[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_0927.jpg (200 KB, 1170x409)
200 KB JPG
"Men are the romantic sex."
>>
romance to women just means Chad jizzing on their face instead of a sub-Chad
>>
File: HR.jpg (43 KB, 513x640)
43 KB JPG
he wasn't trying to be romantic, he was warning the new employee that this woman only has her job because she's screwing someone and not to take her stupid presentation and authority too seriously

many such cases if you manage to get a job at some NPC normy corporation
>>
I would explain why you're retarded, but it would make me retarded for thinking you could understand it. I instead only leave this.
>>
>>85838078
Sounds like guys really like jizzing on faces.
>>
>>85838070
The old man was simply paraphrasing Montaigne who wrote that a king on his throne still sits on his ass. Women just aren't capable of deeper thought it seems.
>>
File: jacke.jpg (94 KB, 1080x1244)
94 KB JPG
romance is dead
i thought /r9k/ was supposed to know this better than anyone
fuck your feelings, fuck your heart.
>>
>>85838078
men are not romantic at all.
>>
>>85838196
>deeper thought
>"she has sex lol"
based honestly. men are probably the dumbest creatures on earth.
>>
>>85838299
you are acting so insufferably vapid that i almost want to think you're a foid
>>
>>85838299
as expected, you stay on the surface of it
incapable of deeper thought
>>
>>85838292
the only reason men see (saw) women as anything more than stinking shitting soulless retards called is because they are romantic
>>
>>85838070
Yeah sex has been cultually accepted to be dominating and humiliating. Chuddies are right that men are the romantic gender in terms of them being classically romantic (courting someone), but as soon as they sleep with said someone they can't respect her. I am not even talking about the hormonal issue (women attach after sex and men detach). Their objective view of that woman decreases not just personal interest
>>
>>85838070
burger is the tasty beef
>>
>>85838313
>as soon as they sleep with said someone they can't respect her
...and they shouldn't, unless it's their wife who they just tried to get pregnant. This is a failing of both men and women.
>>
>>85838313
yeah, and female sexuality is to be attracted to the highest quality male you can possibly believe yourself to have a chance with so they stretch the quality of man they think is possible by "allowing themselves" to be treated poorly and denigrated. men want what they want and women want the best they can get. unless you pair bond immediately and lock each other down the woman will think she can do better and the man will get turned on by a fresh pair of tits. this is humanity.
>>
File: IMG_7317.jpg (21 KB, 460x455)
21 KB JPG
>>85838070
Imagine a scenario where she hears it and her eyes turn red and she whips around and starts levitating and says
> I USE THE STRAP
>>
>>85838334
So it means that generally when women have sex they admire the man they picked. Considering that absolute majority of men had sex, women can admire a wide variety of men. It doesn't make the case look better for males considering that they also mentally discard high value women after having sex and it's the ultimate cope. Yeah she's hotter than me and moved on but hey I bent her over once..
>>
>>85838361
>she's hotter than me and moved on but hey I bent her over once..
not a single intelligent man thinks this or like this. this unprecented level of self-absorption is leagues above Trump, which means, that this bullshit can only ever be attributed to a whamen or some mentally ill mongoloid like a troonaloon.
>>
>>85838196
True. But when old boomers say this it usually comes from jealousy. They talk mad shit about anyone young that moves up.
>>
>>85838369
You really have never heard men say it? Now even once? How they see sex as conquest and the humiliation of the woman?
>>
>>85838372
nope. these are your female fantasies.
>>
File: yex284xn84hd1.jpg (35 KB, 614x540)
35 KB JPG
when will moid-foids understand that we exists because of evolution and genders went through different selective pressures, sex/babymaking/relationship is one domain where incentive is expected to be maximally different

