>Science board>Nobody here "believes" in ScienceLol.
>>16992194well the scientific method is valid, it just needs some pizzaz
>>16992194What does it mean to "believe" in science?
>>16992225If you really simplify it, it means to believe what you can see.
>>16992225You must pray every morning to the goddess of reproducible scientific results and reconstruct one experiment. If you do not, the world we end up in is entirely your fault.
>>16992225It means u wear ze mask and take ze jab. Lol.
>>16992225You have to trust it. If you dont trust the experts, then you're a nazi racist.If you're doing your own research and verifying the claims of the experts, then you're a conspiracy theorists extremists.
>>16992277
Pass.
>>16992194Define Science and we can talk.
>>16992194everybody believes in science, nobody believes in the current institutions allegedly doing science
>>16992781Fuck you I won't do what you tell me. Science didn't invent anything which didn't already potentially exist. God created all of science by creating the possibility of scientists and the possibility of possibility. You're standing on the shoulders of giant lovecraftian horrors.
>>16992194Anti-science is still scientific, can't spell anti-science without science.
>>16992194/sci/ is where science and math comes to dieit's about retards trying to justify their shit opinions or broadcast their schizo ideas/x/ is more scientific
>>16992225The people who don't believe in science don't know anything about it.They're classic self-plugged surge protector brains
>>16992830>/x/ is more scientificDepends on the subject matter desu
>>16992860>The people who don't believe in science don't know anything about it.That's just blind faith
>>16992291>shitty youtbe viideovs I saw a regime spokesman say it on the jew mediathat image has zero bearing on anything. Where information comes from has zero impact on its validity. you are a clown.
>>16992856literally inversion. everything is a conspiracy when you actually do understand how everything works. drooling retard
>>16992856name a single topic, a single subject all through history where people have never conspired to deceive people to profit from it. imbecile
>>16992875I hear the JFK assassination was pretty unambiguous.
>>16992779Science is a tool to learn things you do not know.The Scientific Method (Science)Step one: Make a genuine guess that is not retarded. (Hypothesis).Step two: Test your hypothesis in a way that is fair and unbiased. Step three: Make a fair unbiased assessment of the test results.Step four: Reach an intelligent conclusion.Step five: Allow others to criticize or review your experiment and then publish a clear guide so anyone can do the same experiment and get the same results.Example. How do we make a car that doesn't need fuel?Step one: Make a guess that sounds smart, "Hmm, maybe we have two magnets, one pulls the car."Step two: Test, build a magnet car in real life.Step three: Analyze, it didn't fucking work.Step four: Conclude, it doesn't work because... etc.Step five: Let other smart people review your experiment so they can tell you if you did it wrong. And publish a clear instruction pamphlet on how to build your own magnet car at home so you know it does not work.That is real science lol.
>>16992890That isn't science.Science is aptly, threading the gauge.
>>16992893What is the scientific method for then lol.
>>16992890Your version is beefed up and terror suspending to impress a left leaning peer.
>>16992894'that is not retarded''unbiased'Superfluous additives that only hold ground if you're woke and terrorist from the left.I suppose only intellectuals know what they mean.It's bull. You're dumb. Hopefully I can sort this.
>>16992897Threading the gauge.Pitting motto on motto.
>>16992897A 4chan audience is not smart enough to understand Science without using internet slang. Lol.
>>16992900Arguing with retards is how you end up retardedly arguing with retards. It's more common than you'd think.
>>16992899It what sensible is to a sensible person, intellectual, to an intellectual person. First step in science is becoming X intelligent and then producing something from Y.
>>16992902Can you please solve for X
>>16992902Thinking you need expert approval is stupid, you're to prove you're an expert, by phrasing it more simply, or lay out complexity unobjectionable.
>>16992903For X sensible, Y something partially sensible.
>>16992906Just 'Threading the gauge' puts the correct 'science' imagery in mind.
>>16992856Understanding is a threat to our democracy. You have to trust the experts. ChudStop worshipping your primitive religion and trust in the science and the church of experts
>>16992917Stop trusting A like a chud. Only trust B instead.
