[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: chess.jpg (386 KB, 3000x1993)
386 KB JPG
Should there be a women's division in chess for competitive fairness? I mean the results speak for themselves no?
You can argue women have been historically much less incentivised and allowed to play chess competitively and so on but does this really explain the gap today?
>>
>>85577232
There is (sorta). There are women tournaments which men can't enter, but women can still enter normal tournaments. There's also a woman grandmaster title (wgm), but that's a meme and I'd feel humiliated if I had it desu. I remember a few years ago there were wgms who were lower rated than me as well as millions of other literal nobodies. I'm not sure if it's still as bad, but if I were a woman, I'd petition to get rid of that title for sure.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.