>>16992432
The idea that early physical pain wouldn't affect neurological development later just because a baby wouldn't remember it is retarded.
That used to be the logic, but by the same logic, you could torture or neglect to be around a baby for months and then have that create no issues at all

I would trust the Danish studies over the public just doing it!

>>16992432
RFK Jr. claimed children circumcised early had 'double' rate of autism tied to Tylenol use

>>16992432
>Autism is a trauma reaction.
>This means it's not just trauma, but actual autism.
That's what you wrote.

>>16992489
What the Studies Show (Conflicting Evidence)

Observations of Association: Some studies, such as those analyzing medical records, have noted an "association" or "correlation" between prenatal acetaminophen use and higher rates of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and ADHD

Contradictory Evidence (No Link): Larger, more robust studies—including a major 2024 study of 2.5 million births in Sweden and a 2026 study of 1.5 million children in Denmark—found no evidence of a causal link between prenatal Tylenol use and autism.

>>16992512
Only first paragraph is a response to an obvious bot.
Studies can be made to prove anything. It reminds me of a similar Danish study which found no correlation between vaccinations and autism and omitted telling that it compared vaccinated against vaccinated kids. Not exactly the method that you should use. Needless to say that 25 % or so of Denmark's GDP comes from pharmaceutical products so there's plenty of financial and economic pressure on institutions to come up with politically correct results.

Obviously, like with most things, the inconvenient facts aren't discussed, instead you have bots spamming the internet with either trivial factoids or with emotionally manipulative "I am autistic" shit.
As long as we don't know;
1. what "autism" exactly is
2. whether or not all that "autism" is deliberately made or "frauded" so as to enable billion-dollar embezzlement.
3. why exactly an insurance construct keeps dominating academic research frameworks despite little to no scientific validity
we will not be able to critically engage with the discussion.

So far it seems like a lot more kids are brain-damaged in one way or another than they used to be. Disability homes are flooded with autistic kids aging out of the special school system which never really worked in the first place and is another major scam. Are you willing to pay 1.5 million dollars for SPED just for the Downie to end up illiterate anyway? Well, apparently the government thinks you are.
Unfortunately, slapping the autism label apparently makes people forget the issue that these kiddoes do behave brain damagy.

Btw, the fact this type of culture war is being fought over autism should tell you that 1. there is a pretty much obvious scam perpetuated under the name of it, 2. that it is the side effect of some other major issue that they don't want to talk about at all e.g. that vaccines are also administered to control population growth and similarly, 3. that the diagnostic criteria constituting autism are used to emotionally manipulate and pressure people into behaving like good little bots; "smiling all day" and acting in accordance with what "others" want and being communicative, that means subordinate.

>>16992516
>more kids are brain-damaged in one way or another than they used to be.
That's just a consequence of yelling.
>these kiddoes do behave brain damagy.
Beautiful sentence fragment.
>>16992520
This is just personifying a systemic blindspot. Goodhart's law as universal failure mode of capitalism is a lot simpler than which ever ethnicity you want to claim are secretly ruling the world, and Hollingworth's communication gap between different degrees of cognitive capacity coupled with local brain damage that influence behavior but not cognition does the rest.

>>16992528
I reckon, you're right that the ignorance in regards to such topics emanates from the tiered structure that deals with such problems in the first place. Psychiatrists only go by diagnostic tools whose truthfulness they can't ascertain because this depends on scientists who invent those diagnostic tools on account of statistical institutions interested in collecting data and determining long-term economic trajectories. And since scientific studies are commissioned largely by the industry or the federal government, a lot of the critical questions simply won't be answered.

Go from psychiatric diagnostics to care and you'll see that the actual care is largely taken over by people with borderline ID/DD who have trouble understanding three sentence paragraphs. Add in industrial puppets and industrially-funded advocacy groups and you end up with a populace completely ignorant of the genuine issue at hand. So yes, people genuinely do NOT realize that the kid in front of them is brain-damaged as soon as they get an autism diagnosis because they immediately psychologize the neurological correlate.

>>16992432
Women are born followers, whereas men are born more rebellious.

They need to toture boys to make them more like women and once they have been totured they are easily molded to become a slave.

>>16992478
Pretty much. Too bad there isn't an ethical way to test just how badly early life torture affects people. Maybe we can extrapolate in the future once we fully understand how brains operate. *sigh*

>>16993360
Infant mutilation only serves one point. To prevent boys from masturbating and girls from enjoying sex. That's why the jews did it, the muslims and then the Americans.

>>16993367
No that is not the purpose. Else muslims and americans wouldnt watch so much porn.

The point is to make them less rebellious. Bascially so they submit to their leaders. Just as they always say Islam means submission and the best way to do that is toture the boys as early as possible

>>16992512
"The 46 studies were evaluated for their associations with neurodevelopmental disorders. For ADHD, among the 20 studies, 14 reported positive associations, 3 showed null associations, 1 indicated an inverse association, and 2 had mixed results. For ASD, among the 8 studies, 5 reported positive associations, 2 showed null associations, and 1 had mixed results. For other NDDs, among the 18 studies, 6 reported positive associations, 4 indicated inverse associations, 2 showed null associations, and 6 had mixed results. These categories, derived from the Navigation Guide’s strength-of-evidence framework, highlight the variability in findings and mitigate confirmation bias by including all outcome types."

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12940-025-01208-0#Tab4

"We conducted an NCE analysis and evaluated the associations between maternal acetaminophen use during different exposure periods and ADHD among 8,856 children born in 1993-2005 to women enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study II cohort. Information on regular maternal acetaminophen use was collected prospectively in biennial questionnaires. A total of 721 children (8.1%) in the cohort had been diagnosed with ADHD as reported by the mothers. Our NCE analysis suggested that only acetaminophen use at the time of pregnancy was associated with childhood ADHD (odds ratio = 1.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.05, 1.72), and the effect estimates for the 2 NCE periods (about 4 years before and 4 years after the pregnancy) were null. Our findings corroborate those of prior reports suggesting that prenatal acetaminophen exposure may influence neurodevelopment. The lack of an association between acetaminophen use in the pre- and postpregnancy exposure periods and ADHD provides assurance that uncontrolled time-invariant factors do not explain this association."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30923825/