I am still annoyed how no antinatilist has explained me, how ones suffering is morally valued more than the others>>side 1.>I suffer because I didn't ask to be born>>>VS>>side 2.>I suffer because I want to reproduce>I suffer cause I want to be cared for at my old age>I suffer because knowing others are reproducing eliviates my existential dreadHow do you count which suffering is worst. In a situation where both parties interests collide how do decide who is in the right >inb4 do your research If ypu understood something you could explain it simply>inb4 some selective natalist who thinks they are antinatalist responds to meI am talking about antinatilism no selective natalism
And the existential dread pain is also because we humans have empathy so we care about the intrest of people we haven't met as a concept
>>85437995Why do you think it matters which is worse?Suffering in some form is universal regardless. Makes no difference if some suffering is better or worse than others. It would be better if none of it existed regardless.
>>85438303Doesn't answer to what I said
85438317nta, but it doesnt matter, you're arguing in bad faith anyway. what does it matter to you if someone chooses not to reproduce? if you care *this* much, then just have more kids yourself to offset the non-breeders. no one gives a shit.
You don't reply even when I answer seriously. Page 11ed. So instead, shut up and stop spamming.