there's no real compatibility outside of larps, what one finds romantic is not for others
>>
>>85838374
Sure. I don't want to argue with a disingenious retard
>>
>>85838371
They like humble bragging about how young people wont be able to retire too cuz the government keeps pushing the retirement age up. Nigga I dont want a shitty 2K a month anyway good luck stretching that out in whatever third world shithole youre forced into. And then the retirement home when they cant wipe their own ass.
>>
File: 4123123.png (441 KB, 690x832)
441 KB PNG
>chad does a thing
>incels, why are men like this?
>>
>>85838378
I'm not reading smut about 10 foot monsters with 15 inch penises who degrade, humilitate, and conquer. These are all female fantasies.
When men think of domination, they want to dominate the world, the other men, the nature, the universe. Not some random ass foid, who doesn't matter.
>>
>>85838391
>When men think of domination, they want to dominate the world, the other men, the nature, the universe. Not some random ass foid, who doesn't matter
women also want to be not cared about tho. the happiest woman has a man who's at work all day while she has babies at home
>>
>>85838397
it doesn't matter what makes women happy. A female's only purpose is to give birth. (for now) Everything else men do better and without foids.
>>
>>85838391
The word domination just means being above someone on whatever hierarchy, we aren't playing association here. You routinely try to be more dominant than someone by insulting them,for example it's a part of life. Unfortunately to man penetration is akin to insult so there is path to healthy romance past the courtship phase
>>
>>85838407
*no path
>>
>>85838402
like it or not, men and women need each other.
>>
>>85838402
There are tons of people that do something better than someone else. The secret of social engineering is to control already exisiting population (there is no way you could get rid of millions of 0 people without consequences) and already existing relationships and traditions. No government program will compare to people authentically wanting to have children and considering we still aren't shitting out 10s of them,their social engineering machine isn't as powerful so it all goes down to traditions again
>>
>>85838407
are you operating under a false assumption, a lie, that males and females are the same? because they aren't. dominating a foid is never a question, because nature took care of that. Bragging to men about the domination of a foid is bragging to your friends about dominating a pet. Nobody takes kindly to the blatant abuse of a pet. You took the responsibility for it and the obligation to take care of it willingly.
>>85838422
this is not true. and it becomes even less true over time, as the technology and science make progress.
>>
>>85838311
men have never been romantic though.
>>
>>85838070
This obviously never happened, and you should fuck off and never come back.
>>
File: 1786420398097181.jpg (65 KB, 1440x1241)
65 KB JPG
>>85838078
True 50 years ago, now it's a 20 foot tall vampire raping them into a coma.
>>
File: images (37).jpg (42 KB, 540x540)
42 KB JPG
>>85838447
That's why men routinely leak photos? That's why all the rap songs involve lyrics about fucking (humiliating) some random female, especially if it's their ex or a woman they are in a conflict with? Sure anon
>>
File: IMG_7285.gif (2.23 MB, 370x428)
2.23 MB GIF
>>85838397
> When men think of domination, they want to dominate the world, the other men, the nature, the universe.
These days, faggots can barely handle a minimum wage job lool. In reality, back in the old times, men didnt have power fantasies like this. The things they did were in service to others (their families, their community). Nobody has that anymore so men have power fantasies to keep them pacified. Thats why on twitter you will find men making photo collages (much like women on Pinterest boards putting together cottage core mood boards) about Ancient Rome and how we must retvrn to nature and be spear chucking like thirdies still are o algo. No thanks
>>
File: cone_cat.jpg (58 KB, 685x900)
58 KB JPG
>>85838070
and then everyone clapped. what the fuck is this post?
>>
>>85838391
Rance, Euphoria, Natsu no Kusari and countless other visual novels disprove this. Or if we're to look at more mainstream pornography there's things like Ghetto Gaggers and Facial Abuse.
I don't understand why men pretend male sexuality is more wholesome than it actually is. Does it net you clout with other men?
>>
>>85838430
>There are tons of people that do something better than someone else.
this is true for now, but also the more intelligent person will figure all the shit they need out by themselves or learning anyway.
>there is no way you could get rid of millions of 0 people without consequences
The ideal imaginary society is subjective and only exists in the head. Reality revolves around circumstance. You could get rid of all of the millions of barbers worlwide today, erase the existence of the profession itself, and my life will not change in any way. In fact, this is exactly what happens by itself now, the barber shops close doors, because there is too much offer and very little demand, esp. from men.
You very premise of humanity being in dire need of as many working hands as possible is false. Humanity is always in the dire need of the very intelligent people, top 10%, let's say. But there is a reason they're just the 10%. Most everything can be and will be automated over time anyway. It is a long time coming logical progression of technology with or without AI. We've been automating everything for decades.
>>
>>85838070
unc dropped a TRVTH NVKE fr fr
>>
File: 65789324234.jpg (216 KB, 1448x1068)
216 KB JPG
I like drinking water, but too much at once
>>
>>85838473
They don't want women to treat them as the competitions they are. Everyone is aware that we have competing interests evolutionary but we also have those socially. They don't want their gf or wife to demostratively cuck them and use any means to humiliate him as many men do in reverse. Technically there are gold diggers who kinda use and discard men but it's so abnormal and non-routine. Your daily life gold digger never embarrasses her man in a conversation with her friends as he does talking about her
>>
>>85838478
Barbers aren't getting genocided lol they just switch to another job. You effectively can't ethnically cleanse any demographic that is economically involved enough in the global trade,for example. In regards to intelligent people, they are needed but their recruitment is so automatized you might aswell never mention it. They are fairly replaceable between each other bowadays
>>
>>85838462
>>85838473
you're talking about trash. none of it is a brag between intelligent adults. Millions of these trash men, who can't even control themselves, have to be and will be removed. genetic modification in the future or otherwise.
>Does it net you clout with other men?
no. these are animals, quite literally. not intelligent and not disciplined enough to overcome very basic animalistic urges. These people do not move the world forward and objectively do not matter.
There is a reason the (sexual) degeneracy is looked down upon in the better societies.
>>
>>85838522
>Barbers aren't getting genocided lol they just switch to another job.
> In regards to intelligent people, they are needed but their recruitment is so automatized you might aswell never mention it.
you miss the forest for the trees.
>>
>>85838493
nta but females are never unsure if the kid is theirs, paternal uncertainty is a male only concern.

