>>16998768i had a lot of sex with a scientist once
>>16998768>"asbestos is a great insulator!"it actually is.
>>16998768>implying publicists are scientistsngmi
>>16998768>Here are a bunch of claims pushed by corporations until experts proved them false, do you really trust the EXPERTS on this last one?!?
>>16998789I don't because """experts""" will gladly sell out for money.
>>16998768smoker here, smoking is clearly harmful, BUT, while smoking I've had an abnormal cold and fever resistance. my theory is that the same layer of tobaco oils coating my lungs is a physical resistance against these virus or whatever they might be. would that make sense?
>>16998795it's more likely that your immune system is repressed so in a round about way you might be right
>>16998790So you should believe that cocaine, smoking, lead, etc are all safe and good since it's the experts who are saying they're bad. Quit bothering us and go huff some asbestos powder.
>>16998768Elon musk just helped his shareholders >Muh "not useful to me and rockets aren't real science"Skill issue.
Finding one of those old medication bottles would be gold now.
>>16998768You know how chemo therapy sucks? It's because it's killing you and the cancer, it's just faster at killing the cancer than you. There was a time when all medicines worked that way. Syphilis? Here's some arsenic. Parasites? Here's some mercury salts. Etc.If you've ever been sick and didn't have to be poisoned near death to recover then the Sciences have done something for you.
>>16999454By the way new generation of targeting chemotherapies are moving towards far fewer side effects. Your complaint is with capitalism not science
