[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor applications are now closed. Thanks to all who applied!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 5.png (368 KB, 718x872)
368 KB PNG
But the explanation is bullshit.
>>
File: 12.png (155 KB, 686x464)
155 KB PNG
We know there are magnetic fields between galaxies.
>>
File: 13.png (125 KB, 789x850)
125 KB PNG
We know of massive currents in space. They are much, much harder to detect than magnetic fields, though.
>>
File: 8.jpg (354 KB, 1665x1024)
354 KB JPG
We know that Birkeland currents can spin and twirl.

No need for dark matter bullshit.
>>
File: 7.png (111 KB, 471x843)
111 KB PNG
>We know that Birkeland currents can spin and twirl
visualized
>>
File: HKNFjjAWcAAfuvf.png (400 KB, 596x898)
400 KB PNG
The reason for this "mysterious alignment" is also very simple.
>>
File: mxcro8.jpg (340 KB, 2673x1446)
340 KB JPG
"Black holes" are in reality an entirely different object and these are all powered by the same Birkeland current. This is why they're aligned. Btw, plasmoids are confirmed to emerge in the Sun's corona. There's no reason why this can't happen in a galaxy's center, as long as you don't deny that electromagnetic forces on macroscopic scales exist.
>>
File: 14.png (93 KB, 306x215)
93 KB PNG
Plasmoids can also produce jets.
>>
File: 3.png (99 KB, 667x348)
99 KB PNG
>greatly exceeded expectations
Yes, because scientists used a dynamo model. But magnetic fields can be created by current flow.
>>
File: 2.jpg (134 KB, 978x1003)
134 KB JPG
In fact, current flow has been used to explain Saturn's temperature.
>>
File: 1.jpg (174 KB, 1180x1054)
174 KB JPG
Breaking: "magnetic ropes" discovered in my cell phone charging cable
>>
File: 4.jpg (189 KB, 1075x1158)
189 KB JPG
Uhhh, just a coincidence
>>
File: GtKS3AdXcAESlhT.jpg (126 KB, 793x1049)
126 KB JPG
> The Radcliffe wave is a neighbouring coherent gaseous structure in the Milky Way, dotted with a related high concentration of interconnected stellar nurseries. It stretches about 8,800 light years.
> Its discovery was announced in January 2020, and its proximity surprised astronomers.
>Scientists do not know how the undulation of dust and gas formed.

Undulation? Maybe a rotating plasma system like the galaxy shouldn't be modeled with purely gravitational effects in mind.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radcliffe_wave


Hannes Alfvén, who won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1970 for his work on magnetohydrodynamics, had repeatedly stated that electrical phenomena in space must not be disregarded, as otherwise models would remain incomplete and unexplained phenomena would be inevitable.

>The heliospheric current sheet was discovered by John M. Wilcox and Norman F. Ness, who published their finding in 1965.[15] Hannes Alfvén and Per Carlqvist speculate on the existence of a galactic current sheet, a counterpart of the heliospheric current sheet, with an estimated galactic current of 1017 to 1019 amperes, that might flow in the plane of symmetry of the galaxy.
>>
File: 9.jpg (298 KB, 1590x1590)
298 KB JPG
Textbook z-pinch effect. Don't be surprised to find plasma effects in a universe that is 99.999% plasma.
>has to be gravity and dark matter sir
>>
File: x9j47293dmfd1.jpg (86 KB, 901x490)
86 KB JPG
You have to believe that astrophysicists are the most monkeytarded people in existence, but to their defense:

“We classified whole entire areas of physics during the nuclear era and made them state secrets”
https://x.com/TheProjectUnity/status/1814180209278525604
>>
File: 1780915073059865.jpg (33 KB, 480x640)
33 KB JPG
What happens if you move a solid sphere through plasma? The surface can get damaged.
So they call it gas.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-0vmvmh8NE
>>
File: 43d.png (785 KB, 1472x1036)
785 KB PNG
>>16998070
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-0vmvmh8NE
“We classified whole entire areas of physics during the nuclear era and made them state secrets”
>>
>>16998070
The history of cataclysms, because in regular intervals this sun system crosses spurs of the galactic current sheet, the last time likely 12,000 years ago.

Self-organized plasma flows develop because plasmas are open, dissipative, nonlinear systems that are far from equilibrium and therefore prone to instabilities and emergence.
Cosmic filaments are Birkeland currents.
In laboratories, you have to go to great lengths to avoid self-organizing plasma effects and current flows.
Gravity + dark matter + dark energy + black holes are just the workaround because they don't use electromagnetic forces to model cosmic phenomena.

>Dark comets are a class of asteroids that exhibit some behavior consistent with comets, but do not grow a comet's tail or produce a coma, making them visually appear as asteroids. They are distinguished from other asteroids by their non-gravitational acceleration, which causes them to deviate from their expected orbital path.
>Since the unexplained acceleration is away from the direction of the sun, the scientists hypothesized that the acceleration is produced by outgassing from the sunlit side of the surface.
They interact with electric fields
etc
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_comet

The coma in comets is plasma glow.
>>
File: dj_stereo_xeye.png (276 KB, 1053x770)
276 KB PNG
Two asteroids had fused together and created this one. But gravity cannot explain why this happened. A collision doesn't cause objects to fuse together like this. And the dozens of craters are from electrical arcing.

You can also see Lichtenberg figures near Upheaval Dome and the Richat structure.
See this article:
https://xenosarc.substack.com/p/event-x-and-the-end-of-this-cycle
Rothschild science, unsurprisingly, is full of bullshit.
>>
>But the explanation is bullshit.

Cry harder. Rotating filaments were actually predicted by standard cosmology. The paper which made the measurements was inspired by a theory paper which had been published shortly before. Cosmological Cold Dark Matter simulations predicted rotating filaments.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.02418

>>16998049
Except the whole measurement of filaments is meaningless if you accept the electric universe assertion that redshift is not distance. The filaments structure and velocities are measured using spectroscopic redshifts of galaxies. As is often the case, EU proponents never actually think about whether the measurements even make sense in their "cosmology". You are about average in that all you have done is collect screenshots of popsci articles.
>>
File: SgrA2018.gif (1.22 MB, 512x524)
1.22 MB GIF
>>16998056
So if it's so simple, why don't these EU theorists calculate a simple prediction for the stars that orbit the object in the Galactic Center? Ah yes, because they aren't actual physicists. The orbits just happen to match the predictions of general relativity.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.