>start calculating>promising result>still not there yet>introduce dark variables>close, but not perfect>introduce black variables>even closer, but result still isn't quite right>think>notice that I can assign different weights to my darkies, depending on the need to get a balanced equation>model is now a perfect fit>go to professor>he doesn't understand>tell him the problem needs to be modelled with dark variables>tell him that observed reality - model results = darkies>he's thrilled>apply for grant>everyone's enthusiastic>tfw we get billions of dollar>we call it the söyentific method>we solve many more unsolvable problems>every time a perfect fit>science flourishes>critics can't do shit because our perfect results prove the methodology and the methodology proves the resultthank you darkies
Don't reproduce.
>>16993433If a monkey steals a banana and a human takes it back, the monkey reacts aggressively.
Martin Nowak, the Harvard söyentist. That's the kind of person who tells you what you're allowed to think. The monkey fuhrer.
>>16993444If a monkey fucks a saxophone, does the musician react by using a different instrument?
Man, the conxept that some things can have mass without interacting with other fields is truly mind melting to low-IQs.
