How would you behave if distance from the people you love meant their safety?
>>85565622If I find out who you are consequences will never be the same!
>>85565622I would kill myself for being a bpdemon whore
>>85565622It doesnt mean "their safety", it just means your comfort.
>>85565646Sounds personal. I don't take anything personally. It's unwise.>>85565640lol
Please tell me how to cope with being alone. Or vc with me I am a woman. Cannotpickanametochoose
>>85565656The two are the same. What people think is typically of very little consequence.
>>85565671No, it's not. People that are accepting their maladaptive patterns as their identity are simply not able to participate in a real relationship.
>>85565662Stop meeting people on /soc/ and step into the real world.
>>85565662I don't want to voice chat. We may text spam mega yap random shit.
>>85565676Your scorned feelings don't really reflect reality either. It's not me I'm protecting people from. That's only a portion of the issue. I also don't illogically latch onto people I've only met a few times. That's just co-dependency and not real friendship.
>>85565694That's an interesting read, but I don't have scorned feelings. If you distance yourself from the people you like under the guise of their safety, you're deciding unilaterally for them, for your comfort.
>>85565712You're implying I'm ever comfortable and as if there isn't a real threat when I'm telling you there is.
>>85565726I know you're rarely comfortable which is why these feelings matter so much more than the feelings of your peers. What is the real threat?
>>85565736>these feelings matter so much more than the feelings of your peersThey do not.
the same as i do nowi don't have any irl friends
>>85565741>>85565748You're both unwilling to confront yourself and would rather hide behind excuses.
>>85565622Id have sex with your mother, with or without that, but i had to mention it.
>>85565766I've done more "confronting of self" than you could do in a lifetime and I really didn't have any other choice. If you were to do the same you'd end up with the same conclusion. Especially regarding detachment.>>85565777>
>>85565809I've seen your type often enough to know the only thing you're protecting is your self-hate.
>>85565766well if my friends become suicidal i could respect their bodily autonomy by visiting them i suppose
>>85565821Everyone hates themselves to a certain extent. We are all our own harshest critic. You say this like it isn't true for you but it absolutely is. So you're not above it. Nevertheless, it's only a fraction of the issue. I am not the only constant deciding factor of why detachment is a necessity. And detachment is not a negative thing. It's more objective than attachment. Not completely unobjective. Just more.
>>85565849It's not about everyone, it's about you. And you're choosing to detach well beyond what is necessary, not merely out of empathy, but also out of a defensive pattern keeping your self-hate central.And you haven't told me what real threat there is - because it's all in your head.
>>85565849Question, is it more attachment to get bred by the BLACK BULL or is it more detachment of the cheeks?
>>85565859It's not completely about me. It's 50/50. You (proverbial) can't interact with me on a certain level and I won't bother to lower myself to baseline "human" societal interactions. I don't need to tell you what the threat is. If you're blind to it, that's all the better, and I needn't elaborate further.
>>85565893Touche. A perfect example of how it is all about you, in the end. The boy who cried wolf.I will hide your thread now and will never read any response, for I have said all there is to say.
>>85565906It's about me, but it's not all about me. You're asking for specifics, what would the answer be? The government? Online turbo autists with a chip on their shoulder? Specifically, you? My demonic family? What good does an answer to that do for you? There are threats, more than you or I could begin to know.
