Redpill me on the Nobel price.
>>16991338The recent metal-organic frameworks one means nothing.
>>16991338you can bribe the nobel deciders to get a prize. Common in the humanistic ones like peace and literature
Physics prize jump the shark with climate change 2021 prize. You can learn something reading:https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.1972
>Salam was perpetually sorry that his idea in a draft paper in 1956 suggesting that parity might be violated had not been published after criticism from senior colleagues. His approach to physics afterwards changed from rigorous to scattergun: he wrote (usually with collaborators) about a paper every >month. It was always possible that one might turn out to be right. Even in his letter rebuking me for not using the term Weinberg-Salam, he enclosed a new preprint >describing another alternative theory which, like Bailin and mine, sank without trace. Nor did he worry that other people may have had the same idea. In 1964 he and Ward22 wrote a paper on electromagnetic and weak interactions which should not have been accepted for publication because it just repeated Glashow’s work of 1961.>Hardly any of the more than 1500 of physicists who have cited Salam 1968 in their papers have read the paper.
