[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: fig1.gif (62 KB, 488x478)
62 KB GIF
As in, they're familiar with the anatomy, the procedure itself, and the changes in function?
It seems like 99% of the
>I'm glad it was done when I was a baby
aren't aware that their prepuce, which was firmly attached to the glans at birth, was forcibly RIPPED away from it before being excised, leaving glans bloody and ultimately scarred.
They don't know anything about the rigid band or sensory innervation of the excised tissue.
A lot of them are surprised to learn that lotion isn't mandatory for masturbation.
I'm not sure how much of the ignorance is just cope, but it's pretty telling that the least informed tend to be the least bothered by it.
>>
I have a foreskin so I don't 100% care
>>
>>85434244
It's not even are there any fully-informed men who are OK with it; I'm surprised the default response to the circumcisionblackpill isn't to immediately just LDAR, at least until stem cel tech is perfected.
>>
My bf uses lotion and complains of discomfort without even though he has foreskin. He also bled on his first time because his frenulum snapped and that kinda traumatized him away from sex in general.
I wonder if he would be better off circumsized as currently his head is way too sensitive from being coddled in foreskin too much, even taking it out for wash is uncomfortable to him.
>>
>>85434938
>He also bled on his first time
you took his maidenhead lmao
>>
>>85434244
Some are sociopathic demons and retarded on top

The others are ignorant
>>
>>85435004
It wasn't me unfortunately, it was some obese older girl when he was 14
>>
>>85434244
my doesn't like the fact that he's circumcised, but my parents didn't choose to circumcise him, he got attacked by some freak who stabbed him in the groin
>>
i find it hilarious that the romans 2000 years ago outlawed circumcision because they viewed it as a barbaric and inhumane practice even back then, yet todays amerimutts think its all fine and good
really makes you tihnk
>>
File: Ack 5.jpg (67 KB, 844x1022)
67 KB JPG
>>85434938
Nobody cares what you two fags do, tranny
>>
>>85434244
I was circumcized as a baby because my mom is a retard and I sort of go back and forth between hating it and tolerating it. I know masturbating will never feel as good as it should. Sex feels fine but I'm not a super sexual person anyway.

I think I have a good looking cut cock, not much scarring
>>
>>85435860
But it is an important evidence that just because one has foreskin doesn't mean sex/masterbation will feel better
>>
File: ack copter.gif (820 KB, 1540x1222)
820 KB GIF
>>85435912
Sex doesn't feel good because you have a putrid axe wound instead of a vagina, troon
>>
File: 1727565690251.gif (18 KB, 220x134)
18 KB GIF
>>85434244
>noooo you can't just amputate my disgusting prepuce before I even remember it!
>>
>>85434244
>Are ANY men OK with circumcision actually well-informed about it?
how could they be? the facts are too damning.
>genuinely 0 benefit, all benefits cited are akin to IF YOU CUT OFF YOUR FEET YOU CAN'T GET BLISTERS
>the procedure is done on infants without anesthetic for no good reason; if you want to claim that anesthetic is dangerous for infants, then postpone the circumcision until adulthood
>it's done on infants who can't consent, so no matter how good you believe circumcision is, it's evil to inflict it on someone who might not want it

Circumcision being done without anesthetic is the same as how they geld animals and burn cows' horns off with no anesthetic. Do you know why? Because it's cheaper and they can't say no.
Treating babies like cattle is so fucking evil, even if you believe the circumcision is actually beneficial (and it provably fucking isn't).
>>
File: 1786754724809035.jpg (21 KB, 334x395)
21 KB JPG
>>85436692
>pic
demon doctors when you tell them to fuck off

Circumcision is a satanic practice. It is satanic because yahweh (his other names are satan and the devil) ordered it. There's so much evidence in the Bible:
https://xenosarc.substack.com/p/yahweh-the-god-of-the-old-testament
>>
the only people who I've ever seen argue in favour of this mutilation is dudes who've already been cut. They are like people with Stockholm syndrome, arguing in favour of their captors / mutilators



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.