[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: HVnT6z_XUAAZDfz.jpg (104 KB, 667x900)
104 KB JPG
You've lost the war. What punishment would you give the soldiers who fought for you but failed?
>>
>>85841311
If I lost the war then chances are that my head will be the first to roll. We fight to the last man, because death by the enemy's hands is a more merciful fate than what they will subject us to if we surrender and I will make sure that my troops know that.
>>
>>85841311
wars are stupid
>>
>>85841333
When you lose
>>
>WHY DIDN'T YOU KILL THE ARABS SO THE AMERICANS CAN REDUCE OIL BY 5 DOLLARS?
>NOW THE AUTOMOTIVE EXECUTIVES WILL HAVE TO BUY A SLIGHTLY SMALLER FIFTH YACHT
>>
None if I was being boring and pragmatic
>>
>>85841311
Why would I punish my own soldiers if the war is over.
>>
>>85841311
I wouldn't. The defeat was punishing enough.
>>
>>85841311
EmpIoyment
>>
>>85841311
>What punishment would you give the soldiers who fought for you but failed?
none
>>
>>85841311
Make them kill me.
>>
>>85843464
Via firing squad?
>>
>>85843496
Sure, why not. Have 'em all chuck grenades at me for good measure. Douse me with napalm or wooly pete if we had any.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.