I see what you're doing, you know.
Based Jung. What a beast.
>stares you in the eyes I know.>unzips dick
>>85432609he really is the GOAT. though I've been getting into Bergson a little bit just the other dayhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNw_FGWKyLY
>>85432604Elaborate please, anon. What is it that you know?
>>85432641If you like Jung, then I trust your tastes. I'll look into the guy. I know very little about him.
>>85432604I don't give a fuck. Put a knife in your jugular.
>>85432604What, you're going to stop me? Psh, nothing personnel, pseud. I have so many things to show you.
>>85432660I actually barely know anything about him either but I've been having a lot of my own wild thoughts and he mapped onto some of them. whitehead would be a bigger name but all the shit about harmonics and resonance is clearly onto something.I think there are deeper unconventional notions of time that may play a role in reality, but irrespective of anything else the FREQUENCY at which a process operates is clearly fundamentally important at a level that feels stronger than everyday notions of before and after, which is less important than we think. but I do think personification and narrative are inescapable if we want to actually understand what may exist far from our own timescales, math won't give you a complete picture.but what I really need is to find someone who wrote about the fundamental importance of noise, that seems like it's really just my own thing for now (in the specific direction I'm taking it anyway).
>>85432604Like what you see bby?
>>85432774>need is to find someone who wrote about the fundamental importance of noiseHave you heard of Michel Serres and his theory of "le bruit de fond" (background noise)?
