Ick! You whiney boys are just still upset because women chose the bear.Look, I made a state chart so stop complaining because one women did one thing that was bad. It could of been any woman, that's.why unlike you unempathetic incels, women can actually.understand and relate to the REAL victim of this story!
>>85422119I haven't been in the mood to whine about women for awhile now, women are so plastic and malleable by literally anything I sometimes wonder if the majority even have agency over their own actionsIt's come down to focusing just on the replacement populations and how they're the source of basically all of these problems. Women will fix themselves if they think that's the general spirit of the week. Women will fill the stands for a Hitler speech if the papers say he's the wokest. They'll jump on a funeral pyre of their dead husband if their circle of gossip thinks that accords the greatest religious merit. They'll even picrel. I am glad women exist because they must be able to see and point out such obviously naked masculine flaws of ours which would otherwise be quite opaque to us, the way we can point out their feminine flaws to them. If we actually listen to each other and do the dragon ball fusion dance then we'd be unstoppable.
>>85422119I want to fuck the shit outta that smug, bratty cat, bros.
>>85422119Wow I had no clue women loved murding children so much. I guess the only thing stopping them from being violent and horrible is a lack of physical ability
>>85422217>I haven't been in the mood to whine about women for awhile now, women are so plastic and malleable by literally anything I sometimes wonder if the majority even have agency over their own actions.So, most people struggle with agency. Most people are not reflective. Most people will continue pursuing patterns set in them in childhood until they decide to be honest with themselves and make those patterns conscious. It is not an easy process. It is often painful and can turn your current life on its head. It is not encouraged by society at large. For creatures like us, who take more comfort in the familiar than pretty much anything else, this task is destabilizing. I decided to see if there was any data on this, and this is some of what I found:Meta-analyses (Eagly & colleagues) found women showed somewhat higher conformity than men, especially in group-pressure situations with surveillance (someone watching whether you conform), but the effect sizes were small (.15-.3). Milgrim's classic obedience studies found no gender differences at all. Eagly has a whole body of work about "social role theory," as alternative to pure biological sex differences. The core idea: observed differences between men and women aren't primarily about biology, but about the social roles people get pushed into and the stereotypes those roles create. These are rooted historically in physical differences like men's greater average strength and women's role in pregnancy and nursing, which shaped an early division of labor that became institutionalized into social expectations. Another meta analysis (Eagly & Wood), found that sex differences show up across a range of social behaviors (aggression, helping behavior, nonverbal behavior interaction styles in task-oriented groups), and that these patterns fit a social-role account emphasizing the causal role of gender-based beliefs about appropriate behavior, more than an innate-difference account. (1/2)
>>85422217>>85422503Later formulations between Eagly and Wood describe a "biosocial" approach where hormonal factors (testosterone, oxytocin) interact with cultural role expectations, and where human biology sets a range of possibilities rather than a fixed outcome. People actively shape gender relations rather than just passively expressing biology.So, according to studies, man are, on average, more likely to prioritize appearing independent/high-status; women are, on average, somewhat more concerned with group harmony. But, everyone is usually just living out the life given to them, the roles expected of them or conditioned into them. Men are socially encouraged to be more independent, women are socialized to take care of a group. That doesn't mean men actually have more agency over their actions. I'd even argue that it provides an illusion of agency, as the role was pre-assigned to them and they don't analyze why they are the way they are. >I am glad women exist because they must be able to see and point out such obviously naked masculine flaws of ours which would otherwise be quite opaque to us, the way we can point out their feminine flaws to them. If we actually listen to each other and do the dragon ball fusion dance then we'd be unstoppable.I heavily agree with this, though. I am glad there are balancing forces. (2/2)
>>85422508This is fascinating Thanks for the effortpost anon
>>85422244Be gone from here. Pernicious caitiff.
