[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


🎉 Happy Birthday 4chan! 🎉


[Advertise on 4chan]


>be me, 29 yo fembot who only ever had sex with 3 guys (2 bfs 1 hookup), and anonymously sexted with gooners a bunch because i get horny sometimes
>REEEE NOT PURE ENOUGH! YOU ARE SUCH A WHORE! YOU CAN'T PAIRBOND! YOU WILL NEVER GET MARRIED! NO MAN WOULD EVER ACCEPT A ROASTIE
>moids here post pornstars who literally took 50000 dicks
>all the other moids in the replies are like "OMG WHAT A GODDESS I'M IN LOVE I WOULD WIFE HER ASAP WOW I WOULD DIE TO WORSHIP HER FEET"
what causes this double standard? why do you worship prostitutes but i as a normal woman get judged for having a normal sex drive?
>>
>>85729913
Read up on the goomba fallacy.
>>
I don't even feel like wasting time to write out logical explanations to threads like these because the femanons either ignore it because it doesn't fit their narrative or because they don't understand it or they just respond with emotionally charged shit instead of seriously engaging because they don't have enough logic, reasoning, or critical thinking ability.
>>
>>85729913
It's because you are judging men as a group on something that differs from man to man. Why do you care about what people that don't care about you think?
>>
File: 1745917321353345.jpg (100 KB, 477x510)
100 KB JPG
>>85729913
I have a bodycount of 1, my max for a future gf is 10 but at the old age of 26 that's starting to seem like a impossible standard.
>>
>>85729913
As a 30 year old myself I would happily marry someone like you, but guys like me aren't the ones you want in the first place.
>>
>>85729913
First, YWNBARW
Second, those are comprised of two different demographics. The ones judging you are also judging OF broads, and those simping for OF broads don't have time to simp for you lole.
Third, that one hookup you had says a lot about you and your view on commitment.
>>
>>85729920
fpbp. simple shit. i personally don't care. but that's partially because i have no interest in a romantic relationship and would rather fuck only.
>>
>>85729913
What the hell are you talking about bitch

There are billions of cucks that don't care about the past of the women they date
>>
>>85729942
>As a 30 year old myself I would happily marry someone like you, but guys like me aren't the ones you want in the first place.
they'd let you manage their OF while they banged the talent llel
>>
>>85729920
no it's the same people, moids on 4chan
>>85729943
what does having had one hookup say about my commitment huh? i was single, horny, i had sex with someone and i moved on. it happens all the time and it's honestly really not that deep. you are really not morally superior to me just because you can't get laid while i can. it's not like i am doing something harmful. you virgins think just because someone had casual sex once, they are literally the same as those who had a hookup 1000 times when it's very much a spectrum. very black and white thinking
>>
>>85729941
i have a body count of 1 too but having exactly 1 seems kinda rare. ideally my bf would be the same. based on the internet virgin men seem prone to cheating on their gf because they get a masculinity crisis realizing if they can get 1 they can get more as well and aren't willing to settle for 1.
>>
>>85729995
That doesn't sound so bad. I'd be comfortable with her fucking other men as long as she wasn't hiding it from me.
>>
>>85729996
You basically spread your legs to a guy you barely knew, hookups are the trashiest behavior a femoid can engage on, it doesn't matter if it was just once
>>
>>85729913
What double standard? I judge the camwhores more harshly. Especially when the market is oversaturated and performers aren't even making money anymore.
>>
>>85729996
>just because you can't get laid while i can. it's not like i am doing something harmful. you virgins think just because someone had casual sex once, they are literally the same as those who had a hookup 1000 times when it's very much a spectrum
I can easily get laid. I just have no interest in sharing the intimacy of my body with a trashy whore. That is the difference between us. I'm probably everything you dream of (rich, successful, very attractive, proactive and tenacious, in the peak of my life) but I wouldn't give you any of my limited time. By hooking up you already proved you don't value yourself at all, you're a nasty and trashy normgroid who believes their body, the body meant to birth and nurture my children, has no value other than awkward, shitty short lived pleasure marred with long term consequences. And fair enough. That's probably the only valid assessment you've made of yourself. In a way it's a moment of clarity that shows to us all what you really are, so thank you for being uncharacteristically honest for a foid.
Me? I'll just keep hitting on girls 18-20 I find attractive on a deeper level and hope they value themselves and our relationship. I've been through 4 relationships these past two years and while half of them were virgins none of them were good enough. The pump and dump will continue, I suppose.
>>
You retards deserve eachother.
>>
>>85729913
idk im a khhv woman and all men have done so far is punish me for it by lusting after other women. theres no point in appealing to men or caring what they think, deep down they want to at least try someone else whos the complete opposite of you anyway
>>
>>85729996
>you are really not morally superior to me
Never claimed I was morally superior to you. What you give to the world is what you roughly take in return. You exhibited low inhibition, and now you're receiving the appropriate treatment from men with low inhibition. Everyone says "You are what you eat", but in my country we say "Show me your friends and I will tell you who you are".
Alas, your own conscience is tormenting you for your past actions, but instead of learning from it you chose to bitterly call everyone that points out your own hypocrisy a virgin in the derogatory sense. FYI I am not a virgin, yet if I knew better I would've kept my virginity. I don't get bitterly jealous of the fact that a few men get the majority of women, because that's not a life that would be beneficial to one's soul. Even considering the fact that (according to your worldview) I should be bitter because women chose someone who takes advantage of them instead of me who would give more than the bare minimum. And I'm not talking about simps vs regular guys who wouldn't bat an eye for a OF 304, I'm talking about the majority of women that act differently around the top 20 percentile man vs the average Joe.
Why are you willingly allowing poison to seep into your heart despite having the upper hand in mate selection? You are drowning in a teaspoon of water. The problems you're facing come strictly from your inner world. Repent, and return to Christ.
>>
>>85730086
But could it perhaps be more punishing to be overtly lusted over? One could say that not being overtly lusted over by men would in fact be conducive to being seen as three-dimensional person, and not just a flat object of sexual desire. What are your thought on that?
>>
>>85730006
without seething like a chud explain what is wrong with that? like who did i hurt by doing that?
>>85730071
4 bodies? you are objectively more degenerate than me yet you have the audacity to judge. you are not morally superior to any hookup havers lmao
>>85730086
100% when i was a khhv woman i thought moids would reward me for it but then i found out they actually simp for the sluttiest women. don't look at what they say just what they do
>>85730119
missionary alert
>>
>>85730169
>like who did i hurt by doing that

