Is there a more pointless extremist movement than radical feminism?Even radical incels at least try to do something about their problems. Radfems just get fat and post on Twitter.
>>85628728What even is a radical feminist could you explain I'm not familiar with the term
>>85628734they want to completely destroy patriarchyhow they're going to do this is a point of much discussion and little action
>>85628728Feminism brought back natural selection to heal humanity from thousands of years of dysgenics.
>>85628755Killing all ugly excess men would be a good start. Its just natural selection after all
>>85628755Do they just want to destroy patriarchy or do they want to replace it with matriarchy
>>85628759that just means that conservative women are going to have more children and make society more conservative
>>85628766matriarchy. Unlike patriarchy, the Matriarchy is the fair and just rule of women. War and crimes only exist because moids are allowed to take decisions when they should just shut up and work.
>>85628773Except conservative women are also enforcing natural selection now. It's not ideological.
>>85628773Not if we kill all male children and raise the few remaining scrotes not be sexist rape apologists?
>>85628765but how are you going to do this
>>85628788it's easy, you can just tell other males to do it
>>85628781what do you think "natural selection" means lol
>>85628788Natural selection mainly. Incels are already getting killed off so its only a matter of time. Maybe speeding off the process a bit by sending 50% of men to die in war would be a good initiative
>>85628794It means the culling of excess males (80% of the total scrote population).
>>85628794Respecting female choice which is attuned to nature.
>>85628765>>85628787>>85628795>>85628798See this is the problem that radfems always run intoIt's easy to say "just kill men" but then none of them actually do it
>>85628734Look up Valerie Solanas and you'll see the true nature of women.
Reminder that kikes are the reason you're a virgin incel. React accordingly
>>85628810bizarre outburst>IT'S DA JOOOOZ
>>85628808She did nothing wrong though.>>85628807Natiral selection just happens on its own. Women are the arbiters of nature as they are directly connected to the divine feminine
>>85628810Enormous trukie. Jews made women do it. Women would never do any of this crap.
>>85628820aren't low iq people more likely to have children than high iq people tho
>>85628832That was only during the patriarchy. Now only the best males get to breed.
Women shouldn't be trialed. Any crime committed by a Woman is an immediate consequence of the patriarchy. Men should be the ones trialed if a woman breaks the law.
>>85628837uhh can i get a fact check please!!
>>85628860technology keeps advancing retard so it's obvious that people are getting smarter, stop blaming women for your own failures in life
>>85628728>>85628734Coming from someone who actually understands their ideology. Basically they took Marxist class analysis and crudely pasted it onto gender relations without making many changes other than in name. (It should only take you five seconds of thought to understand why this is a little bit retarded.) They believe gender roles (analogue for class, and in fact they sometimes call it your "sex class") are imposed by the patriarchy (analogue for capitalism). And the radical part comes from them believing we just need radical cultural change to overthrow that sex-class system.Two of the biggest tells for someone being a crypto-radfem are using the term sex class or quoting Dworkin, but they were also influenced by Shulamith Firestone for example. If you read Firestone's book you'll see her directly saying all of this about how she was influenced by Marxism, before she gets into defending incest for no reason.Speaking of which OP forgot to include the quote where Dworkin's defending incest.
>Radfems just get fat and post on Twitter.yet according to hardworking incels they are winning comfortably?
>>85628877Yes, in large part because influential journalists are largely fatasses whose job is halfway just to post on Xitter and to report Shitter posts as if it was news. They even get to AI generate their articles with ChatGPT these days.
>>85628885And they are beating the patriarchy easily. Are moids this incompetent? No wonder they cannot be trusted with building civilization or created a fair and peaceful society
>>85628906The only thing you're beating is the total fertility rate.
>>85628877radfems and incels are two sides of the same coin
>>85628873This was a very interesting reply and I would like to give a proper reply back and I likely will once I'm more caffeinated but as well as the one guy who said to look up that one lady I will ask him questions about what he thinks about her intentions I don't know the full story but I'm going to look into it it's interesting
>>85628759women have more rights than they have ever had in human history and they are the most miserable and combative they have ever been. why shouldnt we just treat them like the Taliban do? what would be the downside for us?if enough men decided to do this they literally could not stop usnothing makes these harpies happy, nothing.
>>85628873Is there any part of it you agree with or you would agree with if it was slightly tweaked
>>85629059>they are the most miserableaccording to manosphere content creators
>>85628788They aren't lol. They'll just mumble something about natural selection while epically owning themselves out of the gene pool. Don't ask them how many kids they've had though. They don't like it when you do that.
>>85629125I'm a weird guy who's more of a naysayer so I don't want to proclaim positively what should be instead. I could comment "Marxist feminism" also exists which more directly tries to argue capitalism affects women negatively. I also suddenly realized from seeing the "radical feminists" replying in this thread that they straight up haven't read the foundational texts for the ideology they're claiming so my explanation was maybe a little bit pointless. Even if they're quoting Dworkin a lot of them don't like actually read her or anything these days the way they might have back when I learned these things. In terms of the internet posters a lot of them are just Team Women and they think being "radical Team Women" sounds good.
