I posted this on /pol/ and they unanimously called it "fake news jooish propaganda" and that women prefered intelligent men with moneyWhat does /r9k/ think?
>>85564426>r=.-36Not significant lol.
>>85564431r squared is the correlation, significance has to do with the p value
>>85564475The p-value is the probability that something is coincidental. r value is correlation, which can be insignificant. Any two variables will have an r-value. Statisticians usually want to see R values exceeding 0.8
Wait, you need studies to tell you that women find attractive men attractive?I think the bigger scandal is why so many men are so ugly
>>85564490>Statisticians usually want to see R values exceeding 0.8That depends on the field of study you silly neetFor the social sciences 0.3-0.5 is good
>>85564493And yet chudcels still deny what the studies sayThey think one day, when they have enough money, they'll stop being invisible to women
>>85564426Both of these things can be true. Preferences are not a switch or even a single sliding scale
How do you objectively measure attractiveness? All women have different tastes in men. That's pure bullshit.
Attractiveness is correlated with status, money, intelligence, who comes up with this retarded shit?
>>85564558Why do you cope so?
>>85564501Spend that money on me instead
/pol/ is filled with these straussian/redpill manosphere right winger male wives, you shouldn't expect any better from actual shills
>>85564576Actually this is wrong, i dislike music, music upsets me. I like quiet.So if i met a hot guy into music i would make him stop doing music and instead we would get proper hobbies like going to restaurants and travel
>>85564568It's nothttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4415372/
