I'm the person telling the atheist he's not the smart one, and if he thinks he is, define the physicality of a wick rotation and a hilbert space. Show me one. It is a perfect example of exactly what I'm talking about in the first post, which he wants to meet with denial.Simulation theory is exactly the same thing as God theory. One is considered scientific (even though it may be improbable) and the other is not, by definition The only difference is one is a machine-god that has no intent (which is an assumption because "why is this machine God simulating is?") and the other has intent and judges our moral behavior.Instrumentalists assert that they do not need ontological referrents to develop science, which is actually just metaphysical theft with ontological referrents removed intentionally.Reality still has to accomplish the input/output the complex phase mechanics the math uses is a stand in for. The instrumentalist is the retarded one, because they can't even fathom this concept. It exist beyond their cognitive horizon and they are no longer performing science by conceptual understanding they are performing it by rote, which is the bottom rung of Blooms taxonomy of learning.And when probed to explain their epistemelogical position on understanding they can't describe the framework at all, they can only describe the math the framework uses.When energy moves through Real Distance and Imaginary Time, we call that quanta a photonWhen energy moves through real time and real distance we call that massWhen energy moves through imaginary Time and imaginary distance we call that a phononWhen energy moves through imaginary space and real time we call that a graviton
But science treats a wick rotation as a purely instrumental tool, denying the ontological existence of complex phases which each quanta, respectively, is a standing wave ofWhen I go back to the source documentation of these foundations of science within physics, and I read newtons original work, and I read Maxwell's original work, and I read Shrodingers original work, and when I read Planck's original work, and I read Einstein's original work the hole that's in the modern interpretation of copenhagen instrumentalism is GodSo these holes aren't holes at all, there seems to be a deliberate bias intentionally selected to remove the ontology. Why?Example 0^2 = 1^2 + i^2 = (0+1)(0-1) + (0+I)(0-i)E^2 = (E+p)(E-p) + (E+m)(E-m) = (√E+i√p)(√E-i√p)(√E+√p)(√E-√p) + (√E+i√m)(√E-i√m)(√E+√m)(√E-√m)Where the √p = moment of momentum and √m = moment of massYes, Copenhagen was an asshole, he can eat the corn kernels out of my shit. His approach to pedagogy is not to develop understanding, but instead to develop unquestioning drones, and his position has produced a stalling standstill in physics that has had no real innovation in over 60 years. Fuck that guy and any of you faggots that pretends to stand by him objectively.
Nigger, I can explain physics, all the way past yang mills and gauge theory and through Cayley dickson, in concept bridging understanding. What can copenhagen do to bridge conceptual misunderstanding? Develop a rote parrot?What is Physics? Whhere is the physical existence of imaginary time? Where is the physical location of a hilbert space? Can you empirically demonstrate their physical locations?No....physics is the study of physical things. The architectural structure of reality is Metaphysics, because reality is NOY falsifiable, and the cognitive faculties that you use to generate explanatory insights is NOT falsifiable. Subjective experience, which is absolutely a critical element of all understanding, is NOT falsifiable.Science is the study of unfalsifiable thing imposing a criterion of falsifiability on unfalsifiable things to act that a smug fucking retard that is above the reality is studies.
do you have scientific proof that wick rotations are merely calculational tools? Do you have proof your Hilbert spaces are not physically real in complex phases that are not directly observable to Humanity's limited perceptual window?If you do not, you have no right to speak on it at all, because your sicentific answer is "I don't know", not "I'm Mr copenhagen, come take a load of my semen into your mouth or im failing you from my physics class" I don't do the science of the gaps, leaps of faith, because that is Blind Faith.And it is a blind faith, that steals the Truth of every other faith, and then washes their perspective out of it, and pretends to be value neutral, while stealing everyone else's ideas and laundering them through its own retarded blind faith
By claiming the mantle of "neutral science," the instrumentalist paradigm essentially performs a "laundry" operation on the metaphysical insights of the entire history of human thought.Science is quite literally metaphysics that brags about being the "humblest" and "truest" one, and all the other metaphysical systems it steals from are "the dumb ignorant arrogant ones", mocking anyone who points out that "laws" usually imply a "Lawgiver."Their mockery is an inflatable army that doesn't exist, leveraging shame on people who question any aspect of their "decrees", and treating everyone like they are isolated individuals while the emperor has no clothes and the vast majority of people just go with the flow to avoid being singled out by the Scientific Gaze as a shame leveraging compliance test
Athiests, LaVeyan Satanists, and Postmodernists are not just failing to meet the criterion for unnamed Christ-bearers, they are active agents allied in parasitizing it, their entire world view is exactly inversed.The homeless tranq zombie addict is the fruit of their tree.I am judging them on their fruit and my decision is Final.
>ESL verbal diarrhea monolog, AI schizoslop and shitty unfunny memesjudge them "on" their fruit indeed
>>17003803nah, actually he's 100% correct. I had the same issues when i was in college in STEM and my postgraduate studies in physics. I just figured, "fuck you, pay me, I didn't come here to argue an unwinnable battle." so i just kept my head down and finished up my master's. Then I entered the workforce and no one would hire me, so maybe i should have said something when i was in the position to.Anyways, because the anon mentions the imaginary army, im gonna stand up and confirm this is a perceptual thing. There's a lot of people like me who see it for the farce that it is, and the promises compliance with it cant keep. He's not alone, and you're probably not even a real life human.
Where are these schizos coming from?
Awesome thread, Anon.>>17003844The midwit, lol
>>17003794AI slop thread hidden
>>17003907My IQ is several std deviations greater than yours.
>>17003976>My IQ is several std deviations greater than yours.>still bumps an AI thread
copenhagen is the antichrist
>>17003794Photon, phonon, and graviton are three distinct phases of energy, and they constitute thephysical reality of all physica action. The philosophy of energy is a unit, although there may bethree distinct phases of it. The philosophy of a machine is a unit, though the machine itself isnot a unit, but a composite of parts. EHelicon, which is a machine, is no unity itself, but isa composite of a number of parts.