>>85629145according to antidepressant sales
>>85629145google it. plenty of studies showing they are the unhappiest they have ever been
>>85629253What the hell did she say about incest by the way she seems to have some really odd and unethical deviances when it comes to her opinions about human sexuality just from what I read from your text and picture relatedAlso what caused her to have those opinions
all of these jew hags just regurgitated Wilhelm Reich. They're tools of the socially dominant male intellectuals, who want "free love" and kid diddling. Feminism is a shell for other movements, women are indolent.
>>85628728>Even radical incels at least try to do something about their problems.stopped reading
>>85629344She denounced it later. My understanding was this was how you trolled for attention back then or maybe she really believed it I have no idea.
>>85629448there is no radfem equivalent to someone like marc lepine
>>85628822>>85628817Feminism is literally Jewish you retards
>>85628734Feminism in general consists of adopting two axiomatic beliefs:1. The society is a patriarchy.2. That patriarchy should be abolished.The different strains of feminism disagree with how the patriarchy should be abolished. Radical feminism spawned as an opposition to liberal feminism. Liberal feminism states that the patriarchy can and should be abolished through liberal policies and social practices, meaning ones that respect liberal values. Radical feminism rejects that and instead posits that liberal policies cannot abolish the patriarchy, which is why it should also be pursued through illiberal means. In practice this means giving women greater rights than men have, legally discriminating against men, discriminating against men in societal institutions and privileging women, keeping and demanding social practices that favor women at the expense of men like chivalry.
>>85629569There was that one radical feminist mass shooter who was a big fan of rad fem hitler.
>>85629472Her views do seem quite comically outlandish so I understand why you would form that perspective I think it's quite accurate so I agreeWith that said there is a strong chance it isn't or it is but a mix of her own actual perspectives Either way it doesn't change how deranged it is to either do that for attention or to not do it for attentionMaybe she did it for attention to bring attention to her cause
>>85629705So basically they think a system built from patriarchy Which is liberalism Can't abolish patriarchy because it was built from patriarchy itself It makes sense I see why they would think that but why go full female supremacy mode Why not create an alternative one that actually promotes equality while promoting the destruction of the patriarchal systems Why would they want to focus on what you seem to describe as female supremacy and male submission
>>85629784It doesn't. There's no reason why a system built using certain means can't be changed using those same means. It might sound like a nice phrase, but it's retarded if you give it 5 seconds of thought. But I reject the axiom that the society is a patriarchy. There's no actionable consensus on what the term means which makes the goal to abolish it likely to cause a lot of suffering and resentment. Why do you even need a grand narrative to solve issues that you feel disproportionately affect women. Just deal with those issues as those issues instead of trying to construct some cooky story to go along with your activism.
>>85629761She straight up mentioned in one of the early promotional materials for the book that she defends bestiality in the book. It seemed a little too in your face to me so I think it was mainly to drive sales.
>>85629838Part of me doesn't want to bump this thread because both of your last replies were very well thought out but the catalog has currently gone to crap and this captivated my interestLet me ask you this What rights should females have and what rights should males not have for the benefit of both of them
>>85629899>keep an animal in captivity from birth>living in basically hellish torture dungeon conditions the entire time>then slaughter it in mechanical act of absolute brutality>carve up its body into portions, to be shipped all around the country if not the world separately>they are all eaten by different peopleThis is morally okay.>have one animal that lives a good, healthy life on your property>not abused, dies of old age eventually>fuck it occasionallyThis is the most despicably immoral act this side of mustard gassing an elementary school.
>>85631802But maybe we shouldn't be fucking animals or torturing animals she could have just said hey why not have animals be raised in a good environment why did she have to add the sex part in
>>85628807women are borderline none actors throughout history. they admit to it as much. they are incapable of violence or truly willing a change in society that involves them getting their hands dirty or carrying a high level of risk. that's why all their violence tends to be directed to the unborn or as they claim 'clusters of cells'. if you look throughout history the idea of a woman causing change through violence is very rare and generally shows an exception proving the rule more than anything. the funny thing about their kill all men retoric is that it would probably be done by other men
>>85628766It's all wishful thinking because women won't and can't do it.
>>85628759>natural selectionYou dont have kids, the natural selection is you kek
>>85631942Children can be conceived artificially without the need gor scrotes. Go die in wars.
>>85628734It's what millennial whores with no discernible qualities or unique value call themselves to feel radical/x-treme when really they're kind of dull nothing creatures without a rebellious bone in their body, the only rebellion they know is passive spite but they read a Wikipedia article once when they were 16 on an Adderall binge and now fancy themselves an activist, they make for a fine slampig in a pinch
