>says shit falls when you drop it>says shit moves when you hit it>says when something happens other shit also happens >regarded as a genius with 300 iq You guys can't actually think this guy was anything beyond a brainlet stating the obvious, right?
>>16994414Imagine how retarded his contemporaries were if they couldn't figure that shit out themselves back then.
>>16994414>>16994417You sound fat
>>16994414Your inability to understand the way of thinking that leads to a particular philosophy is a sign of your mental disability.
>>16994414There is no conclusive historical evidence that Sir Isaac Newton was gay. Historians generally agree that he never had a romantic relationship and is widely believed to have died a virgin.Life of Celibacy: Newton never married and was deeply dedicated to his work. Many historians believe his intense focus and lack of romantic or sexual interest suggest he was asexualRelationship with Fatio de Duillier: Newton had a notably close relationship with the Swiss mathematician Nicolas Fatio de Duillier in the late 1680s and 1690s. Their intense correspondence and Newton's severe depression when the friendship ended have led some biographers to speculate that Newton had romantic or repressed homosexual feelings.
>>16994414This guy was a wealthy noble (NEET) and he had time to ask those basic questions. Everyone else was a wageslaving peasant with limited time and education.
>>16994414he literally invented new math to predict position of bodies in time
>>16994414He was just the first to write it down. The smarter people were too busy being smart to write stuff. Basically it was dumb luck
>>16994470Gravity doesn't even pull. Guys a nutjob, along with most historical experts.
>>16994470>first to write down that shit falls and things move when you... move them?Yeah fucking right
>>16994414you know that he is the guy who basically invented calculus and thus found a way more precise way to describe kinematics and mechanics?
>>16994605>invented Discovered. Also Leibniz did it at the same time. This is not to undersell Newton of course.
>>16994414this is either bait or op is retarded and skipped high school
>>16994605He invented differential equations to do physics, retard cuck
>>16994640differential equations are part of calculus
>i could have said thatbut you didn't
Even if you aren't impressed by the laws of motion, gravity and calculus, he also invented optics on the side.
>>16994445He was gay, Isaac Newton?
>>16994456No he didn't. He combined 2000 year-old ideas with Descartes' idea of the plane to relate algebra to geometry. It was an inevitability, and the only reason it didn't happen millennia earlier was the Greek autism that math is sacred and shouldn't be tainted with arithmetic and algebra.
>>16995122>All your accomplishments were actually OURS or in some way because of US >Zero euros earned Fucking grade A cope.
>>16994456He also was a weenie puffer
>>16995169Way to miss the point entirely, /pol/fag.
He also invented putting ridges on coins so jews couldn't shave off bits of them
>>16995122>DescartesI fucking hate that guy sooo so much.If I had a time machine I would travel back in time and shit in his shoes!
>>16994474>Gravity doesn't even pullOh please enlighten us as to what gravity is, if its not a force thats faster than light that pulls stuff.I'll wait
>>16995329AI sloppa image equals opinion disregarded
>>16995347You wish you could produce AI art half this good, you dont even know the meaning of slop you little piggy since you gobble up slop all day long from other sources.
>>16995347Presumably the hight of your ability to produce prompts is; orange man bad.Kek, I put in the prompt in for you and this is what it produces, you can see the difference in quality, you just full of shit
>>16995361"God emporer trump with a flaming sword" is a much better prompt
>>16995324Lol why?
>>16994414He not only mathematically quantified it but did so in a reproducible scientific manner, in a way that fixed issues with Keplers prior models. Furthermore, it was all done with a mystical alchemist philosophy in mind to derive the hidden Divine laws of the cosmos. This is the most important point but is also the one that nu-scientists and atheists love to gloss over.
>>16995324His ideas have formed the foundation of western thinking (the age of the enlightenment). Such concepts as the cartesian system shapes how we visual spacetime as x,y,z coordinates. While a useful tool for visualising space, it is not the correct depiction of space and leads to incorrect theories of space due to it being a flawed concept designed to be a tool to increase our understanding while some people treat it as the correct interpretation of space.He is also known for his concepts about the human psyche which lead to the development of the clinical manual which doesn't acknowledge the existence of the soul, so it confuses conscious decisions with subconscious behaviours e.g. The misidentification of non-autistic behaviors as autism often occurs when clinicians fail to account for the "social relational" context of a patient's presentation, instead relying on static diagnostic categories that prioritize deficits over adaptive strategies.When I trace back problems within modern understandings, they can usually be traced back to rené descartes and his reductionist views.People need to understand why rené was wrong, so these flaws within his concepts don't blossom into false information.
