In the age of AI, we can safely say that Arts are mogging rn right.>Science>replicability crisis>nothing new invented or discovered in decades>Technology:>AI chatbots>Engineering:>nothing new is even being build>computer chips getting smaller>Arts:>Dynamic>Constantly refreshing>Upgraded by AI>Only remaining field with societal innovation>Expands the Human's Being>Mathematics:>ehhh
>>16980118The arts are the first thing AI effectively replaced. Artists are already obsolete.Sucks to suck I guess.
16980122
>>16980122> arts are already obsoleteArt has been massively devalued. But ai cant do any practical work you'd want from a competent artist. At all.That of course doesn't really change the fact that (((they))) successfully crippled and sabotaged arts place in society.
>>16980118this is why i am becoming a ceramicist rather than a STEMtard
Art can never be entirely devalued, because its value was always subjective at its core, and people will value the means of creation alongside the end result.The same can’t be said for other fields of endeavor.
>>16982117Anon, AI can design models and then program 3D printers or mechanical arms, etc, to create them.
>>16982123That would be such a ludicrous amount of work I don't think the lazy AI user could be bothered to do it. Mass produced ceramics already are made efficiently and simply so I can not think of an economical reason for using AI for that reason, and artsy ceramic pieces, like a lot of contemporaneous work, are too mechanically complicated for current machinery, even if it was controlled by AI. Also even if I was wrong and this all came to pass there would still be conceptual areas for artists to work in, since AI (especially the future, more locked down surveillance state models that will inevitably appear) can't criticize its chosen people masters, for example.
