My daughter wrote this in school, and I thought it was sort of sublime. Like she sorta gets it. I dunno.
She realized that having a time machine would make her a god. But with the complete control over her reality, all questions answered before they are even asked, there is no joy in the existence. So in her manifesto she rejected the godhood and chose to remain in the shackles of our reality.
>>16991150I would travel 10 million years into the future. Fuck it.
It's the sort of answer an enlightened person would give.
>>16991150My son said he would go visit dinosaurs because they're rad, which goes to show that men > women.
>>16991150this is very>what is you didn't eat breakfast todaycodedshe should be able to imagine a world if she traveled back or forward in time 1 or 2 daysI think most people could consider the implications of traveling back in time any amount and it's worrying to think of 'confusing' being why it's bad
>>16991150Your daughter is an unadventurous incurious dumb bitch. says a lot about you op desu.
>>16991188>unadventurous incurious dumb bitchHere is your adventurous, perpetually-finding-herself, intelligent womyn.
>>16991186It's AI slop
>>16991185Your son is retarded. He'd starve to death. The air had significantly less oxygen back then, so you'd be out of breath just trying to walk around, let alone hunt, and all the plants were poisonous. No fruit yet. No veggies yet. Just a bunch of undigestible ferns.
you should reward her with sex
>>16991186>what is you didn't eat breakfast todayRead it again genius.What would it be like if you didn't eat breakfast today?Retard answer: "What do you mean? I didn't eat breakfast today."Normal answer: "I'd be hungry."What would happen if I time traveled?Retard answer: "What do you mean? I can't time travel."Normal answer: "If I time traveled, I would not know what to expect."Hypothetical answered. It's just that the answer was understanding there'd be confusion around what happened. You mistook that for an inability to handle hypotheticals. Possibly because you're... not that bright.
>>16991160Same. Fuck the past and the present.
>>16991150look like neither you nor your wife abused her, good job
>>16991225Let's go one further and say fuck causality, why? Because what did it ever do for us? Make us possible? Who asked it why it gets to decide to make us exist just because we're a causually coherent branch of reality.
>>16991150Science fiction is for people desperate to science reality. She'll get it when she's older.
>>16991250desperate to escape*
>>16991150this isn't /sci/ and I reckon shows pretty clearly how bdaly botted this board is.
>>16991262So badly botted you see posts complaining about bots and know 90% of them are written by bots as well.
>>16991264You're a bot. He's a bot. We're all bots. Quick, what's 1+2. The answer is 3.0000000000145 right?
>>16991274Ha, computers are such shit at maths.They did a test with them asking for a math proof but added a single bit of irrelevent information and the results came back like 70% fucked, showing it never actually was "solving" anything and was merely predicting tokens.The one that fascinates me is they trained a model on something scientific but also a bunch of info about dogs....and when it discussed maths with other AIs.....They Also Began Focusing On Dogs Without Speaking About It!
>>16991185This post proves women are smarter
>>16991262oddly enough it's better than 80% of the botted crap here
>>16991188How fucked up do you have to be as a "person" to call a little girl a dumb bitch
>>16991223how about you kys
>>16991283To be honest, I blame the humans who designed them. Floating point fractions being considered "good enough" even though they clearly deviate from established reality is where it started to go wrong. Use strings internally, make it 100x slower, I don't care, just get the math right. Reeeeeeeee
>>16991224Time travel is more than a hypothetical, it is a metaphysical impossibility, a logical absurdity.Rejecting the premise as retarded is the only logical conclusion. Tell me what a four sided triangle would be like anon.
>>16991293"real numbers" aren't real btw retard
>>16991150>the way she structure the textDude your daughter is showing traits of sexual abuse/molestation. Take her to a gynecological check because if her hymen isnt gone yet it will show laterations.
>>16991150She is fundamentally anti-Faustian.
>>16991290Holy seethe. Kek!
>>16991408>Time travel is more than a hypothetical, it is a metaphysical impossibility, a logical absurdityIt literally happens constantly. What are you talking about? Time moves forward, and time dilation causes things to age differently. Those are two examples of time travel. How is it impossible?
>>16991476The past is that which once existed but no longer does. The future is that which can potentially exist, but does not yet. Attempting to travel through time is attempting to go somewhere that does not exist and is metaphysically impossible.Moving forward in time is not time travel. Time travel implies moving from one time to another by skipping what happens in between.
>>16991480>not posting the original
>>16991488Why does the "original" use a different color text and a different font than the river? Why is the type not centered on the characters and instead offset? Why is there a white box blocking out where the black text would have been?
>>16991499it's a metajoke. you wouldn't get it. maybe metaphysics can help you understand it
>>16991499>newfag
>>16991480>The past is that which once existed but no longer does.>no longer doesYou're sneaking the past-tense into your definition of the past.>The future is that which can potentially exist, but does not yet. Attempting to travel through time is attempting to go somewhere that does not exist and is metaphysically impossible.You just wrote that the future doesn't exist, and now you're stating that it's impossible to "go" somewhere that doesn't exist.Going back in time would require matter to just reverse its state (energy, position, velocity, etc.). Of course, you would need even more energy to do this than exists in that matter.
>>16991552>no longer doesBuy a dictionary. "Does" is a present tense verb.
>>16991552>Going back in time would require matter to just reverse its state (energy, position, velocity, etc.).NTA but the past is under-determined given the present and in any case cannot possibly involve anyone "going" to it by such means because every observer would be reverted as well so there is no possible perspective inside the universe from which time would be actually moving backwards.
OK, let's explain why you can't meaningfully go into the past: You're part of an existing casual chain. You can't change your past, any more than you can lift yourself by your bootstraps. It's physically impossible because if you had a different causal history you would be a different person in a different timeline.
>>16991676But I saw it in da mooooovies!!!
>>16991676Time travel doesn't care about your casual logicTime flows in one direction, it's not inconceivable that this flow could be reversed. Maybe it's impossible, maybe it's not, but again, this is not contingent on you thinking it would just be too weird.
>>16991637As in "no-longer." Why are you trying to evade?
>>16991221The Jurassic Period (~201 to 145 million years ago) had more oxygen.
>>16991764You could go fish in the ocean for food, just as long as you don't pull up us.
>>16991150And what does this have to do with science? Go post it on plebbit, no one gives a shit about what your daughter has say on time machines.
Traveling backwards, they couldn't be part of space/time only time. So space would have to be removed from the body. You could do within you mind with quantum jump or electromagnetism through the veins..
>>16991745Longer is an adverb and has no tense. You have failed yet again.
>>16991789>You could do within you mind with quantum jump
>>16991150I'm time traveling to 1946, getting absolutely loaded rich off the stock market and enjoying the most soulful era of my country where I still have access to most modern conveniences.
>>16991221I can live off stegosaurus chops, which are probably delicious.
>>16991221>He'd starve to death. The air had significantly less oxygen back thenYes, because we eat oxygen and he couldn't take some McDonald's with him.
>>16991292>triggered
>>16991790No, shit. I wasn't referring to grammar, and you know that, but you're obviously just evading.
>>16991150Today is a gift. That is why we call it The Present.
>>16991150Is she hot?
>>16991150adorable for sure
>>16991829As a third party it's more obvious to me that you're retarded.
>>16991797I was at work with a small window. I'll use the AI punctuation next time. damn it..One recent story was I was exploring stars as "liquid metal" with Lattice Structure Theory with Pierre-Marie Robitaille. I had a large quantum jump in the 1800's in France through an esteemed man's life. Got to see all the sights!Pierre-Marie Robitaille has a strong family of scientists. The mind with a strong time connection through family lineage plays a role in people.
