[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Literally what is stopping moids from uniting to destroy the genetically genocidal, civilization eradicating, Feminazi Gynocracy? You've reasonable amount of moid unity, casus belli and shiett. So why not launch an all out revolution against the the matriarchy that has genocided over 1 billion children, has started to selectively genocide moid babies, openly discriminates moids in jobs and what not?
>>
>>85844063
Competitive instinct and inherent lack of in-group bias.
>>
>>85844063
"They" don't want that.
>>
>>85844063
Probably because you would have been aborted then if this started sooner and the world would have been a better place because of that
>>
did a German person write this thread?
>>
>>85844063
Men are basically slaves to women. The difference is that even slaves revolt. Men just take it willingly. They've internalized their slaveness.
>>
>>85844107
nice cope whore. now run back to ur sissy daddy
>>
>>85844063
Because in most cases the man supports or is indifferent toward abortion. In some cases he is the one convincing woman to do it. The cases when they abort and the man is against it are a big minority.
>>
>>85844063
The patriarchy makes it impossible. Feminists have been trying to stop men from oppressing women for generations
>>
>>85844257
There has never been a patriarchy in the world world though, except maybe in Afghanistan
>>
on a global level they're still selectively genociding foid babies, hence male-dominated outmigration and incels
>>
>>85844285
Sure and there has never been poor people either, they just dont exist bro
>>
>>85844063
High status men who hold all the strings are the ones who get all of the foid attention so why would they want to change anything
>>
>>85844063
It will lead to that, and more, if this current set of social trends are not steered away from the interminable conditions they are right now.

You will begin to see young men gradually, and noticeably, become more and more anti-social, even more than they are now, and had been in ages past; and they will begin to demonstrate wilder and wilder sexual interests and coping mechanisms for not being able to breed or even find basic human connection -- interests that will become as destabilising to the wider arch of human civilisation and society as the current Female Sexual Selection Hysteria Crisis; if not more so.

These anti-social men, will not be social recluses: these men will become real, actual, societal terrors.
If the current trends are not substantially and adequately altered to adjust for human social wellness, the droogs from the fiction "A Clockwork Orange" will become a real, everyday reality and violence will be commonplace;
>Men will kill other men, and women, on sight and at random. Women will be much, much, much, much more unsafer and at risk of being rape also.
>Men will seek younger and younger females to breed with as an alternative to the older females selecting the majority of men out. Do you understand what I am saying? These men will organise into bands of roaming raiders and assault parties for this end.
>The social fabric will be torn up: no politeness, kindness, favours, services, extensions of civility, chivalry, decency, pleasantness. Instead, there shall be violence, insults, anger, and unsafe social conditions for women whenever they go outside without the protection of their -- by this point they would have to need armed guards and transport -- chosen Sultan.
>Children will be made to bear a brunt of the violence as well, sadly.
>Men will no longer work, contribute, pay-in to society, or provide services to their respective governments. There will be total collapse.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink
>>
>>85844425
Venezuela solved that problem in less than a year. Also as long as incels have tendies they arent going to go outside.
>>
>>85844438
>It won't happen because right now it's fine
PLEASE GO TO SCHOOL
>>
>>85844444
>2 more weeks until it stops being fine
Calhoun is a fucking retard who literally did not go to school btw. You have your entire meme backwards, its not street crime or incel gang rapes but rather government overreach and wars that are trending
>>
File: 1790482359382745.png (676 KB, 1819x1675)
676 KB PNG
>>85844063
>Literally what is stopping moids from uniting
I illustrated it for you here OP
>>
>>85844473
Chad doesnt get pussy
>>
>>85844425
Best part about this, is that it doesn't need to happen.
It's totally unnecessary. These men aren't suddenly magically dysgenic, faulty men with genetic problems, but women seem to think they are and are treating them like that because of an external societal and cultural issue -- social media, internet, and "dating apps".

All of this social unrest has been, and continues to be, the result of social media, internet, and tech companies using what should be a post-scarcity technology way too early (internet); and knowingly causing unspeakably massive social damage to the fabric of society; the biggest one however has been tanking their species' mating selection norms via digital algorithmic selection that is done from a centralised server, a place from which the illusion of choice given to women is then subjected to the perception-based whims of women; all of whom are on the corporate mannequin string.
These are women who are famous for believing anything, and doing anything, so long as they perceive or have been convinced that it is socially acceptable or the norm. And guess what social media does? It does exactly that.
>>
>>85844481
Is your name Chad and you're speaking in the third-person like Elmo?
>>
>>85844330
Literally when has patriarchy ever existed in the west you dumb whore ? Even our own forefathers were whore rehabbing sissy faggots unlike the inbreds of middle east who're much more into whore patrol
>>
>>85844492
They are dysgenic. Modern medicine keeps them around but they would normally be evolved out of the gene pool. Fortunately they dont have as many kids of they own.
>>
>>85844500
Literally when have poor people existed? When has starvation ever existed you dumb liberal. Even our own forefathers were kings and astronauts
>>
>>85844501
>Dysgenic because of massive unforeseen social and cultural and technological change expressing huge evolutionary bottlenecks onto their species needlessly.

