Why are people with darker skin consistently poorer and less successful than those with lighter skin? Spain and Portugal are poorer than Norway and Switzerland. Mexico and Brazil are poorer than Argentina and Uruguay. and Thailand and Vietnam are poorer than South Korea and Japan.
Do not lump me in with the fucking Indian you disgusting piece of shit.
I don't knowmelanin on the brain
most ceos in the world are indians and they are darker than the sub saharan africans
Because Colorism.
>>85455890Light skin evolves in pops living far away from the equator in environments with four seasons and harsh winters. In such environments, planning the future, delayed gratification, investing in your offspring, cooperation, problem solving are much much more important than they are in lush forests with food all year round, so these got also selected for alongside light skin.
>>85455890white societies have hoarded so much health and benefited off industrialization so their societies just generate more than any swarthy country could ever do. It makes sense that money stays within their race, so wherever they go the money follows.
>>85455898>CEO saar!and people wonder why things have been enshittified and mismanaged
>>85455890racism and lookism
>>85455935You fear the indian bull
>>85455913I explained this to my boomer dad and he laughed his assed off
>>85455890Southern Euros are less pure Euro than northern euros. That's why they're darker, they've got a chunk of Arab too.
>>85455890For East Asia anyway, light skin just means they work indoors instead of outdoors. It became a status symbol to have lighter skin, since it meant you were important and had a skilled job rather than peasantry who toiled in hot sun.
Because "whites" would send an army to you to take all your wealth. See: Rome, the fall of Rome, the Spanish Succession, the Austrian Succession, etc, etc.Anyway I don't think it's a true thing. When the Silk Road was a thing, it was the middle east and east that had all the wealth, not Europe.
>>85456072Boomers are fucking stupid and never had to care about a god damn thing in their entire life, and why should they? Not to mention they are quite irresponsible and apathetic to critical scenarios. Horrible generation
>>85455935Skibidi saar six seven
>>85455894Cope brownoid kek
>>85455935I mean he does have a point: all the lightskins bow and give their money and power to brownskins. Why does this always happen?
>>85458224>Why does this always happen?Because the one thing a boomer fears more than his children inheriting his wealth is being called a racist. So he and his fellow White board members appoint a brown CEO. Someone who isn't White. Someone who is devoid of any moral sense and is therefore someone who will screw over White employees without qualm. Someone who will also have no issue doing shady, unethical, if not outright illegal shit. And then when the brownoid has served its purpose, it will be cast aside like the CEO of Better not too long ago. In fact, he's the perfect example of what I've just described. Fired 900 Whites over zoom. Then hired 1500 jeets because the one thing a jeet can't abide is working with someone smarter and more talented than them. Which is why they always get rid of the Whites and only hire their own.
>>85455890Honestly, it's the classic combo of personal choices and circumstances. If you're circumstances are shitty enough, you can do everything right, work constantly, and still only end up doing "okay" in life. Meanwhile, if your circumstances are good enough, you can mess up constantly, never work, and end up a champion. Most people fall somewhere in the middle on this spectrum. A brown person born into a family of millionaires is going to do much better than a white person born into a welfare family.