you are talking about reputational risk from being known as someone with higher paternity risk(either from rape, or past sexual assault) which activates 1) sperm competition drive in men 2) activates blame shifting drive in men 3) increases intimate partner violence chance to prevent future reduced risk of paternal uncertainty 4) may lead to worse born infant care or infanticide

sperm competition drive
- increased sexual roughness, being more open to sharing their gf. the design of the penis itself is partially to scoop out sperm of other guys

activates blame shifting drive in men
- men want lower mate poaching risk and future chance of additional gf/wife, but that is hurt if he is known to not be able to keep his female without being touched or known to be a cheating risk. he needs to then semi-publicly shift blame on her. in ancestral like cases, she'd also be sent back for some time to her family to "fix" her which also shifts reputational blame on family and any related female kin will also be considered a suspect. sometimes family will kill the female under excuse of spiritual possession or whatever to remove reputational risk

increases intimate partner violence chance to prevent future reduced risk of paternal uncertainty
- the mechanism is similar to what is known from chimpanzees, they beat the shit out of their female as a training to what would happen if the cheat in the future

may lead to worse born infant care or infanticide
- suspected as not their kid, so reason is simple. sometimes the mother will kill the infant to not waste resources on her own too - specially if she thinks she switch mate
>>
>>85838450
And women have? Lmao
>>
>>85838568
*either from cheating risk or past sexual assault
>>
>>85838070

