[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: be-strong.png (918 KB, 1200x1110)
918 KB PNG
I live in a van without a smartphone and I havent talked to a woman in 10 years. In my opinion I won the game and I'm now free and healthy. People online think I'm a loser and ridicule me. Anons told me
>yeah but you live in a van
like that's an argument. What's wrong with living in a van, faggot? You probably couldn't even afford a van and if you could, you'd be too stupid to fix it (without your AI overlord) and too weak to survive a night in it.

But that's not my point. That's not why I'm here. My point is that capitalism is a broken system. First off, it's not meritocratic. There are guys less handsome than me and have a gf. There are people less competent than me who got the job I wouldn't have gotten. I'm not unemployed and living in a van because I failed - society failed me. I'm currently writing a book about "survivorship bias" and other psychological phenomena that deluded people into thinking the system is fair and your position in it is a result of your fitness. No. Some of the laziest, dumbest and least competent people live in a penthouse and the smartest and fittest live under a bridge.
The ultimate purpose of my book is to prove to society that we need UBI - now. Most likely nobody will publish this book but I still think this is more important work than going to schools so I can chase some imaginary job.
>>
Civilization is a team sport, if you cant get along with people then you arent the most fit for the job. Idc how good you are at math if working with you makes me want to suckstart a shotgun or kill you, which based off this and your last thread it certainly would.
>>
I like that you think you're better than anyone but you keep making this thread night after night for validation. You're not better, you're desperate lolll
>>
>>85434572

Look, zoom-zoom, the problem is that there aren't enough jobs to begin with. The number of job opening goes down every day and the number of applicants goes up.
Stop blaming the people who don't get the jobs. It's all favoritism and nepotism. I could almost accept this "game of musical chairs" if it was about IQ or math skills like you put it because that would at least be fair, but right now it's just "I like this person", "I know this person" and that's the least fair system.
>>
>>85434573
I post this time and time again because your generation is so stupid. Gen z is the first generation that is dumber than the one before it.
I'm a millenial, the smartest generation in human history.
I feel that it's my responsibility to educate you and help you because you clearly can't tell right from wrong.
You think there are 3 genders, you think LGBT is good, you think capitalism is fair, you think tech is good... no, all of that is wrong.
>>
>>85434572
>if working with you makes me want to suckstart a shotgun or kill you, which based off this and your last thread it certainly would.

Why does it make you hostile when someone proves that your beloved system is broken?
Do you love the system so much?
You defend it because it gives you gibs?
>>
>>85434548
If you were actually serious about all this, you'd make a single thread to state your point and leave this site for good afterwards. You should be getting a good rest right now so you can be ready to hunt tomorrow's dinner. Instead, you're staying up late and arguing with random strangers on the internet, which uses the same technology that you claim to hate so much. The truth that you won't admit is that you're having second thoughts on all of this and need other people to reaffirm your beliefs.
>>
>>85434548
>Most likely nobody will publish this book
You have access to the internet right now OP. That's incredible in and of itself. If you're serious and this is not a bait post, learn about KDP. You don't need to pay to publish your book to Amazon, it's free, and you get royalties for page reads even if it's not necessarily a sale.
>>
>>85434548
You are an idiot, and If you were truly free you wouldn't be posting in this shithole.
You are the equivalent of a 45 yo single woman posting on social media about how happy she is.
>>
File: 1761364497952378.jpg (121 KB, 750x848)
121 KB JPG
>>85434548
Okay your highness
Must be nice being rich
>>
>>85434724

I'm OP and I'm still waiting for a single argument to refute my points.
So far 100% of posts have been attacks against ME and my person - not my ideals.

