It's funny watching women act like being made to be housewives in the past was some horrible act of misogynistic cruelty, when if you gave most men the option of having the same treatment they'd be more than happy to take it.>you're banned from working a real job, the workplace is no place for a man>you need to stay at home to cook/clean for your wife and raise the kids while she acts as the family breadwinner
>>85434032It was pretty interesting seeing how many of them realized they were happier staying at home during the lockdowns.
Being a stay-at-home father would be amazing. It's too bad foids won't allow it despite so many of them being handed high-paying do-nothing """jobs"""
>>85434032It's not about that. It's about being barred from the opportunity to be anything more than that. To have a choice in who she married. To not be beholden to either a father or husband she didn't choose her entire life. To be able to explore the world and themselves as all the men were allowed to do. No wonder women as a collective are so underdeveloped. They have not had nearly as long as men to get their shit together.
>>85434032The issue is that women are extremely difficult to cater to and far too capricious to ever be happy with anything you do. A man can be satisfied when his wife isn't obese, cooks edible food, has sex with him sometimes and doesn't nag him. Women simply cannot be satisfied mentally, often not even because she wants "too much", but because what she wants changes on waves of hormonal interference.Have you ever tried cooking for women consistently? Much like with men, they work backwards with their ideal outcome. First, they imagine being happy and a perfect meal, then fill in the spaces of what elements they think will make them happy (based on consumed media) instead of what is practical, reasonable or necessary. They are never satisfied and nothing is ever what they want.
>>85434178I remember reading somewhere that the feminine finds problems and masculine fixes them. I think the dynamic makes sense in harmony.
>turning some incel into the perfect househusband moidservanthot...
can we just force a matriarchy already? i'm tired of breadwinning, just let me be a jobless househusband already.
>>85434032>if you gave most men the option of having the same treatment they'd be more than happy to take it.This is actually the way things are rn. More women in the workforce and men at home, but other (probably jealous) men make fun of stay at home husbands for being comfy NEETs. https://youtube.com/shorts/2Ll9jPS3M6E?si=9Cu-Azq4qbT68LQ6
>tfw actually enjoy cooking and cleaning and taking care of peopleI should've became a butler when I had the chance.
>>85434032Nothing is funnier than women being cucked into believing being a wageslave for Mr. Goldbergenstein is better than being at home with your children and watching soap operas
>>85434032To be generous it was legitimately hard work being a housewife prior to inventions such as washing machines and indoor plumbing. Of course it was also hard work that the men were doing, just a different kind. Neither men nor women were free in feudal times. If we're talking the mid 20th century, both men and women were better off and happier than they are now. Women did have paid jobs more than modern people think as well, but it was typically basic stuff like being a typist to earn a bit before they had children, not a long-term career.>>85434196>the feminine finds problemsThe problem is when they can't find problems, they create them.
>>85434461They thought when they went into work they'd girlboss their way into becoming the Wolf of Wall Street. Instead they end up in a do-nothing middle management job hopped up on more medication than a chemo patient.It's like how pooners always think they'll become a tall muscular Chad when they transition, and they end up getting depressed when they end up as a fat hairy manlet instead.
