Do women ever reflect on the fact that after gaining their freedom, birth rates collapse below replacement rate? This is consistent everywhere. The literal will of women is to extinct the species. How can that be anything but ontologically evil?
>>85841871It was inevitable, despite the freedoms women have earned. There's just too many people
>>85841871Replacememe doesnt make sense because the population still goes higher, not lower. And it has nothing to do with freedom. Do you think sex slaves have a lot of healthy kids lol? Every population cycle in history had to stabilize at some point. Its evil to be childless, its not evil to be below replacememe
>>85841871maybe the replacement rate was set to rape instead of consentc:compare it to consenting rates xdxdxdxdxd
>>85841871>Do women ever reflectYou can stop there. No. Never. Women don't reflect in anything. They just seethe at feeling wronged and make excuses when they do the same to others.
>>85841871Women dont care about their population, their race, their culture, their people. Women care about looking pretty and getting attention.
>>85841871i don't think it makes me evil to think even most first world countries don't need this many people. my small country has 10 million people, when you look at the earth's whole history or even just ancient history up til now this is absolutely insane. the fact that couples in this overpopulated world where you have to compete for even intern jobs like your life depends on it want to only have 0-1 kids does not mean this will continue forever, that is statistical fallacy thinking. once we have a revolution, of any kind, and the population is sufficiently low and not 10 million in even super small countries, life will normalize, couples will feel like their children have a chance to make it again. currently, nobody but the top 1% feels like that.>le brown countriesin them you don't have compete like your life depends on it for the simplest of warehouse jobs. that is the truth in europe however. but seems like the elite isn't interested in changing this, they want to have their army of the unemployed for political reasons. well, this is the end result. they got too greedy, people stopped feeling like their children will have any chance of making it.>t. foid who is having 0-1 children
>>85841975wanting less whites and more browns makes you objectively evil, actually part of why I will never ever give any non-white foid or a lefty white foid any sympathy whatsoever, you're all piece of human shit
>>85841990>didn't read and just posts xer fetishyou troons will never make it.
Caring about the birth rate is the weirdest, chuddiest thing I can imagine.It's always tinted with some casual racism like handwringing over immigrants or something.No, the species isn't in danger. People are still fucking and having kids.People also have the freedom to live life without family obligations.For all the people complaining about birthrates, how many kids have you got?Did you do your part by getting on a dating app or going to church to meet some radtrad, chudette to have a dozen kids with?Did you make the incredible sacrifices and put in the hard yards that comes with your beliefs?Or are you just another half hearted LARPer taking on a radical belief, but then explaining away why you aren't going to actually put in the effort to live out those beliefs?Until we seem them babbies, you will always be a larper.
>>85842026>Or are you just another half hearted LARPer taking on a radical belief, but then explaining away why you aren't going to actually put in the effort to live out those beliefs?ThisThe feminine male epidemic is true
>>85842026>>85842033nothing the OP said was radical and simply displayed some facts, yet you respond emotionallynothing in the OP text is even tinted ideologically "right" (you don't actually know what that means)curious
>>85842048>gets called a larper>immediately starts crying and can't take the heatMan modern "men" are whiny as fuck lmao
>>85842026>Caring about the birth rate is the weirdest, chuddiest thing I can imagine.>It's always tinted with some casual racism like handwringing over immigrants or something.The comfort and euquality women have today, and men as well lets be clear about this here, is due to a very specific culture stemming from a certain group of people. If these people get replaced and outbred, there will be a slide back to an oppressive culture. I am less concerned about race, and more concerned about propagating the post WWII culture meme and maintaining a population with genetics capable of supporting it.I have 3 kids.
>>85841871I've had eight kids, in spite of my freedom. I did my part lol
>>85842072Who is going to replace and outbreed these people when every population on earth across the board has falling birthrates as they get better access to health and family planning resources?How are they going to meaningfully replace when every western country is implementing more and more strict immigration control policies?You are fighting with phantoms. There is no danger of collapse.You can enjoy you family without wringing your hands over people who choose not to have families
>>85842072>propagating the post WWII cultureThat ended after the 70's and will never come back thanks to neoliberalism, but hey at least you're trying.
>>85842066You sure have an interesting definition of "crying" and "larping". Perhaps projection.
>>85842213First the crying and now you're acting defensive, no need to tell me you got offended.
The incel-to-tranny pipeline is real.
>>85841871The only way women retain their current rights is with stable birth-rates. Any other path means they lose their rights.>Political radicalism results in losing rights>Mass-immigration results in demography changing the political landscape against women, particularly against women not of the new ethnicsWomen for the most part subconsciously don't care about their people or nation, it makes no different if it's the men of their own ethnic or another that rules them. They believe that they will be safe and looked after regardless. It's partly why they are so content with immigration. Of course this is wrong, men of other ethnics will abuse the western woman and limit her entirely in ways she can't comprehend. So no, the will of women is not to cause extinction, she will continue the species but she simply doesn't have the foresight to put her cards down with the men that will guarantee her the "freedom" she so desires. It's over for the modern woman, as a group they've sealed their future.
>>85841871women evolved to exist within boundaries. their nagging and neediness was a strategy to maximize resources. in modern times, women have little to gain but their evoluntionary strategy remains. in fact, if women owned everything and completely disenfranchised men, they would continue to nag into the void endlessly
>>85841871Moids don't deserve to be born, aborting them is God's work
>>85841871Men want children the same way a child wants a puppy. They will convince themselves that despite living a life manicured for their comfort and avoiding routines of social interaction and bonding and exercising their ability to manage other people that they will suddenly acquire all necessary skills to be a good father once the kid is born. That rarely happens, even very well intentioned men rarely make it to a 50/50 split on childrearing regardless of who is the breadwinner. Women are not naive, they've grown up with fathers and male figures who are only such when it's convenient for them. They've watched their mothers, aunts, sisters, friends all get the short end of the stick and came to the same conclusion which is to bow out of the motherhood trap altogether.
