This is the important point to keep in mind about hypergamy: it DOES exist in the pre-marital sex market. But it DOES NOT exist (on average) for marriage. Chads may fuck around with lower status sluts, but they will generally NOT marry them.It's important for low status women especially to realize this. For women, you aren't going to tie down that higher status men by fucking him. He'll use you for sex and then discard you for a high status wife when your beauty fades.Check out the research of brilliant economic historian Gregory Clark.
>>85733927Men are hypergamous in marriage though
>>85733940They aren't, on average. Clark's research found that males and females "married up" at similar rates. People marry others of similar status, and when they aren't similar, it's about equally likely that man rather than the female is marrying up.
>>85733927The part of the word "gamy" literally refers to a marriage. If you're not talking about marriage, come up with a different fucking phrase. >but all women are actually men if you think about it>but actually uhhh marriage is also when you kiss someone when you are 10 years old, so that counts as child marriageI hate leftists/marxists, bros. Also if you think there was ever a man who didn't understand that you fuck a bunch of beautiful women because they are attractive, go outside.
>>85734309Our Christian Anglo-Saxon civilization became great and conquered the earth while placing great restrictions on the sexual reach of its high status males, compared to other civilizations.
>>85734350Those same restrictions are what caused a nosedive in homeland birth rates and the problem of nobody wanting to work dirty/hard jobs. Hence why they easily get replaced by more competent civilizations. Smart WASPs just went to other countries and had a bunch of sex.
>>85734383ntaNo, what tanked it was women getting educated/access to resources without commitment to men. Chads knocked up married foids all the time. It was so common it became a meme of the boomer era called "the milkman's daughter".
>>85733927Does this matter? There will be millions of single people either way
>>85734383Birthrates are nosediving everywhere, it's a fundamental problem of modernity. It has nothing to do with our monogamous Christian marriage norms. The baby boom after ww2 happened not because we let high status men have more free reign, but because the status of men were elevated across the board due to the importance of the war effort, which led to men being more marriageable, which led to more children.
>>85734404>Chads knocked up married foids all the time. It was so common it became a meme of the boomer era called "the milkman's daughter".In western Europe and America, this is a myth. False paternity rates have been very low, like 1%, for a long time. It's higher in other parts of the world, like in sub-Saharan Africa.
>>85734476>This is a mythI respect your right to be wrong.
>>85734640Ask any combination of LLMs what the false paternity rate was over time in Western Europe.
>>85734682I'd rather play the world's most boring video game than talk to people who think and talk wrong.>Ask any blah blah blahWhy? Why do anything when you're arguing in bad faith?>False paternity rates have been low.Yeah, it wouldn't reach the reports because no family reported the milkman's child, the family would just raise them like their own to prevent the shame of having a home that's known for infidelity.And that's just the beginning of the rampant errors in your discourse.Don't bother replying. I don't discuss things with dishonest leftists/feminists.