I'm here because I want to save you guys. You need to join my tribe of people who will exit society.
Do you really want to live in a zero trust society with Pride year and everything?
There's no fixing society, you can only start a new one.
>>
>>85434735
This pic is spot on.
That's how capitalism works. Everything gets more scarce and expensive over time and you have to settle for less.
This is why I'm telling people to abandon society NOW so you wont find yourself living in a capsule hotel in 2050.
If you leave society now, you might have a nice cabin in the woods at least.
>>
>>85434756
So let me get this straight, you don't like how society works right now which is understandable I feel the same way, but instead of killing people responsible for that, we should flee the cities built by hard working people from lower class like us, we should leave all the good stuff helping you and making your life more pleasurable to these cunts not deserving that and start over in forest risking a new cunts taking over with time doing the same? That's my only problem, people are fucking weak and "no no guys let's get away from them it's not worth it" I don't want to leave fruits of my labor, I want to kill people who dare to reach for it.
>>
>>85434548
You laid it all out for us, I could never know what you do. Can you please teach me your wisdom so I can live in a van just like you, instead of my million dollar house? I feel duped for not figuring out the real important things like you.
>>
>>85434878
Good post. Your approach has some problems which I will briefly list:

1. "Killing the people in charge" isn't just difficult but there are also some moral issues with killing.
2. You're right in recognizing that people are weak. I always get shit for telling people they're weak, but they are. It's not my mistake, it's theirs. But this same weakness has resulted in the current situation where people know they're slaves but they will not do a thing about it. Nobody will EVER rise and fight the elite. Remember Occupy Wall Street? That was our best shot at taking them down. We are now 100 times weaker and less proactive than back then.
3. Divide and conquer has made it sure that you'll never gather more than a couple of people to join your cause, whether it's peaceful or violent resistance. This way you'll be singled out as just a single terrorist, as was the plan.

I know it sounds defeatist to run off to the woods but I have thought about it a lot.
>it's the most moral choice: nobody dies
>people will more easily get behind a peaceful solution
>when the population hears that some people are actually escaping from society, this sends an important signal to the people. they will realize that things are so bad that some people feel the need to escape. this part I could not stress more
>I personally think that the game is so over that you can only start anew. to fix the world you would have to re-think capitalism, not just replace the people in charge.


>>85434890
If you think Ferraris and mansions are the end goal of all end goals, we have nothing to discuss. Come back when you're no longer 15.
>>
Your writing style and approach is too confrontational and belittling considering this is probably the only group of people who might be receptive to your ideas.
Pls buy picrel, I'll even buy it for you if you put up an Amazon wishlist link for it. I think you would appreciate the message. Just gift it to someone else after reading
>>
>>85435068

>Your writing style and approach is too confrontational and belittling considering this is probably the only group of people who might be receptive to your ideas.

I'm OP and I know, but I'm not trying to be an asshole on purpose though. It's more like, I don't want to start smiling and luring people into my society because it's not a product. I'm not selling anything. I don't need to learn marketing gimmicks to get new members because I'm giving stuff to people for free. I'm not asking anything of them except grit
I'm currently trying to buy a forest with 50 cabins in it and I'll just let the first 50 people live in them rent-free so you can probably see why I'd feel like a jackass begging people to accept free housing.
>>
>>85435068
>Pls buy picrel, I'll even buy it for you if you put up an Amazon wishlist link for it.

I dont have an Amazon account or any other social media
They just steal your data
>>
>>85434572
I'm not good at math and people either avoid me when they can or look like they want to suckstart a shotgun when interacting
>>
>>85435068
>dont be angry at bad guys

