I'm not a physicist or something, but i'm really interested in your thoughts.Our 3d space is constantly being increased infinitely, and the dots are constantly attracting to each other, that means constantly stretching space will negate the gravitation and make the dots not attracted at all, and even go away from each other on certain distances, which can be interpreted as a dark energy?And.. to expand, it needs to be expandable, and if it infinitely expandable it means that there's an infinite distances on microscopic scales between any point in the universe, in which points could be attracted from each other with unknown rules. and so if space is infinite then it means everything is a "singularity"? Am i dumb?
>>16980546>in which points could be attracted from each other with unknown rulesin which points could be repelled from each other with unknown rules*Mistype
this looks fake as fucknot even trying to conspiracyfag, but where is the unedited version
>>16980554wdym by unedited version?I'am just asking a question.
>>16980559Like other post or what?
>>16980554I'm sure the raw data is available on some space .org page
>>16980586dafuck you talking about?This sounds like a veiled insult, i would better talk to irl with someone, go fuck yourself.
>>16980546>I'm not a physicist >[Insert retard questions you'd only understand the answers to with at least a bachelor's in physics]>Am I dumb? Yes.
>>16980546Anon, there's no "infinite distance on microscopic scales", you don't understand measure theory and infinity.And Newton's gravitational constant is a universal constant, and Planck's too, and the size of an atom is a well defined quantity.>constantly stretching space will negate the gravitationThat's only true for objects that are even now far away. For objects that are close enough now, the dark energy in the space between them is weaker than gravity and thus they will become one in the future. This is the case for example for the Milky way and Andromeda.
>>16980590you know space agencies release their raw data to the public, right? you can go download it.
>>16980554>where is the unedited version4.6 billion light years away, behind the galaxy cluster that's causing gravitational lensing.
>>16980546>Am i dumb?Yes and no. You are trying to make sense out of a system which parts you don't truly get. You're mistaking these definitions for simple building blocks, you do not envision them in their formulaic states, therefore completely disregarding any effects that would occurr by interacting with them. Instead, you're creating humanities billionth theory on how the universe might play out to be, something you could've quickly discarded if you were actually aware of the true interplay between these parts. You're not lacking creativity nor curiosity, you're lacking formal education on this matter. I'm not a physicist or something tho.
>>16982021>You're mistaking these definitions for simple building blocksnice analogy
