who denied the big bang, cosmic expansion and black holes. Why is he still held in such high regard?? I literally have a better understanding of the universe than him and I'm a midwit.
>>16986254>I literally have a better understanding of the universe than hima rocket uniformly accelerates at g from rest in a flat metric to the andromeda galaxy, while decelerating at -g for the second half of the trip. assume a round trip. how much time elapses in the rocket frame? no google allowed!!
>>1698626045 years
>>16986260this is like asking "how long is a piece of string?"
>>16986262wrong.>>16986265wrong.
>>16986266To look outward to find the beginning of the universe is wrong, this should be in mind.
>>16986260>>16986266NTA but I guess you would need to solve the ODE[math]\frac{dv}{dt}=g\sqrt{1-\frac{v(t)^2}{c^2}}[/math]with[math]v(0)=0[/math]then solve for[math]t_x[/math][math]s=\int_{0}^{t_x} v(t)dt[/math]with[math]s=\frac{d}{2}=1,25ly[/math]and finally[math]\tau=\int_0^{t_x} \sqrt{1-\frac{v(t)^2}{c^2}}[/math]and multiply the answer by 4 due to symmetry.I hope I'm wrong so I can learn something new
I'm superdeterminatistic about telling my boss not to be around me in the afterlife.
>>16986254Why do non-Scientists like to insult Einstein so much? Is it because he was Jewish? He developed an entire subject that they teach in universities. Lol.
>>16986334This Jew obsession is unironically a mental illness. It should be treated in hospitals
>>16986334He stole the work of other scientists and didn't give them any credit.
>>16986334Einstein was racist
>>16986334>>16986339It's a simple algorithm.If rich evil person is Jewish, that's evidence of the conspiracy. If rich evil person is not Jewish (which is most of them), then they're controlled by the Jews. If rich evil person is not Jewish and obviously not controlled by the Jews, they're heckin awesome opposition to the Jews. You can never refute their delusions because they're unburdened by the shackles of reality.
>>16986353>You can never refute their delusions because they're unburdened by the shackles of reality.Maybe watch fucking news sometimes you ignorant fool.Oh you are Jewish... Ok
>>16986530And when the news features non-Jews being evil?
>>16986334>>16986339>>16986353Hi jidf, still defending liars and plagiarists?
>>16986530My apologies, I forgot a step. If someone says something contradicting your world view, accuse them of being Jews who wish to subvert you.
>>16986542I'm not Jewish and I hate plagiarists. Prove me that Einstein was one.>>16986599kek
>>16986260decelerating at -g? is it accelerating the entire trip?
>>16987132Yeah that problem makes no sense. But it does if you assume he meant +g. Everyone can solve this however, so idk how solving this proves OP is smarter than Einstein (kek, it's ridiculous to even type this)
>>16986260only half a g over 2.5mil ly? you won't even make it before the end of the universe.
>>16986262>>16986262>andromeda galaxy,>45 yearsA quick google tells me that the Andromeda galaxy is at 2.5 million light-years away from Earth.The quickest relativistic time would be >2.5 million years.Accelerating 1g until light speed would need :c = 1g * tt = c/gt = 300.000.000/9.8 (no google, so I dont know exactly the numbers).t ~ 30 million seconds ~ 1 year2.5 million years is >> than 1 year, so the response is practically 2.5 million years.But the guy travelling would aging much slower, and this is not in OP question.
Big Bang cosmology is pure fiction, Penrose CCC is the true model of the universe and on the verge of being proven once he Proves the existence of Hawking Points beyond all shadow of a doubt. Black holes and cosmic expansion also likely suffer from many base logical fallacies and misunderstandings that color our current theories. So while I admit Einstein was a likely fraud and a shifty jew, on these points he's not incorrect.
>>16986254>annon reads from textbook of stablished science>einstien and peers are on the frontiers of human knowledgeYou forgot we stand on the shoulders of giants
>>16986260assuming t of 2.5 million lightyears and an acceleration that won't pulverize your entire ship and assuming that you don't impact anything on your way there it would take about....7.5*10^13 years
>>16987190Nice bait. I *almost* raged.
>>16987254Wrong.
>>16986284Almost correct but the exponent needs to be 3/2 in the ODE and s=1.25Mly instead of 1.25ly. And you also need to actually solve it.
He was a jew also
>>16987293Oh well what is it then mr smartypants, I don't see you doing anything
>>16987328See >>16987298The ODE can be solved by separating the variables and substituting u=v/c>smartypantsI'm retarded
>>16987338I didn't ask for your paper dumbass I'm not your teacher
>>16987346Failed theoretical physics I award
>>16987352I got a theoretical degree in physics
>>16987359And can't solve a 101 special relativity problem?