Based boomer giving the college numale a reality check.
>>
File: 1500194167077.png (228 KB, 3000x2100)
228 KB PNG
>>85838070
Farmers were genocided. They used to be 50-70% of the population now it's more like 2-5%
>>
If sex is so degrading why is it bad if a woman never has sex with men?
>>
>>85838969
The way men describe sex makes me want to not have it at all. They always make it sound rapey as possible and then act confused when you're not interested in doing it with them.
>>
>>85838292
>men are not romantic at all.
I wanted to be romantic when I was younger. Now that I'm divorced, I don't care.
>>
>>85838402
If all nurses quit their jobs to be SAHMs the mortality rate would skyrocket
>>
People who post blue checkmark fake stories to other websites should kill themselves.
>>
>>85838450
translation: a billionaire gigachad vampire has never raped me
>>
>>85838372
>You really have never heard men say it? Now even once? How they see sex as conquest and the humiliation of the woman?
Not in my personal life. I've literally only seen that attitude on television. Only chad gets to act like that. The rest of us have to work for it.
>>
>>85838070
Having to do nothing during sex but be serviced by the man doing physical labor is more alpha than he is implying.
>>
>>85839020
That just means some men do act like that and others want to. It's not a denial of it being the predominant attitude of the male sex.
>>
>>85838450
Good. Foids deserve only suffering.
>>
>>85839046
>That just means some men do act like that and others want to. It's not a denial of it being the predominant attitude of the male sex.
No, it means women prefer men with that attitude.
>>
>>85838070
What do you mean by romantic? If you mean men are capable of believing in all the Disney true love bs propaganda we were feed about women and female nature as children you are correct. Why do you think most of the men on here are pissed off at women. It is anger over being lied to about how women really act versus what we were told and are pissed off the fantasy isnt real.
>>
>>85839228
Prefer ones who act on that attitude, maybe. But the hatred of Chad always contains an underlying desire to become him. It's the shared desire of all men.
>>
>>85839305
>Prefer ones who act on that attitude, maybe. But the hatred of Chad always contains an underlying desire to become him. It's the shared desire of all men.
I don't hate Chad. He's just doing what works. It's a shame it works that way, but you're the one buying what he's selling.
>>
>>85838292
>be foid
>have a hookup with the most obvious pump and dumper who screams he will fuck and dump you
>get pumped and dumped
>complain about men not being romantic
>ignore the existence of 1000 other romantic men trying to date you because they arent chad
>>
>>85839330
>I don't hate Chad
Your language choices betray you.
>Only chad gets to act like that
>The rest of us have to work for it

>but you're the one buying what he's selling
Bzzzt. I'm a post-walled virgin. That's why I'm on 4chan.
>>
men are absolutely 1000x the more romantic sex. I know this because I finally cracked and started dating a tranny for the first time recently and she's 1000x more romantic than all of the cis women I've dated in my life combined, it's not even close. call me a fag I don't care, real women are incapable of love
>>
>>85838070

