[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: graylien2.jpg (118 KB, 1024x559)
118 KB JPG
The government will inevitably step in to fix the woman problem
Whether that means women will be incentivized to grow babies in a lab to donate to the authorities to raise or simply draconian laws that punish whatever the fuck is going on currently but one thing I see happening is using AI to turn them into the perfect worker drones with the use of AI genetic modification
The new humanity will just be a bunch of slaves
>>
File: IMG_2089.png (173 KB, 1777x817)
173 KB PNG
Natural selection will solve the woman problem by itself.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=b5X18lqyDO0
>>
>>85755600
Hear me out, the moment the government threatens to take away women's ability to have children from women they will start LOVING to have them
>>
>>85755600
>natural selection
that's not enough to fix this mess
Natural selection is like a wild tiger, you don't let it eat you you use every tool at your disposal to kill it or tame it so that it doesn't eat you
Good image though
>>
>>85755600
I know this guy. he's' right
I just think all the women who thought they could escape evolution give up on that fruitless (literally) endeavour eventually
>>
>grow babies in a lab to donate to the authorities to raise
I have always thought it was weird that historically collective raising of children was more common, but pretty much doesn't exist anymore outside of monesteries.

Having children be raised by the governemt, rather than individual families,
seems like it would greatly increase the birthrate.

I think it might also increase the quality of citizen, since a lot of the people having kids rn are really unfit to raise a child. And the government appointed caretakers would presumably be qualified.
>>
>>85755836
Thats retarded. Then why orphans arent perfect citizens? They are nannied by supposedly qualified people. Jesus christ, read brave new world
>>
>>85755896
Because the government doesn't fund it properly in the present
Once it becomes the main mechanism of creating people it will work
>>
>>85755600
The "instinct to procreate" would have been already built in within them from the fact that every single one of their ancestors have procreated before. It won't be any different if only the descendents of women who procreate today are born hundreds of years from now.
Also many of the women who don't have children today do want to have them it's mainly modern inconvenience, or convenience
>>
>>85755923
Has got to be one of the most retarded reasonings I've ever encountered
Like if we're talking about people who really have no insticts or the mentally ill schizoids or whatever other variations that make having kids unlikely those are a fringe portion of the population who are always going to exist in one way or another you don't "breed them out" and are born to people who want to have children
The rest is a conscious decision that humans are also always going to be doing



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.