>>16992917The truth is much more entertaining. Taking humanity and Earth at first glance, should look like we're victims of an insider attack. People religiously suicidal, saying bland things, the perfect cover up, wrong things being supported, etc.You can try Lightframe if you want profit on the side, but taking part in most of this shit is instant failure/submission to temptation. Cheap thrills.
THATIf you don't see the towering abomination of the world, as is, you're a coward, or blind.
>>16992922And guess what, I'm profiting. If you read my Lightframe thread, I'm more than well versed in the esoteric knowledge there is. I'm more than aware of what's real and out there. And I'm rich too, I earned lots of natural money, and continue to do so off the back of this evil.
>>16992924You're alright where you are as far as I'm concerned. You'll make me money, and if I get a chance to counter you to fix the world, I will. I'm pretty confident I will at some point, is Lightframe for the power of good.
>>16992926On one of your sides, which you barely own. I'll have you know you do a lot of dredge work. You all collective make a trillion now and again.
>>16992872>>16992873>>16992875Found the horse paste eater
>>16992194Basedence is a sect and you get cast out if you don't believe in their collective delusions.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deNKZV3yLpE
Nobody believe in science anymore. Pro democracy people destroy science because facts undermine their democratic control over societ. Instead of sharing with you a long essay , I will paste some Bruno Latour's interview to illustrate"You’ve questioned the very idea of how we define “scientific facts.” And earlier in your career you raised all kinds of questions about the authority of scientists. Yet you’re now saying we need science to help us explain and respond to climate change.[Laughs.] That’s funny you ask this question because I’m now back to the sociology of science that I was doing 40 years ago. But the times have changed completely. So when I published Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts back in 1979, I was showing all the things necessary to be actively engaged in science, and some scientists were very shocked because they said I was debunking science by showing what it needs as a social institution."Complete https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-critical-zone-of-science-and-politics-an-interview-with-bruno-latour/Latour now is another climate cultist against white capitalist establishment. So science=good Now Again
>>16992938UPDATE: he's been dead for 4 years
>>16992291just go on pubmed brah and use llm
>>16992938If 'the left' is, what it is, imagine what 'science' is.It should be clear.Have HOPE in Lightframe to deal with masses of human stupidity and evil powers.
Bidens evil and neglect of the commoner/innocent, was invisible the whole time he was in power. It took an intellect like Trump in power to see the light. Everywhere, from all angles, is some wicked, evil cunt, winning.As said, have hope in Lightframe.
>>16992867The people who don't understand science refuse to understand it, because the secrets hidden within would shatter their sense of reality
>>16992934>"trust the science" drooler calls the noble prize winning, parasite killing medication "horse paste"yep, that's about right
>>16992947Friend, please tell me more about lighframe Before you even say a single word, it sounds like exactly the thing everybody here needs to invest everything into.
>>16992956>Secret KnowledgeK buddy
>>16992937Söyence, democracy, and all enlightenment values are based on the concept of "rules for thee, but not for me". If you are on the side of power, they let you get away with anything and dismiss your violations of the rules in the name of compassion and tolerance. If you say something that threatens those with power, they use every trick at their disposal to prosecute you to the fullest extent for a minor clerical error.The scientific method is valid, but the modern science establishment has become so corrupt that its all fake and gay and can safely be ignored.
bc they know how things works. how corrupted the academy is
>>16992968Topkek thanks for confirming
>>16993063Topkek thanks for confirming
naturalists are constantly pretending that the naturalist that came before them are retarded superstitious morons and that they have the actual truth for sure this time.Science is only useful to religious people who are fine with its utility and dont need it to produce a complete explanation for everything for them, they already have one of those. Thats how you get people clinging to increasingly shoddy models by inventing more and more unverifiable speculative explanations to keep the math working, which is fine if you just want to calculate something, but its not fine if you cant accept that the reality the calculations describe is probably just a complete fiction that people in a few hundred years will laugh at anyone for believing.
>>16993074I don't know of any truth produced by a philosopher. None.
prove science and logic are real without appealing to science or logics (which would be circular reasoning and thus invalid)
>>16993095that's why rationalism is gay, embrace empirical knowledge
>>16993095>proveSo, you already accept logic. Nice self-defeating argument.The fact that you are asking for proof implies that you have epistemic norms for such proof, and therefore use logic yourself. You concede the argument by making it.
