The averag woman sees the average man as 2/10, and doesn't see anyone higher than 8/10
That makes sense. Like in all other aspects, visually men are shit.We're not talking that they don't use makeup or think tracksuit and sneakers are fashion, a lot of them just fail at the most basic hygiene.
>>85711727so theoretically the trannies should be surrounded by girls right now
>>85711700and this is why you dont give a fuck about their opinions
>>85711700>doesn't see anyone higher than 8/10Interesting. Now let's see what happens when we ask women to rate other women.
>>85711700Women are retarded. Men are actually being pragmatic in their rating of women, and women are being unrealistic. How can 80 percent of men be below 50 percent? It literally makes no sense. They are either being disingenuous or are most likely delusional.
>>85711700um. ya. women are more attractive and put a greater amount of effort into their looks. also, men literally do not need to be attractive.
It's been like this forever and it wasn't a problem before. Naturally, women shouldn't be caring about how men look anyway. It used to be common knowledge that women care about what men provide and men care about women being pretty and making life easier. The way men and women think hasn't changed since then, women are just treated like men now and are taught that men and women should be equal in society and relationships. It's not that women aren't attracted to men, but attraction is fundamentally different and much more emotional for them.
>>85712365>They are either being disingenuous or are most likely delusionalOr they are homosexual and aren't physically attracted to men.>>85712438>It used to be common knowledge that women care about what men provideThe problem with that tradcon talking point is that it means women don't need men anymore. Okay, so you're a provider slave. Great, the government can do that along with provide safety and security. Plus, she can just divorce you and get alimony that way. Reducing men to slaves sets them up to be obsolete and easily replaceable, not to mention strips any love or genuine attraction a woman might have for a man. This is why conservatives are so stupid.
>>85712369That's gay as fuck. Makeup doesn't make you attractive. Most men, at least myself, don't find dolled up women necessarily more attractive. It's too feminine and gay for my taste. Physical attraction should only count how you look like naturally.
>>85712574>The problem with that tradcon talking point is that it means women don't need men anymoreIt's kinda true thoughbeit, but women do sometimes like a man around to supplement their own income. That's about it though. If she wants sex, she can hookup with chad.
>>85712587i never mentioned makeup. there are a plethora of ways one can put effort into their looks... and yes we know most men are fags who don't appreciate cuteness. dolled up women are superior beings....
>>85711700good because I'm a 2 anyway
>>85711700Probably because they're judging them on their grooming style rather than physical attractiveness>>85711727>t. landwhale>>85712438>but attraction is fundamentally different and much more emotional for them.Just say that they're more shallow on average, that's the actual truth behind the feminist propaganda line. They're just far more determined to hide it and think better of themselves
>>85712587Every man says that, every man utterly fails at recognizing what no makeup looks like. They still believe le instagram look is achieved naturally with genetics or surgery, men are retarded.
>>85712574You're right they don't. I don't agree with legal marriage for this reason. I'm not saying it's a problem you can fix, I'm just saying that's how they are. And that type of dynamic doesn't hinder love or attraction from women, that's part of it. If you get a good one she will be grateful and feel secure with you. How is a man in a 50/50 relationship with a women any less obsolete and easily replaceable? Women can get that anywhere extremely easily and when women feel equal they don't respect you. >>85712783They are more shallow on average. That's not a contradiction to what I said.
>>85711700Damn, it must be true because the chart said so
>>85713619i dont mind celery because i need to lose weight
