I've been thinking about this lately. If we look at certain sexually dimorphic traits in female humans, especially ones that are considered sexy in girls, they're also what makes meat taste good. For example, the female body has thinner skin, lower collagen density, and even a less rigid collagen bond structure. That's responsible for the soft body quality in attractive girls, and it also makes meat more tender and delicious. Women also have less muscle (therefore less tough meat) than men and a higher normal body fat percent range. Less of that fat is visceral fat which would just be gross excess fat that doesn't help the quality of the meat and more subcutaneous fat and intramuscular fat. In particular, intramuscular fat is the source of marbling, which results in juicier, more tender meat. Girls also have more fat concentrated in the breasts, thighs, and butt, which are both sexual points of interest in the female body and the main body parts that would be eaten for meat. Looking at diets, (stereotypes and reality) girls eat more plants (fruits and veggies), carbs, and sweets and less meat compared to guys, which is the exact diet that makes animals taste better. It just seems that biologically and culturally, feminine means tasty.I wonder if anyone else explored this question. This is the only thing I found.https://kirstenkoza.com/scoop-scandal/contemplating-cannibalism-male-female-meat-tastier/The conclusion is that while female animals taste better than male animals, it's because of the male scent gland which humans don't have, but I find that answer unsatisfactory because of the traits above. And humans do have scent glands, don't they? Like the apocrine sweat gland? Science shows that male body odor is stronger and more unpleasant than female body odor. If you look at practices of cannibalism throughout history, you'll see a pattern of female flesh being more prized than male flesh, so there must be some truth in it being tastier. Does this make sense?
>If you look at practices of cannibalism throughout history, you'll see a pattern of female flesh being more prized than male flesh, so there must be some truth in it being tastier.It could also be for any other reason, like imagine some tribe eating virgins, doesn't mean virgin meat is tastier. Maybe Trump's buddy Epstein knows a thing or two about that
the logic is backwards
>>16970060Boys eating girls is grotesque and unnatural. Girls eating boys is the natural order. Boys belong inside girls' tummies.
>>16970250What do you mean by backwards?
>>16970283That can't be true when girls taste so much better than guys.
I guess my question isn't so much if women do taste better. It's more why it almost seems like girls are designed to be eaten with all these sexually dimorphic female traits which are the same ones that make meat delicious, tender, and juicy. And what's traditionally associated with what makes a girl sexually attractive would mean her flesh being tastier if she were to be eaten.
>>16970497It's just youthful traits. Old livestock is tough and full of collagenous tissue, as opposed to young livestock with tender meat
>>16970060All I know is you never eat no brains, that Kuru shit is nasty.
>>16970497>>16970250
>>16970576>>16970289
>>16970500>Old livestock is tough and full of collagenous tissueIf I understand correctly, it's actually the other way around. You lose collagen as you age. Collagen's main function is to provide structure to skin, tendons, and tissue, so collagen degradation results in rough, saggy skin. It's not as simple as less collagen = more tender meat.>It's just youthful traitsThat's definitely true and explains it to some extent. Women are more neotenous than men (and female beauty standards are more focused on youthfulness), so that gives them more childlike traits that results in juicy, more tender, delicious meat. But it doesn't explain all of it. For example, when girls hit puberty (so the opposite of retaining childlike traits), they store more fat in their breasts, butt, and thighs, which not only are sexualized on the female body, but they also just happen to be the body parts commonly eaten for meat. Some of these gender differences are even cultural and not biological like diets (unless there's a biological drive for men and women to prefer certain foods). If we look at what girls stereotypically eat (and the stereotype is true), they eat more plants (fruits and veggies), carbs, and sugar and less meat compared to guys, which is exactly how tasty animals eat. That almost feels too on the nose to not be made up. Like if I were to look at these traits in a vacuum, it wouldn't be inconceivable to conclude that girls were designed to be eaten so they're intentionally made to be the tastier sex.
>>16970536Yup, the infectious prions are most concentrated in the brain, so eating the brain carries the most risk of contracting kuru. However, that mainly just applies to bodies infected with kuru.
>>16970900it's the wrong way around
>>16970907What's the wrong way around?
>>16970918the logic
>>16970919So what would the logic be the right way around?
>>16970060Which taste better: Booby burgers, or weener dogs?
>>16970920not>feminine means tastybut>tasty means feminine
