We are going to cure them all this century!
>>16999047>We are going to cure them all this century!Niggercattle will have another century or two of exponentially escalating chronic disease rates before getting violently culled. If that counts as "curing", then the cure is indeed coming.
>>16999119another decade or two*
>>16999047Why is "eating disorders" on this list?
>>16999121it is a biological disease
>>16999124>AIslop telling you that your lifestyle choices are heckin' cute and valid and not your fault
>>16999127>https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9847054/#Sec3you can read about all the causses in here. it is multivariable, but curable.
>>16999124Schizophrenia has genetic and neurochemical implications. That doesn't make it any less out of place on a list like this.>>16999129>When referring to ‘risk factors’ in this review, we are not always referring to causal risk factors. Accordingly, some of the risk factors included in this review are correlated or associated with increased risk of an ED, without evidence of causation. As the aim of a Rapid Review is to broadly synthesise findings, we did not narrow to studies only providing evidence regarding the causal relationship of risk factors.
>>16999129I know you didn't read this. Did you at least ask the token guesser to "read" the slop it found for you before you posted it?
>>16999133holy cope. This article is THE article on eating disorders, reviewing all others. Everyone that has ever read something about them recently knows it... your lack of knowledge of it shows your opinion on EDs are irrelevant. Nice way to out yourself goober.>>16999132>A broad review of the literature has been provided, however future studies are required which critique the strength of evidence of the causal nature of these risk factors.read the conclusion. We are going to find out this century what the causes are and cure it. EDs are a great example of complex diseases that require advances in multiple fields of science to cure.
>>16999136>This article is THE article on eating disorders, reviewing all others.It's a rapid review. Basically a low effort meta-analysis that just quickly summarizes known data. You can find many others like it:Example: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12423590/Oh wait. That one's a systemic review, which is more rigorous than a rapid review. You betray total ignorance on what these kinds of articles even are.>future studies are required which critique the strength of evidence of the causal nature of these risk factors.Ie. Such a critique does not exist in the paper your shitty LLM cited.Among the risk factors listed were "high BMI" and parental teasing. Meaning they're fat fucks who got bullied for being fat so now they're insecure about their weight. That's the most plain reading of eating disorders you don't need a study to figure out. Problem is they have zero discipline so they go on feast/famine cycles rather than holding to a consistently healthy diet/exercise regimen.
>>16999136What's next? A """study""" from the scientific consortium on tranny rights """reviewing""" all the other research to authoritatively conclude that you're a real woman?
>>16999140Congrats you know the difference between reviews. You have already outed yourself as not knowing anything up to date, or at all on EDs. Even an amateur would know the most review of the disease (yet you dont)just begone already go play some fortnite kid.
>>16999148What's next? A """study""" from the scientific consortium of pharma peddlers """reviewing""" all the other research to authoritatively conclude 5 years olds totally have """ADHD""" and need more meth to treat it?
>>16999148You (well, technically the LLM you screenshotted and blindly believed) are the one who misinterpreted risk factors for causative agents and then cited rapid review as "THE article on eating disorders." You have zero understanding of the things which you are opining on and when your ignorance is called out you pretend to be smug and dismissive. You know you did a fucky-wucky just now. Own it.
>>16999047I'm not convinced diseases can be cured desu, at best I think prevention through gene editing. I doubt stuff like autoimmune disease or cancer will ever be 100% eliminated though.
>>16999047only if gods chosen allows them to be cured
>>16999155nigger I got the article from my mind not an LLM. I went to a place called univeristy two years ago for bioinformatics >>16999159Diseases are material, and material matters operate according to laws. Hence we ought to be able to solve it
>>16999281>I went to a place called univeristy two years ago for bioinformaticsThey owe you a refund then because you somehow cane out of it not understanding how to interpret a meta-analysis. The fact that you even think "THE article on eating disorders" is even a thing that could conceptually exist betrays that ignorance.>Diseases are material, and material matters operate according to laws. Hence we ought to be able to solve itChaotic systems are an entire field of research in their own right. Just because a solution theoretically exists in one instance doesn't mean it's generalizeable to other instances. And the solution to any particular instance could very well be so convoluted, or require such tight tolerances, as to be effectively unsolvable. Obviously killing every single cancer cell individually would cure cancer. The question is whether a method of doing so, without killing the patient, in a way that can be broadly applied to other people is even a thing that could exist in principle.
>>16999047That's an extremely small number in that pic. That's more like a "cure diseases in developed states where a good number of these can be dealt with through diet changes and bare minimum activity." List.
>>16999047oh great, a planet of 30 billion people, sounds like heaven
