So how exactly can i tell when a certain study or research is legit from when it's a jewish psyop for the goyim?
>>85571177You must repeat the study. A lot of times the study behind articles doesnt support what the article says. So if you are reading some kind of science journalism you should read the sources first.
Read the study to look for biases, potential errors, and look to see who funds it. See what journals the study is published in, and any affiliations that journal may have.
easy, if it conforms to your beliefs it's real, if it doesn't its a jewish psyop
>>85571207This, the thread can end now
>>85571204>>85571205What trustworthy sources do you guys recommend? I follow National Geographic for animal related stuff but i'm not sure about anything else, like psychology or medical fields
>>85571234I wouldn't rely on the reputation of the journal alone, even stuff like peer review don't always guarantee trustworthy information. Look at the journal's impact factor, Wikipedia does a good job of explaining what that ishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_factorAlso check for any journal controversies, and how quickly the paper was submitted and accepted for publication. It typically takes time to get feedback and revise during the peer review process, if it all happened within a few weeks that's not a good sign.
if the sample size is less than 1,000 it's probably horseshit
>>85571177>how exactly can i tell when a certain study or research is legitEasy: none of them is. Science is completely corrupted.
>>85571542Based, science has long since been a jewish tool for brainwashing. We must return to tradition
>>85571486Seems reasonable enough, thank you anon-kun
>>85571827>science>brainwashingAt this point I only trust fellow flat earthers.
