is it happening?https://www.theguardian.com/science/2026/jun/05/international-space-station-astronauts-under-evacuation-ordershttp://archive.today/2qr4r
>>16994544Losing 500g of air (thats as much as a loaf of bread weights) does not sound like a biggi does it? Just put your finger on it to seal it like last time
>gaystronauts can't help but make a glory hole AGAIN
>>16994615The glory hole is hungry and can't be satisfied with cum, blood, or tears, though it will happily consume them all.
ISS is far beyond its expected lifespan. Resources have been used to extend its lifespan, but eventually there comes a point of diminishing returns as lots of system decay too much and simple material fatigue create an endless stream of little problems, each of which can become catastrophic due to being up in orbit.
>>16994544>is it happeningIt's not happening if it does not exist. A warehouse at an undisclosed location on the Earth's surface is not going to have an atmosphere leak.
>>16994741and modular structures are inherently weak
>>16994741But we'll definitely be able to deliver some corpses to mars soon.
>>16994558>Just put your finger on it to seal it like last time
>>16994558>100 cubic meters of air isn't a problemHeard it here first, I'll contact NASA and let them know not to worry.
>>16994544Was it a woman moment again?
>>16994936500gram of air is about half a qubic meter of air you stupid asshole
Meanwhile tiangong 2 doesn't have this problem. China wins again.
>>16995171Since it's both a new space station and they've been able to learn from the issues with ISS, they probably do have far fewer operational difficulties than the ancient hodge-podge of modules that make up ISS. Even if they did have issues, doubt China would announce that to the world. The big question is how much longer can ISS be extended? They probably keep pushing it into extra use despite obvious accumulation of wear and tear because there's no solid, realistic plan for a replacement any time soon.