That's not dysgenic
>>
>>85844513
Poor by definition are those at the bottom rungs of the wealth ladder. Even then, poor westerners are still more rich than say a middle class subcontinentaloid
>>
>>85844518
Dysgenic because they are incapable of surviving without medical intervention, they are generally too weak and stupid to be out in the real world, and their hideously deformed features reflect that
>>
>>85844063
Aborting men is not murder so the killcount should be lower than that.
Women should be blackpilled about me already and start reducing the male population before they chimp out
>>
There is no feminazi gynocracy when you turn off the internet
>>
>>85844063
I don't care about abortions. Those are a net positive. You fags that care are morons. At least they kill the thing while it can't even think. Spartans would leave weak and defective new borns to die. Abortions are a mercy. Imagine the mothers and lives they were spared.

I want to destroy the matriarchy because I hate most women. They live with no honor, loyalty, honesty or justice and feel no shame for it. Not because of some christian faggotry about caring about unborn wretches.
>>
>>85844526
Imagine bringing up definitions after outing yourself as a fucking retard who doesnt understand what words mean
>>
>>85844534
Honor and loyalty only exist if you are religious. And it is your duty to lead your wife, not your moms. Retarded fucking schizo
>>
>>85844527
But that's incorrect
>>
>>85844550
What are you even trying to fucking say here,
Civilisation Destroyer?
Are you trying to argue for your personal ego using hypocritical arguments again, Civilisation Destroyer?
Suddenly telling men to lead their non-existent wives... hmm?

Are YOU someone's wife?
We thought you Civilisation Destroyers don't get married anymore.
We though you said that you don't want kids.
We thought you said that you hate kids.
We understand that you hate being a woman and you hate humanity we get it.
Why should the men that don't, let their species be dragged into a millennia of filth for no reason, Civilisation Destroyer?
>>
>>85844537
That's what poor means in a given society, atleast when proxied by wealth, you dumb, useless whore
>>
>>85844063
Chads and to a very lesser extent Brads have been paid off well by the Gynocracy. Chad gets endless young women to fuck who he then casts aside. This is actually useful to the Gynocracy since it creates Chad Widowed seething hags who then become enforcers of the Gynocracy. The Brads are the most chance of revolutionary potential. Although the gynocracy gives them a bit its really far less than they deserve. But chad's leftover 5 seems to keeps them from chimping out mostly.
>>
>>85844063
Faggot simps outnumber dedicated incels 10 to 1 on this board.
>>
>>85844063
The mass of blue pilled men that out number the red pilled/black pilled terminally online ones by an order of magnitude.
>>
>>85844285
The west was basically a patriarchy before womens suffrage.
>>
No one sympathizes with you because you literally post shit like this unprompted. You are danger in the same way a wild dog is.
>>
>>85845245
It never was, even back when they were a marauding band of ooga boogas. Foid worship, foid freedom and foid glazing was quintessential. It's also why Lady Boudica existed in yoogay and not in say Rome.
>Romans are westerners
Only after it got subdued by Barbarians. The Etruscans were their own thing. They were ighly patriarchal(perhaps not afgan tier, but still) & honour driven.
>>
>>85845247
>Unprompted
lmfao you have yet to understand the depth of men's rage you've collectively inspired. I don't think it's even once in a century, I think it's literally the kind of shit women get once a millennia -- it will happen, it can't not at this point barring an apocalypse (one of which woman have begun the process of anyway).

You're a danger the same way a compromised king is a danger to his kingdom
>>
>>85844550
>honor and loyalty only exist if you're religious
There's always someone that can say something that blows out the last most absolutely retarded thing you've heard. Today, it's you.
>>
>>85844063
They don't have uniting anti feminism ideology.
When they have even trillion dollar military can't stop incels, see Afghanistan.
>>
>>85846047
do you even have any idea how many goatfuckers got btfo'd when russians invaded them? lower end estimates indicate atleast 3-5 million got perma btfo'd. If feminists do take charge, the first they'll do is launch a new inavsion of afghanistan and ensure every single moid over there gets exterminated and they won't care how much money gets spent or how many american lives get lost to achieve that. it kind of is the great boogeyman cuz as long as afghanistan exists in it's current patriarchal form, men of other societies will feel tempted to emulate it & never lose hope trying to achieve it.
>>
>>85844063
i think you almost said something valuable there but your degenerate word usage came in the way and i have no idea what you're even talking about, nor do i want to.
next time speak english.
>>
File: humiliation ritual.png (1.02 MB, 1001x921)
1.02 MB PNG
>>85844063
>Literally what is stopping moids from uniting to destroy the genetically genocidal, civilization eradicating, Feminazi Gynocracy?
3-4 generation of deliberate selective cacogenic breeding of males to reduce them to a permanent disposable slave/puppet/enforcer class.

If you even have to ask this question, you're one of those retards who were too occupied talking about hypergamy and other limited hangout manosphere crap that you failed to notice who's actually being selected for future generations. It's not Chad, it's the subservient fat balding subhumans who produce an additional two male slaves and then they're either devoured or discarded, depending on whether they have enough resources to be even worth the effort of getting divorce raped.
Women knew exactly what they were doing, they did this on purpose. They weren't lying when they told you what they're selecting for, they just chose their words very carefully.
>emotional intelligence
>emotional availability
and all these other made up terms translate to one thing: compliance. Being compliant and agreeable means you get to reproduce.

There was this clip of Marco Rubio bragging about how it's basically the most desirable male trait to be obedient to your wife and then you could see his wife getting pricked up and being visibly upset about it. It was legit scary if you're aware of this shit.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.