>calling women whores is bad because...because of generalization! Is it generalization when more than 95% of that group fits the description? Of course, there's good women, but they are like 1 in 100. That doesn't change the main claim If that's the case then everything outside of math doesn't matter, because there's exceptions for basically anything
Calling most women whores is bad because it devalues the meaning of this word. If everyone is a whore, nobody really is. If its normal, there is no shame. Its a completely meaningless insult at this point.
>>85852050That's retarded. If everyone was a murderer, everyone would be a murderer. Something being common does not change it's morality and properties A robber is evil, a rapist is worse and still evil, a murderer is even worse and still evil. Just because there's degrees of evilness it does not make it meaningless
>>85852042Calling women whores is bad because it hurts their feelings, and simps have to protect them, even if it's the truth
