>man and woman go out on date and get wasted>have sex>woman later claims rape because she couldn't consent in her drunken stateI don't understand how the woman isn't also guilty of rape in this case since the man also couldn't properly consent to sex. Can someone explain?
Moids' default state is consent no matter what
>>85716721It's because of gynocentrism. It's of course illiberal, as it violates men's right to equal treatment, but it's one of the core pillars of the progressive ideology.
>>85716721Simple, because women can't rape men. Men are the penetrative partner in sex.
>>85716721women are on average physically weaker, so equivalently drunk guy would get to do what he wants, drunk woman can't really do what she wants against his wishboth should get reparations from govt for running a country without banning alcohol yet
Legally men aren't considered people. Notice how any time they talk about rights it's women's rights. This is intentional as it excludes men. They aren't saying human rights, or even citizen's rights. Only women.If you say the word men's rights they get very angry. The notion of men having any rights is offensive to society.
>>85716721Because rape laws are for protecting women and society protects women from consequences unless her actions are extra heinous.
All men are rapist killer monstersAll women are child victims with no agencyThis is how normies see the world
>>85716721i didn't want to have sex with him. i gave him a lot of reasons we shouldnt because i knew he wouldn't take my no seriously and he still made me have sex with him. he didn't even use a condom. i was really drunk and my friends left me alone with himidk who im more disappointed in my friends or him