>>16986254>who denied the big bang, cosmic expansion and black holes. Okay well none of that shit is real either.
>>16987364That's why it's theoretical.
>>16987364sure I can, you just assume you're very free to travel through space like some sort of superman
>>16987375kek, good one>>16987382>you just assume you're very free to travel through space like some sort of supermanThe only thing I assumed is what the problem requires, namely that the laws of special relativity apply>sure I canThen let's see that solution
>>16987384I am the most dangerous / dominant man. This ain't even a hurdle for me.
>>16987387I surpass [the problem] with mental strength alone. It's really a 1 to me.
>>16987389If we move on from pure agility, to things that concern intelligence, you're already safe since the requisition stage.
I just realized that this board is 99% schizos with 0 problem solving abilities. This is like pol or x 2.0
>>16987384>Then let's see that solutionit's called gravity
If Einstein was alive today he'd just use AI and become a turbo powered space god and guru,
>>16987415Anon... In the rocket's frame of reference the mass of the rocket doesn't increase. Are you sure about that physics degree?
>>16987446oh, so you are massless, then?
>>16987454We're in the rocket's frame of reference. I'm starting to think you're even more retarded than me.
>>16987461>We're in the rocket's frame of referenceBut the meteor you hit wasn'tF = m * ...what was it again?
>>16987465Quote the word "meteor" from the problem statement.
>>16987466The problem being that as you're enjoying a comfy periodic 1g acceleration relative to your reference frame, in contrast, to the outside reference frame your acceleration is 1g..2g..3g..4g...5g...I'll leave the rest of the solution to the reader, by now you should figure it out.
>>16987472>1g acceleration relative to your reference frameWrong. We don't accelerate to our reference frame, that's the definition of reference frame that in it we're always in the origin and thus all futher derivatives are also 0.>1g..2g..3g..4g...5g...Wrong. Even according to classical mechanics to the outside it would be a constant g forever. With special relativity from outside it will approach zero as we approach the speed of light.Anon assume an ideal world where there isn't and never will be a meteor on the direct path towards Andromeda. Now solve the problem. No more excuses.
>>16987477>Anon assume an ideal world where there isn't and never will be a meteor on the direct path towards Andromeda. Now solve the problem. No more excuses.And that meteor cruising at gazillion speed would have a 100% chance to crash in a single atom of Hydrogen in all that void...
>>16987472>comfy periodic 1g acceleration relative to your reference frameLike being on Earth.> to the outside reference frame your acceleration is 1g..2g..3g..4g...5g..Constant acceleration means velocity is increasing, not acceleration.
>>16987495In our ideal universe there's nothing in the space between. It's all a perfect void. Just our spaceship. Now solve the problem.
>>16987500velocity and acceleration are all relative, you shouldn't speak of them as absolutes
>>16987505Time to get to 0.9c0.9*c (m/s) = 1g (m/(s*s)) * time (s) * 1+[1/(Lorentz-factor)]Lorentz-factor depends on "c" :1/(1-[(0.9c)/c]^2)Wikipedia says that at 0.9c, Lorentz-factor is 0.436Just multiply Newton's time with (Lorentz factor +1)Etc...
>>16987526Wrong. So you got a degree in theoretical physics but can't solve the most basic special relativity problem which is undergrad second semester. I assume you're american.
>>16986254>>16986334More so, he was a fraud. He just made his own definitions of "space" and simultanity" to fit his retarded assumption of Light beeing non locally constant. The Theory itself has no value since the key words in it are not defined properly. And yes the ether exists. In a year or two this will all cone out.
>>16987517Wrong and wrong. Acceleration is even absolute in relativity. Movement can be absolute to the ether but I understand you follow relativity.
>>16986260You can literally get the answer right by calculating how much time it needs from our perspective, and then integrating over how much time dilation it has how long (depending on the speed). This is the ether view assuming we are close to 0 relative to the ether and whatever random perspective relativity has is equivalent. Even if we move with respect to the ether it's the same.
>>16987190But he's asking from the perspective of the spaceship. When you move so quickly through the ether, your clock goes much slower then a clock resting to the ether. And yes you yourself will be slower in everything. So measured in the slower rate some surprisingly low number comes out but I don't remember now. See my post before. My point is, this is an effect of ether wind, not some magic tensor math that doesn't describe reality.>>16987505Then g would accelerate the spaceship enormously most likely>he doesn't read mach