Directly nobody, though we could discuss the ramifications that sort of behavior has in society.

But anyway, my point wasn't that you hurt somebody, but that you're a trashy whore.
>>
>>85730169
>you are not morally superior to any hookup havers lmao
You fuck strangers for short term pleasure. I fuck women I get to know intimately as an act of love. You're a disgusting, trashy slut and I am glad you will be continually pumped and dumped by emotionally unavailable men until you hit the wall and die alone.
>>
>>85729996
>no it's the same people, moids on 4chan
I think you should reread the definition of the goomba fallacy.
>>
>>85729913
The former is their true opinion, the latter is what they say when they want to fuck you

Pretty simple
>>
>>85730169
>missionary alert
Keep coping and seething then. While you're at it, make an OF and post your tits here as a beta test (pun intended). See how this turns out and if everyone here will start simping for you. And no, complimenting your tits is not considered simping. The prison you're in is of your own making. If you see that others are getting something that you want, act like them to get it. The law of attraction and all that jazz.
Ps don't start an OF and don't post your tits here, that was a rhetorical statement.
>>
>>85729913
>be me, 29 yo fembot
post tits or your holes or get the fuck out of here nigga this aint your twitter shit diary
>>
>>85730205
no i'm not. whore doesn't mean any woman who has sex. you simp for real whores anyway like every moid
>>85730207
i could just go on any dating app right now and get 100 matches instantly. i could suck a million dicks if i wanted and it would still be easier for me to find love at any time i want than you because i'm a woman. women in any situation will have more suitors than men period. you know that and that's why you are seething and coping
>>
>>85730235
>whore doesn't mean any woman who has sex
Yes, it does. Any woman with more than one body count
>women in any situation will have more suitors than men period
Of course, women to men are like meat to dogs. Just because they eat you it doesn't mean anything
>>
>>85730235
I am so glad ugly, dumb women think like this. They filter themselves out of a good life like the dumb nasty hoes they truly are.
Attractive men with resources have far better chances than mid foids at having successful, long term relationships with unbroken pair bonding and real intimacy. Multiple ones. And they don't need to sleep around to validate themselves. I'm sorry you're so ugly your best argument against this fact is
>weeelll i can get pumped and dumped by thousands of mid desperate men and still settle for an ugly, poor simp i find disgusting and will cuck with chad's son after desperately trapping him into a one night stand teehee
lol foids amirite
You do get what you deserve.
>>
>>85729913
Do you want the the real answer?
A body count of 3 at 29 isn't worth the histrionics (although the hookup is questionable). That is presumably 2 LTRs that didn't work out for whatever reason, expected if you are a single foid at 29.
The problem is the needle gets moved constantly, so constant reinforcement of purity and shaming of sluts is necessary to prevent things like, oh I don't know, 8 participant drug fueled gangbangs on college campuses.
And anyone saying they would marry a pornstar is brown. Or a cuck. Or both.
>>
>>85729913
what kinda guy are you looking for now



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.