>>85438958
>Some men believe it is good for men to be promiscuous.
No it's not. Nobody should be promiscuous, it's a terrible lifestyle. It's just a series of hook-ups and break-ups, and all those break-ups make at least one person sad. Promiscuity creates sadness.

>But also that no man should marry a non virgin
If a man is a non-virgin, then it's best if he marries a non-virgin.
If a man is a virgin, then it's best if he marries a virgin.

Both men and women should strive to be virgins until they meet their one true life partner. I know that's not always possible, and I know that some people are driven to be promiscuous, but hopefully as many people as possible can be virgins when they meet their life partner. That would maximize the amount of happiness.

>>85438958
Even if you personally wanted no sex before marriage, other guys are gonna crack the virgins anyway, therefore you might as well partake yourself.

Any plan that requires a whole gender cooperating is completely unrealistic

>>85438958
first point
>the ratio of young men to young women is uneven, with men below 60 vastly outnumbering women
>1.01 men are born for every woman but women live longer so overall the ratio evens out because most boomers are women
>there is not someone for everyone and a lot of men will have to die alone
second point
>the men who believe it is good for men to be promiscuous are whores and should be vilified by society just as much as promiscuous women are but unfortunately our society is retarded
>it is more common for men to be virgins these days than it is for women to be virgins, so it is impossible for all men to marry a virgin
>most men who marry will inevitably be cucks with little to no experience who will have to come to terms their wife's slutty past

>>85439283
Therefor ypu are depriving other men from marriage in your logic