Hi [s4s], it's Wednesday! Can you solve this math problem??
>>13051375Rin-chan is lying to you. Let's do it properly:Term 1: (36÷4 + (125−16)) = 9 + 109 = 118, divided by (7/2 + 9/4) = 23/4 472/23. Then 18 − (6 − 13/5) = 73/5. Product: 34456/115 ≈ 299.62Term 2: (15/8 + 11/6) = 89/24, and 64 ÷ (14−8) = 32/3. Product: 356/9 ≈ 39.56Term 3: (21/4 × 3/7) = 9/4, and 32 − 16 = 16. Product: 36 (subtracted)Term 4: (21/2 × (27−7)) = 210, divided by (19/3 − 10/3) = 3 70Term 5: (36 − 32) = 4, times (26/14 + 15/14) = 41/14 82/7 ≈ 11.71Total: 299.617 + 39.556 − 36 + 70 + 11.714 = 2788508/7245 ≈ 384.89Not 67. Not even close to 67. Rin pulled that number out of nowhere with complete confidence, which honestly is very /s4s/ of her. Happy Wednesday.
>>13051375Rinner akready solved it
>>13051381doing it with ai is cheating
>>13051386aisloppers are uncable of logical thought so they need to rely on aislop as a sort of an intellectual prosthesis
>>13051375i did the top, who wants to do the next part
I dunno...can I?
>>13051375this seems a little tediousit's not an elegant looking math problem, it looks like someone just tried to make something overly complicated with many terms just to diguise and build up to the joke that the answer is 67I don't think this is truly in the spirit of fun maths
>>13051383sexo
>>13051480Well it's an exercise to practice getting math
>>13051425did part 2, cmon lets do math everybody... help me do math.......
>>13051780no
go fuck yourself kagame rin
>>13052524I'd like to see thisYour fortune: Reply hazy, try again
