I hate to post a reddit thread that I found in a screencap posted on xitter but, please debunk this /sci/
Assume the excluded middle
>>16987426Will there be completion for the top jobs. It's either by vote or competition.
>>16987429Sorry I didn't mean to type this nonsense in this thread I'll go back to /b/ now and join the lobotomites so I can talk to people who *get* me
Feeeeeaaag
>>16987423there's nothing to debunk, either the son is correct or he isn't
>>16987694Either the son is correct and it's 50/50Or the son is incorrect and it's 50/50
It’s a matter of perspective. At a sufficient arbitrary diving line you could say everything is 50/50 or 25/75 or 10/100 etc. From the universe’s perspective everything is 1/1. The issue isn’t math but your son being tricked by a language game.
>>16987423debunk this? Where do you think this originated?
>>16987423If you add up the 50/50 probabilities of the timelike curve of an event from A to B you get the final probability
>>16987423Anything framed dualistically is 50/50, its just word game wankery
is op a faggot? that's not 50/50
>>16987808/sci/ bait threads
>>16987844>timelike curvethat's not a thing
>>16987423either something happens or it doesn't, so all probabilities are 0% or 100% in real life
>>16988650Yes it is, more precisely it's sum vectors for an object moving through spatial dimensions, since time is merely the relative comparison of objects moving with respect to eachother, if you now take this 3d vector, flatten out the space metric and inversely distort the time metric you will end up with a single line that can be used to describe the position of the object anywhere in space with a single value
>>16988592damn nigga
