>lube up>Bend over>Stop complaining You literally vowed to take care of this. Your feelings don't matter.All excuses boil down to "but I don't wanna, but don't you dare cheat on me"
>>85847529men have zero excuses not to buy me anything and everything i want when we're married
>>85847571Where is that in the marriage vows?
>>85847571Height , age and weight please. Ill be the judge of that.
>>85847575you dont need to be, plenty of men that are willing to exactly what i want including my bf
>>85847610>ducking the question
>>85847610>my bf>men should buy me everything and indulge my every whimeither your bf is a loser or hes going to get sick of you
>>85847646loser by your standards, winner by societies standards. i never date losers. men get really happy when they spend their money on you as long as you say "thank you". its what theyre designed for.>>85847622why should i care? im not single but even if i were, youre not rich or a chad, so your judgement or validation of me is worthless. i could be a 10/10 gigastacy or an obese burn victim and id still be on the lookout for a man that serves me
It's a communication issue and what is routine. If you plainly state sex isn't allowed to be denied, le heccin' need, etc. at least a blowie, peepee tuggies, or starfish'd quickie then it's not a big deal. Sometimes you have sex with her, sometimes you masturbate with her body. It takes less than five minutes and you probably don't need it more than three or four times a week. Dead bedrooms happen because not tonight is accepted without resistance. Gradually more advances or denied, intervals between increase, and before long it's a dead bedroom. Probably helps matters if you are the sole earner and don't get fat. I see fat guys who let their wife work and it's just kind of like, even if I was a homo or woman I wouldn't exactly be thrilled at the idea of their penis going in me either. She, can't be a homemaker if she's pouring all her energy into jewish daycare and being sexually satisfied by coworkers and romance novels.
>>85847873I wouldn't retire my wife until her 60s at the soonest. They need a business of their own or something to do. Muh stay at home in the era of social media is a gamble.
>>85847574Where is unlimited sex in the marriage vows?The vow you give is to take care of each other in happiness and misfortune, and having no libido is in fact quite unfortunate illness. So you vowed to still continue caring even if she cant put out.
>>85848027To have and to hold, to honor and obey, these two lines that are bog standard cookie cutter vows strongly imply sex. Then the due benevolence part of the Bible makes it explicit. A wife is not allowed to deny sex. Some people aren't Christian, but I'd argue non-Christians can't get married because it's a religious thing. The legal fiction that for whatever reason is also called marriage is something completely different and entirely unrelated to real marriage.
>>85848145>strongly imply sexThey dont. You are just imagining things. I brought up the whole ordeal with misfortune and how low libido is an illness, to give you a mirror. It's an intentional stretch, but you are also stretching and interpreting it in your favor except unlike me you are clueless about it. There is no actual vow for sex of any kind. Only cultural expectations. >non-Christians can't get married because it's a religious thingMarriage exists in cultures outside of christianity too. I mean like, religious marriage.
>>85848187Sex is required in marriage. A wife is not allowed to refuse. Your headcanon does not override the very foundations of an ancient religion no matter how badly you wish it did. Just don't get married if the thought of being expected to uphold vows made before God is such a problem for you. Christians are like 1-1.5% of Americans at most so it will never be a problem unless you go explicitly looking for one.
>>85847571Did you just admit to being a prostitute?
Honestly the sex thing should be discussed and generally should go both ways. If the husband repeatedly denies the wife for years, he shouldn't be surprised if she eventually may want to leave or ask him for external sex
>>85848222Excuse me, but we were talking about vows. Op claims that there was a vow made to not deny sex. Except that no such vow exists. Everything else you wrote is irrelevant copium. All of those words (to cherish and hold and due benevolence blahbla) can also be interpreted in the favor of a woman - because those words are intentionally abstract so that party in power can juggle with them as willed. So when you ask, "where is this in the marriage vows" you are kinda owning yourself with your stupidity, that is all. That she cannot deny you sex is at this point, simply an opinion.
>>85848027>Where is unlimited sex in the marriage vows?>The vow you give is to take care of each other in happiness and misfortune, and having no libido is in fact quite unfortunate illness. So you vowed to still continue caring even if she cant put out.To have and to hold doesn't mean unlimited cuddles, it is literally a euphemism for sexual intimacy and the reason why if a marriage has not been consumated it's null and void.The second is women agree to honor and obey.I swear women are fucking retarded and don't understand the meaning of anything.
>>85848027>>85848187Incase you keep playing pretend and try and apply retarded modern feminist bullshit to the unchanged vows....
>>85848246Such a vow does exist, I already wrote about this. You just ignore the part that vows were made and then go on to say vows aren't even a thing, moving the goalposts once it became too obvious that you were wrong.I'll say it again, just don't get married if you find the idea of marriage distasteful. That would be far more ethical than getting married knowing there are vows and expectations only to try and go out of your way to break and violate them. Marriage isn't for everyone. Pretty much every bad marriage is because one or both partners just weren't marriage material but did so anyway and used deception to hurt another person for their own benefit. In marriage you are no longer allowed to only care about yourself. It's one flesh, there is a duty to one another.
>>85848027Libido is not a necessary component to spreading your legs.
>>85847571Congratulations, you just discovered what betabuxxing is. Enjoy your husband!
genetic diversification drive
>>85848321>symbolizesit should be literal. both should be literal property of each other minus some reasonable limits. people turn everything into wishy washy gay larp
>>85848514Funny thing is she would not be the tiniest bit happy with that. The whole point of feminism is getting a house with anything and everything else they want in exchange for occasionally dusting the side table and taking 10 minutes to throw together some hamburger helper was an unbearable burden on top of having to be nice to their kids and occasionally continue to have sex with the person they used sex as a weapon to ensnare him into buying her shit in the first place. It's basically a terrorism because on top of wanting sexual exclusivity so she doesn't give him stds, he also wants to snuggle sometimes.
>>85848473Fun fact, the concept of Marital Rape is a modern day construct.We are now seeing WHY that is, with women claiming rape and filing for no fault divorce to maximize payout.
it's literally a mortal sin to deny sex (for the purposes of reproduction) in a marriage, regardless if its the husband or wife, according the Catholic moral theologyits called the marital debt
>>85848627holy shit that is brutal
