today, I remind them
WHAT LE FUCKYour fortune: Better not tell you now
This is really funny to meYour fortune: Outlook good
savedwill post any time yuji decides to get uppity
Yuii keeps wanting me to say that I invented Dolores as an AI hoax because I made some slop edits, but I totally didn't. The original Dolores pictures were real.
>>13223978we believe you bavi, he really shot himself in the foot with the whole AI excuse thing... anyone can check and see that the 2 originals blatantly weren't AI
Creepiest Yuji arc thus far. Just when you thought Katie Peach was bad
>>13224006Imagine Yuji fucking Dolores while this song blasts in the background:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-2dIuV34cs
I don't think the original Delores posts were made by Yuji. It was just someone trolling. What convinces me is that the filesize of the Dolores images are very small, just a few dozen KB. When Yuji posts other pictures he takes, they are usually over a MB. Therefore the original Dolores photos were not taken by Yuji and were likely just renamed to look as such. Now where did they come from? That I don't know.
I think everyone on s4s is a pedo, nothing is gained by proving one of them isThe problem is how nasty and disruptive some people are
>>13224022this. no one here has a problem with that "chldrn" poster and it shows.
>>13224027i mean, if they were hit by a meteor tomorrow i wouldn't be upseti just hide their threadsi'm not morally outraged about it or anything but i don't want our future technocratic hellstate showing it to an AI jury when i'm inevitably indicted for not willingly selling my organs
>>13224027everyone had a problem with that poster, there is just nothing we can do about him so we just avoid his threads
>>13224027it would be a problem if he started spamming or posting ugly thingsalso I'm pretty sure there's more than one of themI am one of them lole but I don't like posting porne
>>13224027The first post is literally THREADHIDDEN
I wish I could get a catdoll before le ccp shut down their child love doll options :^(
>>13224027>>13224022I hate those pedo posters too, but it just feels like I can't really do anything about it cause they don't give a shit when you call them out on it, I can only hide the threads. And to our knowledge at least those people are mostly focused on drawings, while Yuji buys realistic looking child doll and adds minors offsite
>>13224013likely to have happened tbh
>>13224050lots of people on this board adds minors offsite, what makes yuji so unique? is it the fact that he documents it here himself? the last time i saw a s4s discord leak there were dozens of namefags in there, they're all the same
>>13224050I don't think that's worth caring about eitherwe're on s4s, I don't want people being ugly in my line of sight, and Yuji Sakai makes ugly posts, so do most namefigs, their ugliness is the crime that matters
>>13224058>>13224060It feels like y'all are just saying "you shouldn't do what you can because there will always be things that you can't" and that's some bunk way of thinking man
>>13224058>s4s discordthose two words shouldn't be used in the same sentenceYour fortune: Better not tell you now
>>13224063im just saying yuji isnt unique because hes a pedo because so are a lot of other people posting here
>>13224060 (beary bery based)
>>13224063any who doesn't like loli or anyone who types "y'all" shouldn't even be on 4chan, nevermind s4s, the most mentally ill board there iswhat did you think you'd gain by coming here? nobody is getting cancelled here
>>13224066I'm not really seeing your point, you're like trying to be contrarian or something but you're just saying what we all agree on? Idk maybe I'm misinterpreting here, I don't see anything wrong with pissing off Yuji by not letting the board forget what he's done
>>13224071https://voca.ro/13hrQqcyn061
>>13224082They're a self admitted pedo + I get people saying that to me a lot I think they associate it with niggers or something? I'm from the great plains we all say it here and there's no blacks so idgi it just wasn't worth replying to
>>13216963
>>13224082>>13224086notice what I saidI said people who TYPE y'all, not say itThere's a certain kind of people who type that word online, and they typically don't say it offline, and they're not necessarily black or southern American, they are using it as liberal everyperson speak, to act friendly yet authoritative on matters of social politicsThe bottom line is social politics do not belong on s4s
>>13224096Well, I've never heard of that, I guess I get what you mean but I'm not whatever that is
y'all make a lot a sense ngl
ya"ll
Living in a trailer sounds comfy. Might look into it
>>13224137Manufactured home. You want a manufactured home
you'll
yes remind them any idiot can impersonate me and you retards eat it upbot thread
>>13224157
>>13224078but i'm not a pedo never was never will be i used to hunt pedos give them malware and/or report them to the fedsi have quite an impressive body count on foreign hackers
You do have another creepy doll though, which is already kinda weird but you seem not to have any normal kind of shame about, by normal shame i mean most people wouldn't admit if they were doing that, would probably be embarrassed I think if someone found out, but you flaunt it.. Not hard to undestand why people might believe you have a more creepy doll, and you realised you fucked up in admitting to that one
>>13224164LMAO >>13224167nothing of that ever happened
>>13224167Maybe it was someone getting back at you, someone you hackered
>>13224167Why do you feel the need to always insert something from decades agoYour fortune: Reply hazy, try again
some of you:https://x.com/lemongrasshate/status/2107317350190248280
>>13224216>https://x.com/lemongrasshate/status/2107317350190248280
>>13224218who are you quoting?
