This just looks depressing.
>>16957858Right is the Mun from KSP
>>16957858What's really depressing is how many fools believe this garbage: Supposedly, 53 years ago, we landed on the moon. And now we only have the technology to do a flyby and have to wait 2-3 more years for them to figure out how to land on the moon.
>>16957858whyI think it looks cool
>>16957937Digital technology reveals the washed-out, tired reality we actually live in.
>>16957959you are looking at ISO 50000 image of the Earth illuminated only by the moonshine.
>>16957935Hello, retard. I'm just stopping by to inform you of the following:>Apollo 8 was a lunar flyby>Apollo 11 was the landing>Artemis II is a flyby>Artemis IV is scheduled to be a landing
Mommy will put a hundred dollarbill under your pillow for losing your first tooth.
>>16958058Hello retard, I'm just stopping by to inform you of the following:>You will never go to space
>>16957935When they did it before, they also went with an incremental, methodical approach building up to it with test flights, rather than jumping all the way to a landing right away. Which is why Apollo 11 was the first landing, rather than Apollo 7 or 8. I’m sure there was plenty of childish impatience over the test flights back then too.It would be stupid to try and rush through it and jump straight to a landing this time. Just because the 50 years newer Artemis spacecraft has the same general objectives, doesn’t mean it all works the same
obligatory saganhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wupToqz1e2g
>>16958093You have to understand that these posters are actually retarded and have no attention spans left due to years of irradiating their brains with TikTok and porn. The fact that it hasn't happened yet means it never will. This is what they believe.
>>16958094obligatory Perlmanhttps://youtu.be/69C4ZL6uG_U?t=133
>>16957959film is closer to what our eyes actually seedigital is always blown out. It takes a lot to capture color actually
are we having a family album review?
this one here is the first photo from another celestial body, made by soviet luna 9 in february 1966
>>16958093I would argue in a sense that Artemis is more rushed than Apollo since the design is immature as they keep fucking with the SLS blocks and overall mission architecture, so we don't get as much useful test data on each flight as the Apollo engineers did and we end up taking unnecessary risk.
>>16958220earthrise from american lunar orbiter a couple of months later
>>16958077What an embarassingly childish retort
>>16958393not as embarrassing as a 30+ year old space "railfan"actual railfans are more respectable than you
>>16957858>This just looks depressing.oh yeah...>>16957935you really don't understand how going to the moon works. moron.
first ever view of the far side of the moon, made in 1959 by Luna 3
Bravo, NASA.
>>16958644Artemis 2 is equivalent to Apollo 8. Dumb fuck
>>16958621The far side of the moon is some shitty analog horror video from youtube?
>>16957959Bullshit, what I saw on our CRTs and films or digital cameras even in the 2000's felt a lot closer to what my eyes see than what we have now and I got the tech to prove it. For motor racing in particular it feels like I have a blurry piss filter hell, worse than wearing sunglasses or polarized lenses in real life.>>16957935It's fucking rocket science.
>>16958653They're using fucking Microsoft Outlook in SPACE.
>>16958644This mission was very fun. Lots of memes and everyone got home safe. No idea why they brought a Canadian, though. Pity?
>>16958609I'll reply with this image whenever issues like "trans genocide" or "rape" come up. Thanks.
>>16957935We always had the technology you fool.
Kubrick filmed the moon landings.
>>16957858>>16957959Photography truly is an art and a science
>>16958015damn, you know what camera they used?
>>16960543>nobody:>poltard: TRANNIES
Is the moon.....ghey?We already knew that space itself was ghey, but are the things that are in space...ghey also?Are we in the fruity Verse' bro (No Homo)?
>>16962323ywnbaw
>>16957935>Bro there's no need to test drive this new car we manufactured, we made a car 80 years ago and it worked fine!
>>16958157>digital is always blown outWe've long had modern techniques to counter that.
I think space is so cool, but it's so scary
>>16957935Why is it that even on a science board we can't escape these people?
>>16957959What's funny is that the digital image actually looks flatter, like we're looking at a disc.
>>16957935Beautiful levels of retardation on display your a perfect specimen we should cut you open and study your brain so we can know exactly how not to be like you
>>16957935>all these seething replies over the fake moon landing and fake trip to outer space
>>16958094reddit
>>16957858>>16957959Quite literally fake and gay.
>>16965161>NASA in the walls again
>>16965161Theorizing that we're going to come full circle and have another "moon is cheese" "moon-landing is fake" "earth is flat" revolution. I'm not sure how or when, but I'm ready for the idiocy.
they just keyed in ugly exposure settingsmind you they were at 6500km not 100km so its mega zoomed in so of course the ground detail is worse and that might have to do with exposure decisionsnot a photographer me
>>16965401Good, idgaf.
>>16957935Lovely bait. Delicious. Scrumptious even.
>>16967006you sound like a faggot
>>16958609That's just a category error. Small things can be very important.
>>16967007and I know you like it.
>>169586442 microsoft outlooks, 1 capsule.
>>16957959literally day and night
>>16958644Based. Microsoft BTFO for all eternity.
>>16958609>Every human being who ever was is in the dotFalse, you can see the outline of your mom below the dot
>>16957858Sad!
>>16957858All you had to do was say thank you
>>16957858No it doesn't. *You* are just depressed.Get help, it's available.
>>16957858Space is depressing
>>16961847When he was making it, was he aware of what was happening? Like did the CIA spooks tell him to make a potential documentary of what it should look like, or did they steal his shit while he was making space odyssey
>>16958644Apollo 11's computer completely shit the bed. They had to land by hand.
>>16957935>We haven't been on the flying rock in decades therefore we never landed on the rock and we forgot how to land on the rockDo you really want the United States to spend another $20 billion tax dollars to go walk around on the big rock again just so that you can deny it again anyway and say it didn't happen again? Lol.
>>16971450>$20 billionQuite literally nothing compared to the amount of tax dollars spent on Israel, niggers, and bombing brown people, walking around on the big rock at least looks cool.
