Discussions about dating apps are genuinely surreal when women join in. They unironically claim that getting lots of likes and matches is just as bad, or even worse than getting no likes and matches. >Oh no, I have so much food available, but I don't want most of that food, I only want the most yummy food so I have to choose, this is literally worse than starving to deathSeriously what the fuck
>>85850908Ideally they would get just one match: a 7ft tall lean muscular handsome vampire billionaire who's dominant in bed, but is also a male feminist who voted for Kamala, but also isn't a bitch ass with no backbone and pays for dates and who for some odd reason is obsessed with her average ass.
>>85850908That is a well endowed bird.
>>85850908the internet has made everyone retarded and everything need to be one extreme or the other. why is everyone frothing at the mouth about such a basic convo?women as a whole benefit from much more attention vs men, but there's still things they need to wary of on dating apps. to think otherwise is equally as retarded. the problem starts when they try to equate their experiences to men's because it comes across as a massive lack of self awareness. they're not starving in a desert to the point that they needs to eat anything off the floor, so why would anyone expect them to behave that way? if a woman doesn't need to eat, then food alone isn't going to sway her decisions.this is all literally because people just cant admit privilege where they have it and can't stop equating their experiences to others to try and play up how hard things are for them
>>85850908Another thing I encountered is that they insult you for being sad/demoralized from not being desired. Like not being desired is a concept so alien to them that they can't even imagine how that feels
>>85850908the problem isn't that there's a lot of choices it's that if you choose wrong then he's going to be abusive or a rapist or pedo or creepy like that's not something men have to worry about but for women you have to worry about your safety and also trying to find someone your compatible with
>>85850908Those things probably clack around like picrel whenever he flies
>>85850908>robots tell me who to dateYou're basically a p-zombie.
>>85851301Men still have to worry about malicious women too, even when they hardly get any choices
"the satiated will never believe the hungry"
>>85850908women were not built for choosing mate, male stronger species have coercive logic. and in human lacking ovulation, there can't exist alpha to guard all for females to detect who alpha is. it is either socially sanctioned pairing so a single male invests or random pairing and paternity is uncertain for guys so she is thrown out or her kid risks being infanticide if survives from lack of social resourcewomen's heterosexuality is also built to activate in post-paired like context. with multiple offers and no-post paired setting, she just gets anxiety of the doom route it would've let to ancestrally. brain was meaningfully patched last before neolithic revolution
>>85851301I get that, that's genuinely one of the things that suck about being a women. But still, I've seen most women saying how having too many options is just as bad or even worse than having no options at all. And then stuff like "Men have low effort profiles, they don't put effort into conversations etc." The vast majority of women's profiles are extremely low effort, a few shitty selfies and either no bio or some variation of "I like food, traveling and music" and conversations with them are utterly boring. The safety thing is a valid complaint. But otherwise, women have it far better when it comes do dating. And like, even men can choose wrong and end up dating a crazy bitch who'll mentally abuse them and/or use them as a wallet
>>85850908I get it. Imagine if you were trying to find a partner but just got flooded with a bunch of pajeets saying they wanted to fuck you.
>>85851301I really don't feel sorry for women that get abused because they chose them>>85852395A bunch of indian women wanting to have sex with me is just my typical wet dream
>>85850908With "join in" you mean some internet discussion rather than a face to face one because you don't know any woman in real life and anyone who's actually having sex isn't having your dumb internet idpol gender discussions to begin with.
>>85853174I never said they were women.
>>85853332I know plenty of women irl. But they're in long term relationship so they don't use dating apps and are far less retarded.
>>85853905Well I did, your hypothetical was too open.Indian pajeeta harem for me. Scammers for you.You lost.
>>85854471Wow, that's... just like I said, actual people who actually have sex don't discuss these things and only terminally online permavirgins do.
>>85854606Have fun with your theoretical victory. It doesn't change the point that women are inundated with literal shit choices for partners so they're only slightly better off with having the option to pick through shit if they want to try to find someone decent.
>>85855875>women blah blah blah women blah blahKek who on this board cares?I have a gf I love. If foids can't get chad tough shit I guess why don't you crusade for women where it's not a waste of time?
