anons on the left and right
>leftist anons get the girl>rightist anons watchBrave and true
>>85560743From their perspective, she's with the rightist. Says a lot about society, the internet warps our perception of stuff.
>>85560723rightests are going to do one of two things1. marry a han chinese or israeli jew and have beautiful half white high IQ children2. buy eggs from supermodels, add their sperm, and then plant those zygotes in cheap curry niggers that are desperate to see a white baby come out of their vaginaswe are beyond sex with white women.
>>85560754>From their perspectiveFrom who's perspective? They are all looking straight ahead at each other. There is nobody "left or right" from the perspective of the characters. Not to mention that this is irrelevant, because this is a drawing, the perspective it is drawn in is what matters. The artist deliberately chose to have the man with the woman on the left side of the caricature, the incel on the right.
>>85560803>Deluding yourself this thoroughlyCope, they do have a perspective, the girl is looking to her right and we're very clearly seeing her left side. You have to go full in, otherwise we can just pretend they're arbitrary lines and symbols fully up to interpretation and actually mean nothing. It doesn't matter what the artist chose, what emerged out of it is objectively more relevant if we are to properly analyze it.
>>85560839>the girl is looking to her rightNo she isn't. She is looking in front of her. She is facing the person she is dancing with.>what emerged out of it is objectively more relevant if we are to properly analyze it.Objectively, the guy with the girl is on the left of the picture, and the cuck is on the right.
>>85560869wrong, the cuck is on the left because he's going to give all his money to a worthless whore who will cheat on him the entire time with niggers and then divorce rape him. marrying liberal white women is the most cucked thing you can do. as i said in my previous post, the manly thing to do is to get rich and buy genetics better than 99% of white whores.
>>85560869Even if you were to delude yourself into thinking the guy is not to her right, the guy holding her hand is definitely facing to his left, as we can see from how his body is drawn. From his perspective, everyone else is to his left. From the perspective of the lonely dancer, looking to his right, everyone is to his right. Therefore we can deduce the girl chose the one to her right. There's no way around this.
>>85560885>you have to marry a woman to dance with her or fuck her
>>85560929>the guy holding her hand is definitely facing to his leftNo he's also facing forwards.>From the perspective of the lonely dancer, looking to his rightHe isn't looking to his right. He's either looking behind, or in front. His legs face opposite directions so it's ambiguous.>Therefore we can deduce the girl chose the one to her right. I already told you there is nobody to her left or to her right. The 2 men are in front and behind her respectively.
>>85560934be real cuck, as soon as the leftists tastes pussy for the first time in his life he's going to hand over every asset to the woman, and she's going to turn around and give all those assets to Tyrone. thats just how modern women work.
>>85561015No, leftists just have casual sex / ONS every weekend. Conservatives are the ones who believe in "no sex outside of marriage".
>>85560998>No he's also facing forwards.He's facing to his left. The way you keep deluding yourself is embarassing.>His legs face opposite directions so it's ambiguous.No, his feet are pointing inwards, nothing ambiguous about it. His nose is to our left so he's looking to his right.>>85560998>nobody to her left or to her right.It doesn't matter what she sees exactly, we have two clear perspectives with a common ground: she's at the center to both of them. One has her on his left, the other has her on his right. Like in real life, only the opinion of the men matter to figure out the perspective of this image.
>>85561094>He's facing to his left.No he isn't. He's facing the woman head on. They are literally looking at each other directly. Your illustration doesn't provide anything, because it's ambiguous whether his body is facing us (the viewer) with its back or its front. It's a silhouette.>His nose is to our left so he's looking to his right.Again, you can't tell if it's his back or his front that is facing the viewer. Your interpretation hinges entirely on "the perspective of the torso of the men" (not their actual visual perspective, as it is abundantly clear they are all facing each other with their faces head-on), which can't be objectively determined in this drawing. My interpretation is objective: The left(ist) man is dancing with the woman, the right(ist) man is watching them. Yours is subjective, make belief, not based on any factual information expressed in the caricature.
>>85561369Your interpretation fails to acknowledge that whether we're seeing his back or his front, the guy to the right of the picture, his nose is pointing to the left. Therefore the couple is always to the right. All the time. THINK. Why? Imagine in the universe where the picture takes place, they have a camera taking a photo from the viewer's perspective. Okay, we can clearly tell who's left and who's right. Now, from their perspective, facing at said camera, you would need to swipe where 'left' and 'right' is, because in one way or another, they're undoubtedly facing to the camera. The camera is to their front? The couple is to the right. The camera is to their back? Doesn't matter, their subjective perspective has temporarily shifted but the couple still is to the right. They're sideways? Same point. See it now?Furthermore, If they could freely rotate and that's the only thing that dictates their position, then attaching it to a relatively solid concept like left and right politics is meaningless.
>>85561555>Your interpretation fails to acknowledge that whether we're seeing his back or his front, the guy to the right of the picture, his nose is pointing to the left. Therefore the couple is always to the right.I think you genuinely just don't understand how directions or perspectives work.If the man on the right is facing the "camera" with his chest, he's leaning his head to the right relative to his torso (his torso points in the opposite direction of the camera, thus what is "left" in the cameras perspective is "right" from his torso's perspective). If he's facing the camera with his back, he's leaning his head to the left relative to his torso (his torso points in the same direction as the camera, thus "left and right" are the same for both the torso and the camera).>Furthermore, If they could freely rotate and that's the only thing that dictates their position"The only thing that dictates their position is that they can freely rotate"? What are you even saying?>then attaching it to a relatively solid concept like left and right politics is meaningless.It's only meaningless using your subjective interpretation, because determining which man is left of the other man in relation to their subjective perspective is impossible. In my objective interpretation, it is clear who is left and who is right. The man on the left of the picture is left, the man on the right of the picture is right.
>>85562114Okay, let's go by your logic. The picture was fabricated by a leftist so it's still biased. I could mirror the image and claim the opposite of what you're claiming and thus be right. Fin
>>85562132It's not "my logic", it's just "logic". You are not in disagreement with "me", you are in disagreement with reality, as is usual with your ilk.
>>85562254I literally just proved your image can be easily twisted to render your point meaningless. You're literal cattle if you can't comprehend my meta-counter to your crappy logic.
>>85562295>If I change the image, the image portrays something differentWhat an incredibly insightful "meta-counter".
If you posted this image 100% seriously you are a gay retarded faggot nigger with no personality. Simple as.
>>85562314>If I portray a nigger dancing with a woman and he's to the left, he's a leftist, hehBrother, have the slightest bit of self-awareness. Your post is utterly retarded.
>>85562326You were making the inverse argument, on the same premise. Only after you realized that you can't "win" that way, because you've been thoroughly refuted, did you attack the premise itself. You're just a sore loser. And I think >>85561555 takes the cake for the most utterly retarded post in this thread. With that post you exposed yourself as having no spatial awareness whatsoever.
>>85561041Most leftist men are virgins who have never tasted pussy in their lives and they're going to die that way because they're spiritually faggots.
>>85562454Okay yeah sure, a retarded reply for a retarded thread, we're just competing to see who gets more retarded at this point. My first reply was just troll contrarianism, I just played along because I found it amusing. You're taking this way more seriously than it needs to be.
>>85562488I believe you were taking things much more serious than I was. I was merely arguing about the premise of the image / which interpretations of the image are sound and which are unsound. While you on the other hand suddenly started arguing about the legitimacy of the image as an argument in favor of leftist politics. Obviously it's just some meme image, it's not a statistic or anything.