That's like saying I should take responsibility for what the pedo elite is doing and just fix the issues they should fix
>>
>>85435221
More or less. Collective action is the only way forward; secluding yourself in the woods and hoping TPTB don't fly a plane over your house or cut down the forest you live in is just cope.
>>
>>85435189
This clarifies things somewhat. Not sure I'd want the type who are responsive to the tactics deployed. It takes all kinds I guess. It's a really book, you might know most of it already but it's useful to give to your cult members once you are in place.
>>85435194
Fair enough, I try to avoid buying from them is general. It's a way to give books out without giving a vanrapist your real name, only pseudonym. Pirate and disseminate as epub if you like the book.
>>85435221
The book is literally about addressing the point you made, and strongly refutes it how many cops, lawyers, bankers, politicians, and judges have you lynched? I'd put money on it being the same amount I have lynched.
I'm still angry, but at least now I'm angry and doing things that only carry a small chance of suicide two bullets back of the head style. Anger has a purpose. If you aren't removing the source of the problem you can at least try to mitigate how much damage they do. That's what this book offers. Every little bit you do counts
>>
>>85435189
>I'm currently trying to buy a forest with 50 cabins in it and I'll just let the first 50 people live in them rent-free so you can probably see why I'd feel like a jackass begging people to accept free housing.
You say you're unemployed, how will you afford this? How long will you keep this running? Will you pay taxes or cover water bills or maintenance? It's very unlikely you'll ever be a best-seller if you write a book.
Some people tried a camping forest commune in China a while ago and they got fucked by the government hard for it after making TikTok videos about it. I can't find a link to the news article I saw anymore but I didn't bother looking too far.
Your whole stance reminds me of Exiting Modernity except more schizo.
>>
>>85435194
Learn to pirate books on IRC or use (((https://annas-archive.gd))), save the schizo ramblings about amazon and your data for /g/
>>
>>85435300

>You say you're unemployed, how will you afford this?
Kickstarter or some other funding site.

>How long will you keep this running? Will you pay taxes or cover water bills or maintenance?
The community is self-sustaining, gets its power and water from a local creek.
The idea of my community is to try out "donut economics" in the real world, meaning we only use tech to a point where our immediate surroundings can recover from its use. This is the only way for humanity to ever live, meaning we have lived wrong for thousands of years. I want to correct this because it's the only rational solution to everything.

>Some people tried a camping forest commune in China
>China
Well there you go. China executed thousands of innocent students in Tiananmen square in 1989 simply because they wanted democracy. Never forget.

>Your whole stance reminds me of Exiting Modernity except more schizo.
I find it jarring that some people find real human life "schizo life". Meanwhile you're sitting in front of a glowing screen 12 hours per day.
>>
>>85435319

Why do people think it's schizo to use FOSS?
I once tried to explain a woman why I dont like Tiktok and it was like trying to make a colorblind person see red and green
>>
>>85434548
If you live in a van and have no smartphone then how are you posting on the internet?
Where does your water come from to take showers?
>>
>>85434958
Theres no moral issues with killing tge problems and theres no moral issues with collateral damage either.
>>
If I had believable guarantee of life and such I would take infinite time perception full dive vr pleasure cube. I'm not leaving the internet and video games behind to be a hunter gatherer anarchist. The only thing appealing about van life and such is that its affordable enough to not make me a debt slave.
>>
>>85434548
people who write books nobody wants to read self publish
>>
>capitalism is broken because it's not meritocratic enough
at least on other boards tedposters sometimes have read him. on /r9k/ every single post using ted i've ever seen is either totally irrelevant or against everything he believed
>>
Without pics, I'm going to assume this is a larp, anyway

>What's wrong with living in a van, faggot?
If you like it, nothing I guess, personally I wouldn't do it.
>You probably couldn't even afford a van and if you could, you'd be too stupid to fix it
If you thing a van is some sort of luxury then you're the poorfag here, and I doubt you can do anything but basic repairs
>too weak to survive a night in it.
You don't need to be strong to live like a hobo.
>First off, it's not meritocratic. There are guys less handsome than me and have a gf. There are people less competent than me who got the job I wouldn't have gotten
Sounds like a (You) problem.
> I'm currently writing a book about "survivorship bias" and other psychological phenomena that deluded people into thinking the system is fair and your position in it is a result of your fitness. No. Some of the laziest, dumbest and least competent people live in a penthouse and the smartest and fittest live under a bridge.
You haven't uncovered any hidden truth, anyone that isn't retarded knows that. No matter what you do you are not going to free yourself from the system and you aren't going to change it. Also you are neither one of the smartest or the fittest, same goes for anyone t hat lieves under a bridge.

Assuming you are into somethign this just reads like teenage angst with little to no substance underneath.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.