>>16995428So I mean to link >>16995479Its an extremely complicated and convoluted thing to explain but I hope you can grasp what im alluding too and how western thinking is built on a fabrication and not a fact, but without that fabrication we wouldn't of achieved facts like Quantum Mechanics, but now we have QM we no longer need the fabrications of rené and should work on uniting Classical Mechanics to QM.Now if you can imagine the clincal manual as the QM of psychology, we know QM is not a realistic view of reality the same way the clinical manual is not a coherent view of the human psyche but it is a good tool to control/manipulate the human psyche.Instead of using reductionist thinking and methods, with must revise his work we deductive methodology to now further our understanding (we must examine the spirit, something science says doesn't exsist but we all experience and feel it even if science can't prove its existence)
>>16994414This guy did a lot more things during his time that made him legendary but people mainly remember the gravity idea
>>16995482>we must examine the spirit, something science says doesn't exsist but we all experience and feel it even if science can't prove its existencePlato produced the theia mania which describes the psyche much better than any clinical manual yet most people don't even know or understand his theory of forms & essence and only know of the clinical manual.These esoteric teachings need to be far more mainstream, spiritual alchemy should replace gender studies. IMO
>>16995486>spiritual alchemyI have watched this term changing over the past couple of months, from alchemy of the soul to spirital alchemy and concepts within it such a decoupling being removed...The true is slowly being obscured
>>16995324>>16995482>AI slopOpinion discarded.Also>should work on uniting Classical Mechanics to QM.Holy shit, you're dumb.
>>16995347>>16995492>Doesn't know what slop isDo you need educating what slop is? Because by the sounds of it you consider anything produced using AI is slop...Which means you probably consume copius amounts of slop and enjoy it because its not ai generate, come on little piggy you like slop just because it's ai it doesn't stop it being slop. Eat the slop you greedy little piggy
>>16995492>Holy shit, you're dumb.Come on shit for brains, din din times, time to eat your slop
>>16995492Do you understand what AI slop is yet, or do I still need to put it in perspective for you.
>>16995492>Opinion discarded>Holy shit, you're dumb.Tastie slop, mmmmmm slop, you love slop dont you, just as long as its not ai slop
>Pajeets having a severe meltdown ITT
>>16995533This is /pol/ jimmy
>>16995356>>16995361I'm not even american. You seen autistic
>>16995600*Seem. Sorry for my typo
Another thread hidden
>>16995356>>16995513>>16995514>>16995515>>16995516Your meltdown at being called out for posting trash is hilarious.
Simplified it a little. Pretty much discovered gravity when there was just a handful of books with lots of misinformation and ideas that were wrong that were considered cannon. Some people got some stuff right but loads of bullshit was flying around back then.
>>16994428Lmao
>>16995751Too bad your reply isn't as equally as entertaining, is ragebait all you have to contribute? This is why your posts don't get replies, git gud nub, everyone one loves to watch people have meltdowns...
"From his analysis of balls (or apples) that fall toward the earth Newton went on to consider gravitation in wider terms. Suppose, he said, we shoot a bullet horizontally from the top of a mountain so high that it rises above the atmosphere. The bullet will follow a curved trajectory and hit the surface of the earth some distance away from the base of the mountain. The greater the muzzle velocity, the farther away from the mountain the bullet will land. At a sufficiently high initial velocity the bullet will come to earth at a point directly opposite the mountain; at still higher velocity it will never hit the ground but will continue to revolve around the earth like a little moon. If, Newton argued, it is possible in this way to make an artificial satellite, why not assume that the motion of the natural moon is also a free fall? And if the moon revolves around the earth because of the earth's gravitational attraction, is it not logical to assume that the earth itself is held in orbit around the sun by the force of the sun's gravity? Then is this not also true for all the other planets and their satellites? So originated the profoundly important idea of universal gravitation, which states that all material bodies in the universe attract one another with forces determined by their masses and mutual distances.To establish the exact relation of force to mass and distance, Newton began by assuming that, since the force between the earth and each body near its surface is proportional to the inertial mass of the body, the force should also be proportional to the inertial mass of the earth. This immediately explained why the gravitational attraction between bodies of small mass, such as two apples, had never been noticed. It was too weak. Having postulated that the gravitational attraction between two bodies is proportional to the product of their masses, Newton then investigated the dependence on distance."
"He compared the force necessary to hold the moon in its orbit at the distance of 60 earth radii with the force on an apple at the distance of only one radius from the center of the earth. It is important to realize here that the great difference in mass between the two bodies does not affect the validity of the comparison. As a matter of fact, an apple placed at the m oon's distance and given its orbital velocity will move around the earth exactly as the moon does; by the same token, if one could suspend the moon from a branch, it would fall to the ground exactly as fast as apples do. Newton's mathematical analysis showed that the force of gravity decreases as the square of the distances between the attracting bodies.He could now write the formula for gravitational force: F = G (M1M2)/d2• G is the constant of proportionality, or the gravitational constant. It is a very small number; if the masses are measured in grams and the distance in centimeters, G is approximately .000000066. This means that a pair of one-gram weights separated by one centimeter attract each other with a force a little more than six hundred-millionths of a dyne, or about six hundred-billionths of the weight of a gram.Combining the law of gravitation with his laws of motion, Newton was able to derive mathematically the rules governing planetary motion that had been discovered by Johannes Kepler. In the memorable era that followed, Newton and his successors explained the motions of celestial bodies down to the most minute details. "https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/gamow-gravity/
>>16995364Lolicons dont need to invade every single place a homosexual man exists in or is talked about. Please go away.
>>16996234>Please go away.Right back at you, wtf are you talking about?
