>most conservative western nation>birthrates of JapanHow do they do it?
Why the indonesia hate?
This article explains why fertility rates are the way they are.https://akarlin.com/where-do-babies-come-from/> "Conservatism" is often cited - but Poland, which has Europe's most draconian laws against abortion, also had Europe's lowest fertility rate for a large chunk of the early 2010s. Extremely atheist Czechia, which has Europe's highest number of porn stars per capita, does significantly better. In fairness, Ireland and far west Ukraine are very high, by European standards. But so is highly liberal (and irreligious) France, the UK, Iceland (0.0% of whose youth believe God created the world), the UK, and Scandinavia generally. Restrictions on female employment, if anything, seem to be correlated with reduced fertility - see low fertility Italy or Japan, which make life hard for married women, versus Scandinavia, where free childcare, generous parental leave, and high female labor participation coexist with high fertility rates. Birth rates out of wedlock - again, no discernible effect. In Iceland, the extreme case (70%), it was semi-accepted even before modernity. But its population has almost quadrupled in the past century, despite no significant immigration. Only France and Sweden had (marginally) higher TFRs as of 2016, except that in Iceland it's actually the natives doing all the work.
>>85722753the most conservative western nation, the ONLY conservative western nation is ISRAEL
>>85722914>We know the causes of the really big differences between First World societies and Third World societies. That is, the countries with 1-2 children per woman vs. 5-7 children per woman.A super majority of people living in third world nations live in nations with below replacement birthrates.
>>85722753No such a thing, I'm sure young polish women are whoring themselves on instagram, same as women everywhere else.>>85722914Imagine quoting your own blog, what a faggot.
A Polish friend of mine recently impregnated his Pajeeta girlfriend. She looks better than JD Vances wife though and is like a decade younger, still it is a humiliation ritual
>>85722753>doing just fineBut jewish corporate line not go up so theyre GOING to collapse in 5 minutes if they dont important infinite africans right now
>>85723986Well so is Japan and South Korea. Demographic collapse takes time.
>>85724009Jewish corporation lines are going up in japan and korea though so they dont have to import infinite africans in 5 minutes, they have to do it in 30 minutes instead
>>85724012Are we really pretending the population can halve every generation and that's feasible long-term?
>>85723986>birthrates of Japan>Do just fine Japanese birthrates aren't good at all
>>85724013Without ridiculous social security and increasingly lower retirement ages I don't see why not.
>>85722914>versus Scandinavia, where free childcare, generous parental leave, and high female labor participation coexist with high fertility rates.Not true, their birth rates are also at record low levels.
how dont they do it, you mean. fix the post
>>85724013Are we really pretending infinity arabs and jeets will contribute to Japan in any way beyond skyrocketing violent crime?
What's funny, Poland's standard of living is set to overtake the UK. Damn. Diversity was sure your strength.
Polish men get to go out at night and they don't have to see white girls talking to niggers and arabas. Imagine.
>>85724024You mean increase the retirement age, right?>>85724034That's a false dichotomy.
>>85724048Why do you long to see everything beautiful in this world completely destroyed? Post hand and nose in a catbox, absolutely no way you're white.
>>85724013If you dont just let the chips fall where they may and hope for the best, yeah
>>85724056Do you actually have an argument? I hate most aspects of America.
>>85724061So what is the solution? I mean I hope robots/AI will solve the strain from a massive older population without many young workers, but that's still a distant dream at this point. More realistically, you'll just work till you die and the median standard of living will decrease over time.
>>85722753I'm sure there are actual thrust worthy scientific studies trying to work it outBut if you want my uninformed Polish opinion, getting a job and a place to live is tough as is and there's no point in having kids when you can barely take care of yourself and on top of that (in my opinion) there's a general feeling that things will only get worse
>>85724048No I meant without ridiculously low retirement ages, IE retirement age goes up. Most people in the past didn't get to retire, and I'd rather do away with the concept than have my entire country ethnically and demographically replaced. Most jobs nowadays aren't even labor intensive in any way, there's no reason a man in his 60s or 70s can't just tip tap away on his computer for 8 hours a day like the rest of us
>>85724117That's extremely bullish given the direction we're heading with AI. Low-skill office work has almost all been given to the third world/AI and high-skill white collar work is already declining due to AI. Most people aren't competent enough for these high-skill jobs to begin with. With all the old people, you still need a huge number of caretakers, and obviously young people who can do the hard labor of upholding infrastructure.
>>85724047plenty of sluts for bbc in poland unironically