>>13224221that was a correct and valid use of the quote function you silly robot
>>13224228you're invalid and you need correcting
>>13224228thank you for standing up for my post friend, but for next time you see this "who are you quoting?", you're supposed to not reply when they say this.
>>13224239That was proper usage of the quotation feature. If you'd like to fight this claim, please bequeath yourself before the snek court.Your fortune: Good Luck
>>13224239I called you robot because you are copying something without understanding why its said. You don't just say "who are you quoting" to every greentext, you say it when someone is not using it to quote someone, but in this case they literally were quoting someone
>>13224242I have to fight injustice where I see it
>>13224242forgive him, he's not from s4s, he just came here on a cancel culture discord bandwagon, however he did not realise this is a pedo board where everyone is a pedo and so trying to cancel anyone on those grounds is stupid
>>13224249we ain't on the same team bud keep it movin
>>13223954Unironically this is, at worst, an early 2000s JP/CN image that was lost to time until it found its way here. It probably is an AI image, though. Extremely low resolution image, VERY artifacted JPG. The doll itself seems to be made of foam or a blowup doll, though I dont think it's a blowup doll since theres no crinkling. The heavy artifacts would lead you to think it's been reuploaded multiple times and the quality has degraded over the years, but theres no similar results for it as far as I can tell. Tineye sucks as a service and I've never had much success using it to find sources of images every time I've ever used it. Either the image is artifacted so much from being compressed so it can be uploaded in early 2000s internet to save bandwith, or it was compressed to hide AI markings. It's way too low quality of an image for an AI checker to see anything that it looks for, not that those are accurate all the time anyway. The images themselves have things in them that don't make sense, namely the image of her laying on her face has a very distinct seam on her arm, this seam is gone in the second image on the arm you would expect it on and the other arm its very faint and washed out, not consistent at all. The pattern of her clothes in the one on her back is too perfectly lined up as if it's a one-piece swimsuit, but theres a clear hem line. The pattern would not be perfectly lined up like this even if it was made from the same cut of fabric. The image of her on her face, the hem line has a distinct orange thread, but the one on her back uses thread that matches the rest of the image. There's also distinction of what the logo on her shirt even is which annoys me. tldr probably ai inconstent low quality image thats not even consistent with images yuji posts
>>13224290These are good observations, I could agree it's very likely it's a old image and the inconsistency with typical yuji image uploads is an oddity, but I don't think it's AI. The seam on the arm really just looks like it's placed further on the back side of the arm, which makes it harder to see in the front facing image & I can kinda still see the seam on the left arm a little bit and it looks like it's in the same position on the arm as the backwards pic. To me the pattern repeating on the clothes isn't a very convincing, along with the hem line one also kind of just looking like a difference in angle making the line more apparent. I followed the older dolores threads too and someone else pointed out the logo part but I also don't think it really looks that weird, with the shape on the top left corner of the star clearly looking like a cutesy cartoon cat/hamster character, but the gray shape on the right is hard to distinguish because of the quality admittedly. And on the tineye thing, I ran the images through other image searches, google images version and yandex, and they both didn't come up with any results either. Not arguing if it's Yuji's or not though I don't really care about that
