>>17004311
no, because old bodies are weaker and childbirth is really difficult

>>17004311
Basically, the reproduction rate is at extinction levels, 52% of Western Women at reproductive age like 18-40 have no children.

I would like to say that this promoted evolution, but quite the contrary, the Women selected for their intelligence and working ability didn't have children.

The Women with no impulse control, who failed out of school, resorted to being baby makers for failed males.

Essentially, as a Scientific fact, the "Modern" era has set back Humanity in the ballpark of 2 - 10,000 years of evolution, worse setbacks than during the dark ages when literate men were forced to be incels.

>>17004311
Holy shit. You're retarded.

Idk what does the graph say?

>>17004388
>I would like to say that this promoted evolution, but quite the contrary, the Women selected for their intelligence and working ability didn't have children.
>The Women with no impulse control, who failed out of school, resorted to being baby makers for failed males.
Both rates are in the crater.

>>17004388
>extinction levels
nowhere close to that. Maybe a decline, but number not always going up doesn't mean the end of the world.