Men are fucking disgusting, i hate them
>>
>>85839355
>Your language choices betray you.
Your hang ups on perceived tone betray your lack of objectivity.
>>but you're the one buying what he's selling
>Bzzzt. I'm a post-walled virgin. That's why I'm on 4chan.
Can't afford it then, lol.
>>
>>85839440
Neither of us are approaching this conversation from an objective angle. You have a philosophy you'd like to convince me of (or at least get the last word in while trying), and I have mine.
>Can't afford it then, lol
My perceived tone senses are going off again. Wrong again, though. I only like 2D.
>>
>>85839005
1. the mortality rate will skyrocket naturally for a while, because the birth rates have dropped and the population is getting much older on average. check the amount of zoomers vs the amount of boomers.
2. caretakers will be needed for a good while, but we're on a track to have AI and robotics help out the medical fields, which will be great, because it will reduce the workload of the professionals massively.
>>
>>85839455
>Neither of us are approaching this conversation from an objective angle. You have a philosophy you'd like to convince me of (or at least get the last word in while trying), and I have mine.
I am. The attitude you describe is objectively not common and when it is present it is rewarded. Ball's in your court. Reward a different attitude and it will go away.
>>Can't afford it then, lol
>My perceived tone senses are going off again. Wrong again, though.
Point still stands whether you personally are on the market or not. The vast majority of women choose to pay.
>I only like 2D.
Lol.
>>
>>85838070
Being romantic is pretty gross. It's pathetic and goalless entitled activity and people treat it like a cheap dophamine factory which it is while insisting there's anything special about it. If people can register how "romantic" of a person you are you are just a massive whore who strives on cheap pleasure
>>
>>85838196
is that it though? not implying >>85838087
>this woman only has her job because she's screwing someone
as spbp said?
>>
>>85838485
The trick here is that when women say their ideal number of sex partners over a period of time is "1" they're not necessarily thinking of the same man, they're thinking of monkey branching
>>
>>85840160
Monkey branching is a male thing
>>
>>85840324
nope, harems and concubines are - men has no good evolutionary reason to lose a chick unless she is cheating, but it was made effectively illegal by other males and recent religions for obvious male-male competition stability reasons.
>>
>>85838070
He's right though. That's why I don't respect any woman no matter what. In private they all suck and fuck dick like submissive whores.
>>
>>85840345
Are you just trolling? Men are constantly monkey branching to the younger girl. They do not give a shit about a woman they already fucked, and unless there are kids dont stick with an aging woman
>>
>>85840324
The foids aren't even trying anymore
>>
>>85840376
They probably dont need to. Their sex drive is much lower and its always a bit dangerous for them to try to find a new partner
>>
>>85840371
>adolescent girls, as compared to boys, are less likely to believe that a romantic partner is required to be truly happy (Scheling & Richter, 2021)
>adult men, as compared to women, are more likely to think that life without a partner is empty and makes one incomplete as a person (Dykstra & Fokkema, 2007)
>Both divorce and nonmarital dissolutions are typically initiated by women, not men (Brinig & Allen, 2000; Kalmijn & Poortman, 2006; Morris, Reiber, & Roman, 2015; Wahring, Neyer, Hoppmann, Ram, & Gerstorf, 2024)
>70% of couples in a [..] study agreed that the male partner said "I love you" first (Ackerman et al., 2011)
>men more so than women tend to hold favorable feelings and attitudes toward their ex-partners (Athenstaedt et al., 2020)
>80% of men, but only approximately 50% of women, viewed their partner as their closest person in a UK study (Liao, McMunn, Mejia, & Brunner, 2018)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X24001365

Look at history, any dude who got any amount of free power, first thing he does is get 10 wives and 300 concubines.

Women with 2 or more male partner creates paternal uncertainty between the males, 0 to infanticide level investment treatment to the kid and increased sexual violence pattern like chimpanzees to increases paternity. One male many female do not have this problem.

In addition:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.09.004 shows operational sex ratio in tribal context is 11.7 male per 1 re-productively available female at any given time for humans. So the cost of getting a new partner is much higher than keeping and continuing paternity, adding is always better for men, literally no reason to switch other than legal or social pressures unless maybe post-menopausal.

If forced to pick only one? yes, younger better. Any other cases, both or more is better. At some point the increased number becomes a problem for increased mate guarding cost or other males killing him to take his, but not at small range.
>>
>>85840440
I looked at history. Men are monkey branching to keep having sex with young women. Your post has nothing to do with my point.
>>
Romance and true mutual love is for the young and high IQ, it's a special magical thing that not everyone gets. Not even close. Of course all you normals and failed normies and bitter nons could never understand it
> expecting romance in some awful office meeting that should've been an email
Dumb normalnigger. If any of you animals knew anything about love, you'd know it's not about men being perfect or women being perfect. No- humanity in general is rotten muck but 1 man and 1 woman can still come together and form momentary respite against that muck
>>
>>85840440
There was polyandry in the Tibet because of resource scarcity. It really depends on the material conditions. And powerful women don't really need to concern themselves with paternity like Ecaterina the 2nd
>>
>>85839934
>The attitude you describe is objectively not common
By what measuring stick? The OP post has 30k likes.
>and when it is present it is rewarded
Sure. I'm not arguing against that point.
>Reward a different attitude and it will go away
I'm not rewarding any attitude because I'm not having sex.
>Lol.
This used to be an anime centered website, you know. Show us old timers some respect.
>>
>>85838070
>there are fully grown adults who still believe the concept of romance in general
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>85838070
Well they fucking do...
>>
soulless miga and american psycho meme avatar, soulless post
>>
>>85838070
This is excellent wisdom from an ojisan.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.