probably best not to make threads thank you

what is the point of this

>>17003560
Keep reading and keep thinking

Don't post retarded trash tho lil bro

You are forgiven but only this once

>>17003560
>Am I not cut out for science?
>Should I just throw in the towel
just keep reading. ask chatbots the right questions. the issue is, this "climate change" causing further co2/ch4 release) has to had its own nigger. so far, siberian large igneous province seems to be the main trigger. basically cooling earth's core sometimes sends huge chunks of magma to surface (mantle plume) that almost kills us every 50-100 million years

File: 1780408287749346.jpg (24 KB, 720x430)

24 KB JPG

>>17003560
>And understood maybe 5% of what I read
><proceeds to attempt to summarize in xhis own words>
I don't know about the topic, but you absolutely have the right mental makeup and attitude to appreciate science.
Curious, inquisitive (asks questions), humble and ready to be corrected and learn. You even synthesized what you learned through your own understanding and experience (by attempting to summarize what you read)

please keep at it, anon.
Wiki articles are not always written in a coherent way that presents a single linear narrative. Articles can be made of patchworks of small contributions which may not form a coherent whole or a salient narrative. (I edit/contribute to wikipedia sometimes)

for me, as an eternally curious person, it is a VERY common experience for me to skim or read through something and walk away feeling like I have no idea what is going on.
But you'd be amazed at how, if you go back to the same topic in a few days/weeks/months, suddenly everything is more clear because the terminology has had time to settle in our heads

You question yourself and your knowledge which is the mark of someone who actively wants to learn. Many people who work in STEM and contribute to it, do not do this, they tend to focus more on obtaining authoritative facts rather than open-ended explanations