reject human connection in favor of citing statistics. anecdotes and personal experiences are more important to a person's social development than statistics. you can cite all the statistics in the world at someone about cars being safe, but if they have a car crash they'll still be scared of getting in a car. please show some empathy for your fellow humans and engage with them on a personal level instead of just being a redditor about it. I understand the whole "feels vs reals" thing is kinda cringe to have to spell out, but this is a reason modern therapy doesn't rely on just citing statistics at patients. it's just not useful information when a person's lived experience falls outside the statistical orthodoxy. and these days, the statistics are so heavily biased and politicized that many people just won't trust them either and all you can rely on is your own experiences and the experiences of those you trust. we are living in a post-truth world, and in this climate true human connection is the most valuable thing we can ask for.
>>85418348>. a man going out of his way to harass a female classmate is a quick way to get ostracized by the entire rest of his class for the remainder of the year and possibly rest of his school life.completely incorrect, people get away with bullying ugly autistics literally all the time. i was in a friend group of three other low status and unattractive women and we were all insulted fairly frequently, by both boys and girls. do you think that women and girls just don't experience social exclusion or bullying? what world are you living in?>have you ever approached someone who is conventionally kindhearted and equally lonely? do you think i seek out unkind men? obviously i only approached people i thought of as kind, intelligent, interesting, and attractive (even if they were not conventionally attractive.) it's actually how my attraction to nd and 'incelish' men started. i was influenced by films like edward scissorhands where autistic socially outcasted men fall in love with the women who treat them kinder than everyone else into fantasizing that i could meet a man as lonely as me and if i were just kind enough, he'd adore me and we'd live happily ever after. in reality, that kind of thing only happens to attractive (and typically neurotypical) women, a nuance i didn't grasp. i know that now because the way all men treat me has completely changed. i haven't been fully disillusioned from the ND incel/fakecel fantasy though. somewhere out there, i agree with you, it is possible to meet a genuinely kind man who has experienced the same things i have. i just roll my eyes at the guys who can go through this and think women will never understand. why would i want to be with someone who would invalidate my experiences and ask me why i never just fucked an ugly stranger to get it over with? >>85418363this is the same copy and paste cope all people do when disproven in an argument. you might as well have said this about the earth being flat.
>>85418370>this is the same copy and paste cope all people do when disproven in an argument. you might as well have said this about the earth being flat.at no point did I ever even engage in your statistic mongering arguments, it just doesn't interest me. I could post charts at you all day long about hypergamy and heightcels, but you've seen it all before so why would I bother? I'm sharing my own lived experience because it's something unique I can add to the convo. statistics are for scientific journals not r9k.>do you think i seek out unkind men?not consciously, but I find it hard to believe there are this many evil men in the world and you just happen to randomly stumble upon them. my friend group alone has like a half dozen men who put women on a pedestal, especially nerdy left-wing women, but none of these men are getting approached by "ugly nerdy girls". I've been friends with the same dudes for like 10+ years and we've all been perpetually lonely with occasional e-gf's. what are you doing to encounter so many men who actively make fun of you? I've spent the better part of like 3 years trying to help my femcel lesbo friend "level up" into a stacy and encouraging her with learning makeup and fashion, so believe me if I was just looking for hot girls I wouldn't be wasting my time doing this.I think from talking to you I kind of have an idea why you're forever alone though, you have a habit of missing the forest for the trees and just wanting to argue instead of hearing the other person's pov. This only appeals to people who are shallow themselves and just want to argue back rather than connecting. Kind people will kind of tune out because they don't have it in them to type up multiple paragraphs to change your mind on a topic when they just wanted to be your friend. Only narcissists give enough of a shit to do that. So it could explain why you constantly encounter bad moids if you're repelling all the good ones, idunno.
holy shit this thread is embarrassing. i have some kind of condition where i feel the need to word vomit all my ills to people who dgaf. my social ineptitude likely had a lot more to do with me getting bullied than my appearance, if i'm honest with myself. they were probably just detecting my psychotic retardation on arrival. i haven't gotten this invested in a 4chan argument in years.>>85418407>you're just an evil narcissist ok lol
>women won't have sex with me because of societal psyops and hypergamy, it has nothing to do with my behavior>ummmmmm ok femcel have you considered that men just didn't like you because of your personality? just take a shower :/
>>85418439that's not what I said. I said her problem is she pursues bad men. not that men won't have sex with her. she could post her discord in this thread and a dozen men would add her with the intention of pair bonding and probably hundreds more with the intention of casual sex.women really do have such a "let them eat cake" approach when it comes to incels. they assume everyone just like casually has access to companionship and it's just a matter of how low you're willing to settle lol. jfc.
>>85418443i am a completely introverted and non-confrontational person irl, i only get into these kinds of arguments online. besides being socially stunted due to autism i am a fairly kind and gentle person. i've never been described as mean or narcissistic by anyone in my life. and again a lot of these interactions were happening with guys i barely knew or didn't speak to at all. i just feel like you're trying to find some reason to say i'm special and different for being unappealing. like i was just ugly and autistic. no my life wasn't a constant carousel of being tortured by ugly men. it's just that people of both genders were pretty repulsed by the idea of dating or having sex with me. is that really so hard to believe?>just post your discordlmao you think i haven't posted here or on soc before? spoiler: 90% of the people on this website are racist and i'm black. the closest thing i got to a compliment on my appearance from a man was a rape threat.
